996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Effect of temperature on tourque/hp

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2010 | 05:36 PM
  #1  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Effect of temperature on tourque/hp

I collected some Durametric data back in August, when it was really hot. Collected some more today, when the air temps are a lot lower. The figure shows results for 4th gear pulls. Torque and hp are about 5% lower on the hot day.

Looks like intercoolers are in my future!

jon
 
Attached Images  
Old Nov 3, 2010 | 05:53 PM
  #2  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
I collected some Durametric data back in August, when it was really hot. Collected some more today, when the air temps are a lot lower. The figure shows results for 4th gear pulls. Torque and hp are about 5% lower on the hot day.

Looks like intercoolers are in my future!

jon

jon, what IC's you running. what other stuff do you have on the car. Boost pressure? etc. did you measure AFR's and timing?
 
Old Nov 3, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #3  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Prche951
jon, what IC's you running. what other stuff do you have on the car. Boost pressure? etc. did you measure AFR's and timing?
Dennis,

Sure, I measured all of that stuff. I'm one of Kevin's boys.

Stock 996 TT intercoolers, Milltek exhaust. Stage 2A (K16/997GT2)

The lambda's were about the same, 0.73 vs 0.74. Mass air flow is higher at the lower temperature (maxed at 1366). Boost is a bit higher too. Timing doesn't seem much different. IAT's were running up to 60C under boost back in August.

Jon
 
Old Nov 3, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #4  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
I'll share some information, maybe a little off topic but interesting.

In 2003 we setup our 996tt with a double jacketed Y Pipe and IC sprayers. We injected CO2 into the jacketed wall on both sides. It came in the Y Pipe, exited the Y Pipe and was then routed to sprayers on the intercoolers.

We also had sensors set up on both sides of the ICs and a controller that monitored inlet and outlet of the IC as well as providing the delta.

The delta was hugh when the ambient air temps were 90 degrees F. Surprisingly, it was either 65 or 70 degrees F ambient (I can't remember), the delta was all but non existent. As the ambient dropped from 90 to 65/70 the difference in the charged air delta became less and less.
 

Last edited by cjv; Nov 3, 2010 at 08:38 PM.
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #5  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
Dennis,

Sure, I measured all of that stuff. I'm one of Kevin's boys.

Stock 996 TT intercoolers, Milltek exhaust. Stage 2A (K16/997GT2)

The lambda's were about the same, 0.73 vs 0.74. Mass air flow is higher at the lower temperature (maxed at 1366). Boost is a bit higher too. Timing doesn't seem much different. IAT's were running up to 60C under boost back in August.

Jon



Interesting enough when I had the stge 2a, I switched from stock IC's to my B6's and I gained about 2 mph trap speed. And did not loose any speed over 2 hours of doing runs.
D
 
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 05:20 PM
  #6  
winnigt2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
Dennis,

Sure, I measured all of that stuff. I'm one of Kevin's boys.

Stock 996 TT intercoolers, Milltek exhaust. Stage 2A (K16/997GT2)

The lambda's were about the same, 0.73 vs 0.74. Mass air flow is higher at the lower temperature (maxed at 1366). Boost is a bit higher too. Timing doesn't seem much different. IAT's were running up to 60C under boost back in August.

Jon
what boost did ultimate Motorwerks on Stage 2A ? 1,15bar
 
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 05:31 PM
  #7  
Prche951's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,214
From: Colorado
Rep Power: 398
Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !Prche951 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by winnigt2
what boost did ultimate Motorwerks on Stage 2A ? 1,15bar
1.3 bar at 91 octane
 
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #8  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Prche951

Interesting enough when I had the stge 2a, I switched from stock IC's to my B6's and I gained about 2 mph trap speed. And did not loose any speed over 2 hours of doing runs.
D
This makes sense... with stock intercoolers back in August, I was seeing IAT over 60C after a pull in fourth gear. Better intercoolers should decrease that and help top speed.
 
Old Nov 4, 2010 | 05:52 PM
  #9  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by winnigt2
what boost did ultimate Motorwerks on Stage 2A ? 1,15bar
The highest boost in the data above was 1.24 bar. I've never seen 1.3, and don't really want to with my current configuration. There is more performance available from these turbos, but I don't have the fueling to get there with stock fuel pump, rails, and injectors.

Max boost and peak hp aren't very good indicators of performance. The load/hp-rpm curves tell you what your car is laying down. Someone sent me a Durametric data file from his car, which is shown below compared to mine. Note that the max hp is the same for both, but the curves from my car are higher over the entire usable rpm range.

IMHO, these curves are what people should be looking at when they compare tunes and turbos.

Jon
 
Attached Images  
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 04:55 AM
  #10  
winnigt2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by FAST FWD
The highest boost in the data above was 1.24 bar. I've never seen 1.3, and don't really want to with my current configuration. There is more performance available from these turbos, but I don't have the fueling to get there with stock fuel pump, rails, and injectors.

Max boost and peak hp aren't very good indicators of performance. The load/hp-rpm curves tell you what your car is laying down. Someone sent me a Durametric data file from his car, which is shown below compared to mine. Note that the max hp is the same for both, but the curves from my car are higher over the entire usable rpm range.

IMHO, these curves are what people should be looking at when they compare tunes and turbos.

Jon
very good performance at this boost and temp....your AFR`s made with a 5bar FPR
 
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 06:09 AM
  #11  
ShokWaveRider's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 548
From: St. Augustine, Florida
Rep Power: 45
ShokWaveRider is a name known to allShokWaveRider is a name known to allShokWaveRider is a name known to allShokWaveRider is a name known to allShokWaveRider is a name known to allShokWaveRider is a name known to all
I have found that H20/Meth Injection helps a lot with internal temps, and keeps them down at higher boost levels.

SWR
 
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 07:08 AM
  #12  
FAST FWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,157
From: Indiana
Rep Power: 112
FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !FAST FWD Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by winnigt2
very good performance at this boost and temp....your AFR`s made with a 5bar FPR
Correct, I do have a 5 bar FPR.

Interesting side note... We had to detune a little back in April because the Injector duty cycles were getting to be too high (105% in some cases). Later discovered a leak in the fuel pump hose, and am now back to the original tune duty cycles max 90%.

Jon
 
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #13  
rdss's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,018
From: el salvador
Rep Power: 147
rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !rdss Is a GOD !
Very usefull info about I/C's Jon,thank you very much.I need better I/C's but still saving for them.Hard times.
 
Old Nov 5, 2010 | 01:25 PM
  #14  
winnigt2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 610
From: germany
Rep Power: 64
winnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond reputewinnigt2 has a reputation beyond repute
it is a great advantage to have aftermarket IC.....and you gain more if your ECU is progammed to this IC, a little more timing ore AFR are possible...more efficient engine.... as we can see in your thread

Winfried
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vividracing
991 Turbo
23
Oct 2, 2015 02:23 PM
ModBargains.com
996 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Oct 1, 2015 11:48 AM
PelicanParts.com
911
0
Sep 28, 2015 04:26 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.