TT lean past 1 BAR.
Its a second to none ... more precise on controlling the boost ... no boost drop issue no spike issue .. comparing it to the greddy ? u r so mistake by comparing
LOL! I've been there, done that, now I'm happily back to PCs.
Told them exactly what I do with a computer, none of the programs work on this and then they said I can split the the something and run half the way it is and the other half with the system needed to run my other programs.. No thanks, now I am trying to get a laptop that has a serial port..
i was also thinking it might be a problem with a vacuum leak between the MAF and the turbo inlets. so i have air going in without being read by the MAF.
do you think i should check that before i do the test runs. would that kind of leak also have the effect of lowering idle do you think? the car idles at about 850 rpm. the tune on car is supposed to idle at 1100 rpm.
do you think i should check that before i do the test runs. would that kind of leak also have the effect of lowering idle do you think? the car idles at about 850 rpm. the tune on car is supposed to idle at 1100 rpm.
My educated guess is yes, since fuel is metered by air flowing past MAF and if you have air coming in after the MAF it would not be taken into account and you could have lean fuel condition.
See if Todd can provide you with a MAFLess tune and then get rid off you MAF's.
See if Todd can provide you with a MAFLess tune and then get rid off you MAF's.
I just did a run. the hks evc read boost at 1.05 bar but on the datalogging i got up to 1.13 bar. the injectors seem to be running at max cycle 27.8 ms at 6000rpm and 22.15 at 7000rpm.
so next up is fueling but im still worried about maf. I dont know how a mafless tune will hold up in weather where it goes up to 50 degrees C in the summer and 0 degrees at night in the winter. any thoughts?
so next up is fueling but im still worried about maf. I dont know how a mafless tune will hold up in weather where it goes up to 50 degrees C in the summer and 0 degrees at night in the winter. any thoughts?
get the injectors and a tune.. maybe some decent ICs and leave it alone... Ive set up many guys like that and they love it.. maybe add the intake piping
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
something is wrong if your your injection time is correct
120/6000*1000 = 20 max injector time but you are at 27.8
120/7000*1000 = 17.14 max injector time but you are at 22.15
either case you are way over 100%duty cycle.
You sure need to upgrade your fuel injectors.
Talk to Todd.K and seek his advice.
120/6000*1000 = 20 max injector time but you are at 27.8
120/7000*1000 = 17.14 max injector time but you are at 22.15
either case you are way over 100%duty cycle.
You sure need to upgrade your fuel injectors.
Talk to Todd.K and seek his advice.
I just did a run. the hks evc read boost at 1.05 bar but on the datalogging i got up to 1.13 bar. the injectors seem to be running at max cycle 27.8 ms at 6000rpm and 22.15 at 7000rpm.
so next up is fueling but im still worried about maf. I dont know how a mafless tune will hold up in weather where it goes up to 50 degrees C in the summer and 0 degrees at night in the winter. any thoughts?
so next up is fueling but im still worried about maf. I dont know how a mafless tune will hold up in weather where it goes up to 50 degrees C in the summer and 0 degrees at night in the winter. any thoughts?
Last edited by venkatreddytx; Oct 9, 2010 at 04:44 PM.
I dunno.. i think i saw a 996 with mafless setup for some one here in 6speed but am not pretty sure.





