996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Thinking of buying a Range Rover

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
john stephanus's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 604
From: seattle
Rep Power: 47
john stephanus is infamous around these parts
Thinking of buying a Range Rover

Guys,

Wondering what input some of you that are more experienced with Rovers have on the '03 model...it is the first year for the new body style. Also what is the price point I should look for on a low mile (< 20k miles) pristine one?

Any other thoughts welcomed...
 

Last edited by john stephanus; Dec 22, 2004 at 06:04 PM.
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 07:04 PM
  #2  
Ruiner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,321
From: Atlanta, GA
Rep Power: 73
Ruiner is infamous around these parts
An incredible vehicle, but it depreciates like crazy (almost all Land Rovers do, actually).
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #3  
Neil@Orton's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,243
From: Atlanta
Rep Power: 72
Neil@Orton is infamous around these parts
Just for you John
 
Attached Images  
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #4  
Ruiner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,321
From: Atlanta, GA
Rep Power: 73
Ruiner is infamous around these parts
Neil, I absolutely love my Disco II. England made a great vehicle no matter how bad the press for Land Rover is.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #5  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
ive heard from mechanics that the range rovers are high maintanance and that they do break down alot.... coming from a mechanic for that dealership... thats the only thing keeping me from buyng one.... I love the look. I also had two other English cars.. Lotus espirit... 1999 and 2000.... they gave me the 2000 cause the first one turned out to be a lemon... If u lease it and dont care about reliability... it might be a car for you... cause I think they hit it on the nail with the new body.... unfortunately the drivetrain is based on a 20+ year old setup... I think they are soon to change it.
just my .02 cents worth...
markski
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
Ruiner's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,321
From: Atlanta, GA
Rep Power: 73
Ruiner is infamous around these parts
Markski, the "new" Range Rover is the offering from BMW. Those started in 2003. They have a 4.4 BMW V8 (same one that was in the 540i I do believe). They should be more reliable than the previous gen as they are basically an X5 with a Range Rover body kit.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:40 PM
  #7  
ESK's Avatar
ESK
Hick from NH
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,398
From: NH
Rep Power: 78
ESK is infamous around these parts
Nearly 8,500 miles on my '04 and not a single issue, problem, squeak or rattle. I would highly recommend it.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by Ruiner
Markski, the "new" Range Rover is the offering from BMW. Those started in 2003. They have a 4.4 BMW V8 (same one that was in the 540i I do believe). They should be more reliable than the previous gen as they are basically an X5 with a Range Rover body kit.
I thought it was coming out in 2005 or something... thanks for the info.... that changes things.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #9  
ypshan's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 28
ypshan is infamous around these parts
Talk to your local owners about the service experience. If you think it takes a long time to get Porsche parts, Land Rover is worse!

Land Rover consistently ranked last in the quality surveys. Recently there was an up tick but they are still way below average.

For the money you will spend on an 03 Range Rover, you may be able to get a new LR3 SE.

Since Land Rovers depreciate like crazy, getting a used one is actually not a bad idea.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:01 PM
  #10  
Sloopy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 558
From: Columbia Ca. JSA
Rep Power: 48
Sloopy is a glorious beacon of lightSloopy is a glorious beacon of lightSloopy is a glorious beacon of lightSloopy is a glorious beacon of lightSloopy is a glorious beacon of light
6000 on my 04 with no issues... Its a great value.

This is a replacment for my 1998 RR with 112,000 miles. Some issues on itk, but few considering miles driven.
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #11  
andreas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 850
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 57
andreas is infamous around these parts
Had an '03 put 20k on it and traded it in and bought an '04. Love them. No problems at all.

Also currently own a '93 that I bought new and kept as a beater

Still have the '04 also and it has 18k on it currently.

GET ONE!!!!!!!!

Andreas
 
Old Dec 22, 2004 | 11:37 PM
  #12  
john stephanus's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 604
From: seattle
Rep Power: 47
john stephanus is infamous around these parts
Thanks for all the input...any ideas on a price point for a low mile '03 or '04?
 
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 12:10 AM
  #13  
andreas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 850
From: Bay Area
Rep Power: 57
andreas is infamous around these parts
When we traded in our '03 the dealer gave us 62K for it and it had 20k on it. they re-sold it for 69K. Would think '04 would be about the same??

not sure though

Andreas
 
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 01:07 AM
  #14  
collin996tt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,105
From: Bay Area, CA
Rep Power: 186
collin996tt is infamous around these parts
Some people hate the Rover driving experience and some, like me, love it. My 5 year old interior is still like new. The view from inside is just unparalleled for driver and passengers.

It's the only truck where you can take it rock climbing in the morning, wash it, and take it to a 5-star hotel/restaurant at night with ease.

<65k would be a good deal. If it's precertified, try to get extended warranty on it.

Hard part is deciding on the color. They all look so good.
 
Old Dec 23, 2004 | 02:48 AM
  #15  
LexdiamonNYC's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 187
From: North NJ
Rep Power: 30
LexdiamonNYC is infamous around these parts
the newer ones are based one BMW's X5, have the same engine and all.........and they're very reliable..........a great car imo.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 AM.