997 S 0-60 in 4.1 seconds, 1/4 mi 12.6 seconds
Thread Starter
|
Banned for Eternity
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,437
From: Dana Point, CA Appleton, WI
Rep Power: 304
997 S 0-60 in 4.1 seconds, 1/4 mi 12.6 seconds
Amazing numbers put up by Car and Driver for the new Carrera S. Only 1/10 off the GT3's 0-60 run and .2 off the turbo's time (both as run by Car and Driver also).
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 172
From: San Diego, Ca
Rep Power: 28
Re: 997 S 0-60 in 4.1 seconds, 1/4 mi 12.6 seconds
Originally posted by teutonictrio
Amazing numbers put up by Car and Driver for the new Carrera S. Only 1/10 off the GT3's 0-60 run and .2 off the turbo's time (both as run by Car and Driver also).
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Amazing numbers put up by Car and Driver for the new Carrera S. Only 1/10 off the GT3's 0-60 run and .2 off the turbo's time (both as run by Car and Driver also).
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,166
From: here
Rep Power: 150
Re: 997 S 0-60 in 4.1 seconds, 1/4 mi 12.6 seconds
Originally posted by teutonictrio
Amazing numbers put up by Car and Driver for the new Carrera S. Only 1/10 off the GT3's 0-60 run and .2 off the turbo's time (both as run by Car and Driver also).
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Amazing numbers put up by Car and Driver for the new Carrera S. Only 1/10 off the GT3's 0-60 run and .2 off the turbo's time (both as run by Car and Driver also).
Very impressive, and vastly different from factory times and those stated in other road tests, but with a new car, and realizing that p-cars get faster as the engines break in, this is quite an improvement.
Imagine what the 997 TT will do.
Even better, imagine what the 997 TT will do in the hands of Matt Fresh!
Last edited by ben, lj; Oct 10, 2004 at 04:32 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 433
From: USA
Rep Power: 44
Re: Re: 997 S 0-60 in 4.1 seconds, 1/4 mi 12.6 seconds
Originally posted by ben, lj
Those numbers are NOT indicative of 997S performance. The car was a ringer or something else happened. The acceleration increase relative to the changes made (and weight gained) over the 996 w/ X51 are not believable (or possible). How the hell would this car run with the much higher reving (higher HP) GT3? Incidentally, these numbers aren't far off the GT3RS. Yeah, right!
Those numbers are NOT indicative of 997S performance. The car was a ringer or something else happened. The acceleration increase relative to the changes made (and weight gained) over the 996 w/ X51 are not believable (or possible). How the hell would this car run with the much higher reving (higher HP) GT3? Incidentally, these numbers aren't far off the GT3RS. Yeah, right!
Last edited by Rob; Oct 10, 2004 at 09:19 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,160
Rep Power: 68
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 863
From: Anaheim Hills, CA
Rep Power: 57
Originally posted by MrBlonde
Perhaps non OEM rubber was used?
Perhaps non OEM rubber was used?
Rubber with better grip will provide a better 0-60 time but it won't provide a higher trap speed like that. Something is up.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 433
From: USA
Rep Power: 44
Re: 11.9 sec 1/4 mile
Originally posted by PaulF
Rob,
I ran a 12.15 @ 115 in my stock 2002 TT (non x-50). And this was my first time at a dragstrip.
Paul
Rob,
I ran a 12.15 @ 115 in my stock 2002 TT (non x-50). And this was my first time at a dragstrip.
Paul
Paul,
That's a really good time. I should clarify my prior statement: "never seen again in another car magazine test". I fully believe others have run that quick/fast in stock (non X50) Turbos.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PelicanParts.com
997 Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 20, 2015 02:39 PM
PelicanParts.com
997 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 20, 2015 02:38 PM
