2007 tt

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Rate Thread

Feb 8, 2005 | 07:57 PM

#16

Chordate

Banned

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 6,293

From: New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA

Rep Power: 0

Ahem!

996 Turbo 0-60: 3.8
996 Turbo X50 0-60: 3.7
997 Carrera S 0-60: 3.9

Feb 8, 2005 | 08:28 PM

#17

MJC123

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts: 2,424

From: Dallas, TX; RSF, CA; Lakeside, MT

Rep Power: 129

Quote:

Originally posted by mehrabani1
Ahem!

996 Turbo 0-60: 3.8
996 Turbo X50 0-60: 3.7
997 Carrera S 0-60: 3.9

I just don't believe that time for the S. The Carrera S I drove the other day was NOWHERE near as fast as my old turbo. The S feels slow and numb in comparison.

Feb 9, 2005 | 05:39 PM

#18

techart 996 #3

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 570

Rep Power: 44

techart 996 #3 is infamous around these parts

Re: pic

Quote:

Originally posted by rmrmd1956
997tt

Thats a photoshoped 997 S by Carlos on flat six.

Feb 9, 2005 | 05:42 PM

#19

techart 996 #3

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 570

Rep Power: 44

Quote:

Originally posted by mehrabani1
Ahem!

996 Turbo 0-60: 3.8
996 Turbo X50 0-60: 3.7
997 Carrera S 0-60: 3.9

Really? Why is Porsches figures so much higher?
I thought the 996 TT did it in 4.2?

Feb 9, 2005 | 06:06 PM

#20

Chordate

Banned

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 6,293

From: New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA

Rep Power: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by techart 996 #3
Really? Why is Porsches figures so much higher?
I thought the 996 TT did it in 4.2?

Most companies underrate the potential performance of their cars. Although a few companies, namely Koniensegg and Corvette, overrate the potential performance of their cars.