996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Europipe v.s. FabSpeed in Stage 2

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 09:14 AM
  #16  
ebaker's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
From: TX, USA
Rep Power: 59
ebaker is infamous around these parts
Zippy, the horsepower and torque curves above don't match.
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #17  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by cjv
Zippy,

I do not install or sell exhausts. I have paid retail for all my exhausts with the exception of the Fabspeed which was sent to my tuner for me to test.

I "tuned" my car for each exhaust. My tests were different than Stephen's. The different exhausts performed a little different in different rpm's. In my test the Fabspeed did produce more power but it was a spike at about 6800 rpm's. The Europipe outperformed it in most of the other ranges. The Europipe 70 mm quiet was the all around better performer on my car. I bought it after my test. I have since gone to the Europipe 85 mm exhaust.
Chad's right on here. I have heard quiet a few reputable people, who sell Fabspeed and not EP or Cargraphic and not EP say that despite Stephen's test, EP made the most power on cars they had tested. Now as Stephen himself admits, different situations/conditions, may warrant different results. Either choice would probably be fine. That said, depending on your current hp on your car, will you notice a difference if you have a 415,450 or 500hp car. Probably not, the hp difference on lower hp cars is not enough to tell a difference. Will Chad tell the difference with his huge hp, probably. As hp/torque increase, the needs for increased flow, decreased backpressure are magnified and those small gains on lightly modified cars transform into larger gains with higher hp cars.

-lou
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 10:09 AM
  #18  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by Zippy
Stephen:

Thanks for your technical explanation of the adaptivve nature of the ECU. Your comment "Go with what works best for your needs" is the problem I face. My needs seem to be split between the 2. The Fabspeed shows the best power between 3500 and 6500 rpm. It seems to be the clear winner in that department. The EuroPipe has an exotic feeling about it and from what i read, a better sound and overall quality. In your opinion, is the smaller area under the curve in the EuroPipe a function of slightly higher backbressure? The flexability of the FabSpeed (bolt on straight pipes for the track) is very appealing!
BTW, just looked over stephen's exhaust test. Here are the numbers to 5000rpm's, although, I know you already have them.


Fabspeed Loud (hp and torque at given rpm)
2500--128hp/252lb ft
3000--190hp/332lb/ft
3500--271hp/407lb/ft
4000--384hp/504lb/ft
4500--447hp/521lb/ft
5000--461hp/484lb/ft

EP Stage 2 loud
2500--145hp/305lb/ft
3000--213hp/372lb/ft
3500--305hp/458lb/ft
4000--409hp/437lb/ft??(europipe said they never saw this kind of drop on their tests)
4500--429hp/500lb/ft
5000--455hp/478lb/ft
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 10:25 AM
  #19  
Colin@PES's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 91
From: Ivyland PA/Morristown NJ
Rep Power: 26
Colin@PES is infamous around these parts
Fabspeed

Fabspeed the only way to go!!!!!!
Beautiful construction and GREAT sound!!!!!
Not to mention great power!!!!


Colin Miller
www.pes-tuning.com
877-697-1688
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #20  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
Originally posted by LSM
BTW, just looked over stephen's exhaust test. Here are the numbers to 5000rpm's, although, I know you already have them.


Fabspeed Loud (hp and torque at given rpm)
2500--128hp/252lb ft
3000--190hp/332lb/ft
3500--271hp/407lb/ft
4000--384hp/504lb/ft
4500--447hp/521lb/ft
5000--461hp/484lb/ft

EP Stage 2 loud
2500--145hp/305lb/ft
3000--213hp/372lb/ft
3500--305hp/458lb/ft
4000--409hp/437lb/ft??(europipe said they never saw this kind of drop on their tests)
4500--429hp/500lb/ft
5000--455hp/478lb/ft
I mentioned this drop off in a post when stephans test first came out. I asked anyone that had owned the EP exhaust and had noticed a 500 rpm off. No one responded. An extreme drop off of that amount would be very noticeable. You would definatly feel this. Not to discount the test but there is something weird about that EP graph. I have asked a few EP owners if they have noticed any 500rpm drop off and not one had noticed this.

Also the graph of the Ruf exhaust was strange also, when I had dynoed the Rufs with my other mods, it showed a much different graph than stephans. There is so many variables when dynoing, that can be schewed.
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 12:57 PM
  #21  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by oak
I mentioned this drop off in a post when stephans test first came out. I asked anyone that had owned the EP exhaust and had noticed a 500 rpm off. No one responded. An extreme drop off of that amount would be very noticeable. You would definatly feel this. Not to discount the test but there is something weird about that EP graph. I have asked a few EP owners if they have noticed any 500rpm drop off and not one had noticed this.

Also the graph of the Ruf exhaust was strange also, when I had dynoed the Rufs with my other mods, it showed a much different graph than stephans. There is so many variables when dynoing, that can be schewed.

When I had the EP installed on my car, I noticed no drop off in power. Th epower delivery seemed linear and pulled stronger and stronger as rpm's went up all the way to redline.

-Lou
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #22  
oak's Avatar
oak
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,741
From: So Bay, LA
Rep Power: 142
oak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud ofoak has much to be proud of
Lou, that's the consensus from everyone I had spoken to about this drop off in power on Stephan graph. Not one person has felt or noticed this, someone had done a done a dyno with the EP and looked much ddifferent. I can't remember who that was.
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 01:11 PM
  #23  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by oak
Lou, that's the consensus from everyone I had spoken to about this drop off in power on Stephan graph. Not one person has felt or noticed this, someone had done a done a dyno with the EP and looked much ddifferent. I can't remember who that was.
Well, for one, EP posts their dyno results on their website. As a matter of fact, the guy who I sold my EP stage 2 loud to, had spoken to Stef at EP who said that on X50 cars they had tested hp gains at more like 30hp instead of the 20 they list for the non-x50 cars. The 30hp was conservative to, Stef said the lowest gain he measured was 30hp on the X50.

BTW, do you or anyone have any idea why the EP stage 2 loud sounds so much different/better, deeper, louder on his X50 car than it did on mine? Its like its two different exhausts.

-Lou
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 03:18 PM
  #24  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
Well gang someone should have dropped me a call. Steff and I had already talked about this and confirmed that one of the wrong copies was posted, then sent and reposted. The corrected numbers for that range were 537 not 437 and the chart that is going to be published looks like this. Apparently the updated copy has not been uploaded. There were several drafts that were being cleaned up and doubled check against my notes. My office accidentally sent the wrong one. I should have noticed this in the original PP, but after 30 days of test, the heat and trying to work at the same time I glanced at it and said, UH Huh send it. So the graph below is the corrected version. I will also post another chart with the Fabspeed sport and the Europipe.
 
Attached Images  
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #25  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Thanks stephen for explanation. Do you know why the same EP stage 2 loud would sound much different on my car than an x50 turbo?

-Lou
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #26  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
Fabspeed Sport and Europipe.

Thanks to the lovely Mrs. PhD for the chart
 
Attached Images  
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #27  
PorschePhd's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,670
Rep Power: 189
PorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond reputePorschePhd has a reputation beyond repute
Mufflers do mature and sound different with time. Also the X50 moves more air than the standard TT. All of these things will change the sound. My Europipe sounded much different then it started out.
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 03:51 PM
  #28  
LSM's Avatar
LSM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,414
Rep Power: 164
LSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of lightLSM is a glorious beacon of light
Originally posted by PorschePhD
Mufflers do mature and sound different with time. Also the X50 moves more air than the standard TT. All of these things will change the sound. My Europipe sounded much different then it started out.

Thanks. Must be the added airflow. I'm tellin you, as crazy as this sounds, my exhaust had like 500 miles on it and I saw them install it on his car and it sounded much different. Louder, meaner, throatier(is that a word). If it sounded like that on my car, I would have never gotten rid of it. Thanks again

-lou
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #29  
Zippy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,787
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Rep Power: 209
Zippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks to the lovely Mrs. PhD for the chart! And also thanks to the lovely Mr. PhD for posting the correct chart. I have been mulling over the wrong data in my head since your research piece on the various exhausts was posted. It's amazing how having accurate data can make a decision that much more clear.

Mike
 
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #30  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Zippy,

At the time I tested the Fabspeed on my car, the car was producing approx. 526 rwhp. A little more than a Stage IV and a little less then the Stage IV GT.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 PM.