Possible HP gains with bolt ons
I haven't and one of my frustrations with all of these bolt on's and tunes is the lack of dyno run data that back up the claims. Seem that all of these enhancement guys are never willing to be all that forthcoming.. Seems like everything is always shrouded in PM's.. The more critical might interpret it as snake oil, although my personal interpretation is that the gains are there, just somewhat overstated in the larger context..
But with any type of intake enhancement it is about smooth airflow (i.e reducing turbulence) and minimizing pressure drop. It is essentially a fluid dynamics enhancement. And in general the less optimized the original OEM design, the better the enhancement tends to look.
But with any type of intake enhancement it is about smooth airflow (i.e reducing turbulence) and minimizing pressure drop. It is essentially a fluid dynamics enhancement. And in general the less optimized the original OEM design, the better the enhancement tends to look.
The claimed numbers are only the peak-to-peak gains, while gains throughout the powerband are higher than this.
I'm not sure 10 HP for a tune is exactly what I'd get a woodie over. My experience with NA tunes is that the throttle remap probably contributes to most of the perceived increase in performance especially in the lower RPMs of a 991 (and when I say lower I'm talking 2K not 4.5K).
Not saying it isn't worth it, just calling it what it really is. Below about 3500 there isn't really much in terms of HP gain, there is some torque kicking in by about 3K which does help. But certainly not a nirvana.
Most of the folks who get a significant increase in performance on a tune are turbo-charged. Had a 1.8 Audi once that was turbocharged and the gains were truly amazing, but that is what you get when you up the boost on a turbo (hoping not destroy the engine) but getting much out of a NA seems to be more about a small incremental gain with the tune and attempting to move some torque down to the lower RPMs..
I think if you couple them all together (tune + exhaust + plenum) it starts to be significant. . 10 for the tune, 15 for exhaust and 10 for the intake then you are getting to that 40 HP increase.. now you are in the 10% increase range although I'm not sure it is always additive at the same RPMs..
Not saying all of those aren't a bad deal.. Probably still less than the price of the X51 with a bit more gain.. But I'm not sure I'd be blown away with the before and after anymore than I have been with an X51.. it is about incremental gain.
Not saying it isn't worth it, just calling it what it really is. Below about 3500 there isn't really much in terms of HP gain, there is some torque kicking in by about 3K which does help. But certainly not a nirvana.
Most of the folks who get a significant increase in performance on a tune are turbo-charged. Had a 1.8 Audi once that was turbocharged and the gains were truly amazing, but that is what you get when you up the boost on a turbo (hoping not destroy the engine) but getting much out of a NA seems to be more about a small incremental gain with the tune and attempting to move some torque down to the lower RPMs..
I think if you couple them all together (tune + exhaust + plenum) it starts to be significant. . 10 for the tune, 15 for exhaust and 10 for the intake then you are getting to that 40 HP increase.. now you are in the 10% increase range although I'm not sure it is always additive at the same RPMs..
Not saying all of those aren't a bad deal.. Probably still less than the price of the X51 with a bit more gain.. But I'm not sure I'd be blown away with the before and after anymore than I have been with an X51.. it is about incremental gain.
Additionally, any hardware upgrades that you add the car make software upgrades a requirement. Any gains you would make from the hardware you install will be erased by the torque management in the DME. This is why companies like Champion Motorsport sell their upgrades in conjunction with a GIAC software upgrade.
These cars have a pretty significant gain in the mid range that is quicte noticeable with our software upgrade. There have been independent reviews of our software posted on this forum stating exactly that and more. On the latest model cars (DFI), what people will notice most is the torque gain, in my opinion. The car does pull harder to redline but unless you're measuring that with trap speeds on the road course or using a vbox, it's not going to be as noticeable (when comparing to a forced induction upgrade).
Additionally, any hardware upgrades that you add the car make software upgrades a requirement. Any gains you would make from the hardware you install will be erased by the torque management in the DME. This is why companies like Champion Motorsport sell their upgrades in conjunction with a GIAC software upgrade.
Additionally, any hardware upgrades that you add the car make software upgrades a requirement. Any gains you would make from the hardware you install will be erased by the torque management in the DME. This is why companies like Champion Motorsport sell their upgrades in conjunction with a GIAC software upgrade.
Have you worked with any X51 cars?
These cars have a pretty significant gain in the mid range that is quicte noticeable with our software upgrade. There have been independent reviews of our software posted on this forum stating exactly that and more. On the latest model cars (DFI), what people will notice most is the torque gain, in my opinion. The car does pull harder to redline but unless you're measuring that with trap speeds on the road course or using a vbox, it's not going to be as noticeable (when comparing to a forced induction upgrade).
Additionally, any hardware upgrades that you add the car make software upgrades a requirement. Any gains you would make from the hardware you install will be erased by the torque management in the DME. This is why companies like Champion Motorsport sell their upgrades in conjunction with a GIAC software upgrade.
Additionally, any hardware upgrades that you add the car make software upgrades a requirement. Any gains you would make from the hardware you install will be erased by the torque management in the DME. This is why companies like Champion Motorsport sell their upgrades in conjunction with a GIAC software upgrade.
But at the end of the day I guess at the end of the day, "significant" is subjective. No argument there there are some gains.. does 10 HP make me feel as if I have to have it? Not really.. Yeah, it looks as if there is a bit of extra torque in the 3K range.. But again, I'm not sure "significant" is how I feel about it.. I'd characterize it as.. incremental.
Understand that I'm not criticizing in any way and I realize your company sells a quality product... Unfortunately many in the industry are not very forthcoming. And in general I've adopted a general rule that whenever I ask a question and I am asked to PM for more info.. I'm done with them..
But compared to the X51, for 30 HP and other more expensive bolt ons, yeah I'd say a good tune that nets me 10 HP and a little torque boost for $1.8K is probably the first step...
But at the end of the day, there is only so much you can really do with a tune on a NA car.. It is more about optimization and removing margins the OEM didn't exploit. And at the same time I also wonder if that is eating into a safety band of some sort for the antiknock at when using lower based on Octane.
I don't know that, but I find it interesting there is a 10HP delta that exactly tracks the HP curve.. That would tend to indicate to me there is some kind of margin that the OEM left in and I would imagine they did it for a reason and not just to create a market for tuners.
Unfortunately whenever I ask these kinds of questions (which may be way off the mark, but then again that's why I ask questions) I immediately get a "marketing response", either because the marketing face of the company doesn't know or as I usually suspect the products are snake oil...
However I will say I've looked at a couple of tune.. before and afters for NA and objectively... I don't see anything I felt was truly significant and I think the throttle mapping has more to do with the perception of lower end than anything. There is definitely a placebo effect as well.. Probably the only way to ever really be sure would be to have two identical 911's and drive them both to see if there is a real world difference.
Your points are well taken, and I think GIAC in my observation has been more transparent in showing numbers than some of the competitors.. And I also appreciate seeing the Fuel grade used, as that is a scam point that I've seen exploited by more than one company.
But at the end of the day I guess at the end of the day, "significant" is subjective. No argument there there are some gains.. does 10 HP make me feel as if I have to have it? Not really.. Yeah, it looks as if there is a bit of extra torque in the 3K range.. But again, I'm not sure "significant" is how I feel about it.. I'd characterize it as.. incremental.
Understand that I'm not criticizing in any way and I realize your company sells a quality product... Unfortunately many in the industry are not very forthcoming. And in general I've adopted a general rule that whenever I ask a question and I am asked to PM for more info.. I'm done with them..
But compared to the X51, for 30 HP and other more expensive bolt ons, yeah I'd say a good tune that nets me 10 HP and a little torque boost for $1.8K is probably the first step...
But at the end of the day, there is only so much you can really do with a tune on a NA car.. It is more about optimization and removing margins the OEM didn't exploit. And at the same time I also wonder if that is eating into a safety band of some sort for the antiknock at when using lower based on Octane.
I don't know that, but I find it interesting there is a 10HP delta that exactly tracks the HP curve.. That would tend to indicate to me there is some kind of margin that the OEM left in and I would imagine they did it for a reason and not just to create a market for tuners.
Unfortunately whenever I ask these kinds of questions (which may be way off the mark, but then again that's why I ask questions) I immediately get a "marketing response", either because the marketing face of the company doesn't know or as I usually suspect the products are snake oil...
However I will say I've looked at a couple of tune.. before and afters for NA and objectively... I don't see anything I felt was truly significant and I think the throttle mapping has more to do with the perception of lower end than anything. There is definitely a placebo effect as well.. Probably the only way to ever really be sure would be to have two identical 911's and drive them both to see if there is a real world difference.
But at the end of the day I guess at the end of the day, "significant" is subjective. No argument there there are some gains.. does 10 HP make me feel as if I have to have it? Not really.. Yeah, it looks as if there is a bit of extra torque in the 3K range.. But again, I'm not sure "significant" is how I feel about it.. I'd characterize it as.. incremental.
Understand that I'm not criticizing in any way and I realize your company sells a quality product... Unfortunately many in the industry are not very forthcoming. And in general I've adopted a general rule that whenever I ask a question and I am asked to PM for more info.. I'm done with them..
But compared to the X51, for 30 HP and other more expensive bolt ons, yeah I'd say a good tune that nets me 10 HP and a little torque boost for $1.8K is probably the first step...
But at the end of the day, there is only so much you can really do with a tune on a NA car.. It is more about optimization and removing margins the OEM didn't exploit. And at the same time I also wonder if that is eating into a safety band of some sort for the antiknock at when using lower based on Octane.
I don't know that, but I find it interesting there is a 10HP delta that exactly tracks the HP curve.. That would tend to indicate to me there is some kind of margin that the OEM left in and I would imagine they did it for a reason and not just to create a market for tuners.
Unfortunately whenever I ask these kinds of questions (which may be way off the mark, but then again that's why I ask questions) I immediately get a "marketing response", either because the marketing face of the company doesn't know or as I usually suspect the products are snake oil...
However I will say I've looked at a couple of tune.. before and afters for NA and objectively... I don't see anything I felt was truly significant and I think the throttle mapping has more to do with the perception of lower end than anything. There is definitely a placebo effect as well.. Probably the only way to ever really be sure would be to have two identical 911's and drive them both to see if there is a real world difference.
In terms of 10hp/tq being significant, it wouldn't be when there is one small blip at one specific point on the powerband. However, when you have a curve shift, it does pretty well to make the vehicle feel as though it has shed some pounds. As to whether this is significant to someone is subjective. Regarding the torque gains being significant, I am not the only one who has noted that on here:
1.) Review here
2.) Review here
OEMs are set under incredibly strict guidelines for federal emissions, anti-failure, etc.... The stress tests they do to guarantee no failure (I believe they aim for a fraction of 1% in terms of failure rates on engines) on these engines is far beyond the abuse that a normal owner will place upon their own car. With that said, it doesn't mean we go buck wild and make the engine susceptible to failure. I think our reputation will precede us in that we make reliable software solutions It simply means that the OEMs do leave power on the table for various reasons. Reasons that we're able to take advantage of.
The best part is that we've rolled out OBD2 flashing on the 991/991S so DMEs no longer need to be sent here to GIAC for programming. This makes taking advantage of our money back guarantee much more convenient because you can be in and out of the dealer quickly with your car flashed on the same day.
That said, it is something that we can do.
Ill be in touch..I just save the OEM parts and reinstall when it comes time to smog. I would still want to run HFC's.
Dave
Your points are well taken, and I think GIAC in my observation has been more transparent in showing numbers than some of the competitors.. And I also appreciate seeing the Fuel grade used, as that is a scam point that I've seen exploited by more than one company.
But at the end of the day I guess at the end of the day, "significant" is subjective. No argument there there are some gains.. does 10 HP make me feel as if I have to have it? Not really.. Yeah, it looks as if there is a bit of extra torque in the 3K range.. But again, I'm not sure "significant" is how I feel about it.. I'd characterize it as.. incremental.
Understand that I'm not criticizing in any way and I realize your company sells a quality product... Unfortunately many in the industry are not very forthcoming. And in general I've adopted a general rule that whenever I ask a question and I am asked to PM for more info.. I'm done with them..
But compared to the X51, for 30 HP and other more expensive bolt ons, yeah I'd say a good tune that nets me 10 HP and a little torque boost for $1.8K is probably the first step...
But at the end of the day, there is only so much you can really do with a tune on a NA car.. It is more about optimization and removing margins the OEM didn't exploit. And at the same time I also wonder if that is eating into a safety band of some sort for the antiknock at when using lower based on Octane.
I don't know that, but I find it interesting there is a 10HP delta that exactly tracks the HP curve.. That would tend to indicate to me there is some kind of margin that the OEM left in and I would imagine they did it for a reason and not just to create a market for tuners.
Unfortunately whenever I ask these kinds of questions (which may be way off the mark, but then again that's why I ask questions) I immediately get a "marketing response", either because the marketing face of the company doesn't know or as I usually suspect the products are snake oil...
However I will say I've looked at a couple of tune.. before and afters for NA and objectively... I don't see anything I felt was truly significant and I think the throttle mapping has more to do with the perception of lower end than anything. There is definitely a placebo effect as well.. Probably the only way to ever really be sure would be to have two identical 911's and drive them both to see if there is a real world difference.
But at the end of the day I guess at the end of the day, "significant" is subjective. No argument there there are some gains.. does 10 HP make me feel as if I have to have it? Not really.. Yeah, it looks as if there is a bit of extra torque in the 3K range.. But again, I'm not sure "significant" is how I feel about it.. I'd characterize it as.. incremental.
Understand that I'm not criticizing in any way and I realize your company sells a quality product... Unfortunately many in the industry are not very forthcoming. And in general I've adopted a general rule that whenever I ask a question and I am asked to PM for more info.. I'm done with them..
But compared to the X51, for 30 HP and other more expensive bolt ons, yeah I'd say a good tune that nets me 10 HP and a little torque boost for $1.8K is probably the first step...
But at the end of the day, there is only so much you can really do with a tune on a NA car.. It is more about optimization and removing margins the OEM didn't exploit. And at the same time I also wonder if that is eating into a safety band of some sort for the antiknock at when using lower based on Octane.
I don't know that, but I find it interesting there is a 10HP delta that exactly tracks the HP curve.. That would tend to indicate to me there is some kind of margin that the OEM left in and I would imagine they did it for a reason and not just to create a market for tuners.
Unfortunately whenever I ask these kinds of questions (which may be way off the mark, but then again that's why I ask questions) I immediately get a "marketing response", either because the marketing face of the company doesn't know or as I usually suspect the products are snake oil...
However I will say I've looked at a couple of tune.. before and afters for NA and objectively... I don't see anything I felt was truly significant and I think the throttle mapping has more to do with the perception of lower end than anything. There is definitely a placebo effect as well.. Probably the only way to ever really be sure would be to have two identical 911's and drive them both to see if there is a real world difference.
. The gains are mild at best. In regards to the x51 you get a lot more than 30hp, aside from the fact the engine has significant upgrades, you get the PSE, sport chrono, and 3rd radiator.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WheelB
991 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
13
Jul 23, 2018 09:37 PM
WheelB
991 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Sep 3, 2015 10:26 AM





