996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Mass Air Flow (CFM)

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 11 votes, 4.64 average.
 
Old Oct 28, 2010 | 06:37 AM
  #1  
winnigt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
Mass Air Flow (HFM)

Can someone share with me his Mass Air Flow (HFM) from different turbos and boost?

What i just already have is with durametric datalog

K24 oem 1,1 bar max hfm 1366
K24 /20G 1,58 bar max hfm 1900
997 tt VTG flashed 1,3bar 1450 hfm

what i am looking for is some cfm values from k24/18G with boost 1,1 /1,2 or 1,3 bar or other turbos (bone stock too)
 

Last edited by winnigt2; Oct 28, 2010 at 07:06 AM.
Old Mar 20, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Wanted to bring this back up as I've done some logs as well. It would appear that the stock 996tt MAF is maxing in the 1366 area as I can crank boost with no change in this value between 1.0 and 1.3 bar. Thoughts?
 
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 08:05 AM
  #3  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by earl3
Wanted to bring this back up as I've done some logs as well. It would appear that the stock 996tt MAF is maxing in the 1366 area as I can crank boost with no change in this value between 1.0 and 1.3 bar. Thoughts?
The ECU limits to 1366. You need a flash to change that.
 
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 10:39 AM
  #4  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
The ECU limits to 1366. You need a flash to change that.
It's a flashed 16g setup. If max MAF voltage corresponds to ~1366 and the MAF tube diameter is fixed, how a flash will fix that?

I noticed both of our VEs took a dump after about 5500 rpm, was your MAF sitting at 1366 as well? It looks like all the other cars in that thread were running non-stock MAFs (except for the 997 which has 2).
 
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 10:55 AM
  #5  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by earl3
It's a flashed 16g setup. If max MAF voltage corresponds to ~1366 and the MAF tube diameter is fixed, how a flash will fix that?

I noticed both of our VEs took a dump after about 5500 rpm, was your MAF sitting at 1366 as well? It looks like all the other cars in that thread were running non-stock MAFs (except for the 997 which has 2).
I am not an engine tuner - I don't even play one on TV. The following is my understanding of the issue, and may not be correct.

The limit of 1366 (in my logs, I have seen 1377 a couple of times, but mostly 1366) is programmed into the ECU as a limit. That doesn't mean that is the maximum value that can be measured by the maf, but instead the maximum value that is allowed by the ECU. That could be changed in software.

However, the issue is that you have to have enough fueling to be able to handle the additional air flow without creating an overly lean condition. That is one of the reasons that the limit is imposed. If you have upgraded the fuel system, e.g., with injectors and fuel pump, then you could handle more air, and a tuner could remap the ECU accordingly.

Jon
 
Old Mar 21, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
earl3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 823
From: Mojave, CA
Rep Power: 133
earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !earl3 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
I am not an engine tuner - I don't even play one on TV. The following is my understanding of the issue, and may not be correct.

The limit of 1366 (in my logs, I have seen 1377 a couple of times, but mostly 1366) is programmed into the ECU as a limit. That doesn't mean that is the maximum value that can be measured by the maf, but instead the maximum value that is allowed by the ECU. That could be changed in software.
yep, seeing the exact same thing! The flashed X50 in the VE thread also had the same values

However, the issue is that you have to have enough fueling to be able to handle the additional air flow without creating an overly lean condition. That is one of the reasons that the limit is imposed. If you have upgraded the fuel system, e.g., with injectors and fuel pump, then you could handle more air, and a tuner could remap the ECU accordingly.

Jon
thanks for the input, I do have 62 lb injectors. I will "max" the MAF at 1 bar but at 1.3 bar with the MAF still reading the same, the AFRs (and timing) are still spot on and the car is 1.5s quicker 60-130. I'll check with Tony about it but I have a hunch the VE's for stock MAF 996tts dont mean much. I seem to remember reading somewhere that the MAF isnt really used at WOT...
 
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 04:39 PM
  #7  
ant_8u's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,751
From: Warwickshire, England
Rep Power: 141
ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !
Resurrection for more people's input
 
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
996ttalot's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 226
From: Surrey, England
Rep Power: 47
996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute996ttalot has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by ant_8u
Resurrection for more people's input
Do not rely on MAF figures above 4000rpm on WOT. Basically the DME will put in a value on a mapped car since it then uses temps, pressure etc.

This is why sometimes you will see high figures on stage 1 stuff, against stage 2 and so on.

It is a shame, because it could be useful in other calculations.
 
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #9  
ant_8u's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,751
From: Warwickshire, England
Rep Power: 141
ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !
So, is there any way of logging the amount of air flow?
 
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 06:12 PM
  #10  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Blind calibration is what we call with mafs that are pegged to the max... the blow thru reads 2.5 times that...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Nov 6, 2011 | 06:55 PM
  #11  
ant_8u's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,751
From: Warwickshire, England
Rep Power: 141
ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !ant_8u Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Blind calibration is what we call with mafs that are pegged to the max... the blow thru reads 2.5 times that...


I was interested to hear if there's anything which indicates how much air my engine is flowing

I guess this way isn't the right way
 
Old Nov 6, 2011 | 08:52 PM
  #12  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
997tt, tuned 63.5 mm vtg, 1.3 bar, 1655 kg/h.
 
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 02:58 AM
  #13  
GT2996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 78
From: Brussels
Rep Power: 21
GT2996TT has a spectacular aura aboutGT2996TT has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Blind calibration is what we call with mafs that are pegged to the max... the blow thru reads 2.5 times that...
But when pegged at 2.5 times that, durametric still only shows 1366kg/h right?
 
Old Nov 7, 2011 | 06:31 AM
  #14  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by GT2996TT
But when pegged at 2.5 times that, durametric still only shows 1366kg/h right?
no..... on our blow thru maf it will read higher...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Nov 7, 2011 | 07:55 AM
  #15  
winnigt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
no..... on our blow thru maf it will read higher...
a better measurement system at high airflow with a blown thru and a different maf....stock maf with stock diameter and very high airflow is blind?

greater maf housing diameter is the reasons for this or a another maf (or both)

can you build a adaption from a existing ecu file with stock maf to a blown thru ore do you need a complete new calibration
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 11 votes, 4.64 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.