Hard to say. It's not peaky, but that may be a function of the type of dyno being used. When my car was a K24/18G car (with every other bolt-on), it made 600whp on a Dynojet at 1.3 BAR. The graphs look somewhat similar.

Regardless, no K24 based turbo will make 686 whp at 1.1 BAR.

 

I don't have my old Dyno sheet, but it did look somewhat like that after I added the straight pipes and seemingly lost a bit of torque.

The curve looks pretty darn smooth though.

 

Do you guys think that the dyno numbers might possibly have correction factors already added? 686 bhp x 0.82(18%loss) = 560 whp. which makes more sense.... Could they have put the correction factor in already?

 

They got 844whp with the same car before, so I think there are some other things wrong with it.

 

Mmh, come on...as a matter of fact, K24's do choke at about 30-32 lb/minute, which on our cars gives power in the ball park of 600 crank HP.

So, IMO, there's no way a K24 equipped TT would dyno much more than 500WHP.

These turbos phisically cannot flow that much.

This is a repost, but it may be interesting for the discussion:


K24


GT28RS


GT3071R


16g


20g



Sorry I cannot find the 18g map right now.

 

choke is such a mean word

We live in a kinder more politically correct world. How about K24's are winners, they just don't win as often

 

Did I use the word "choke" in the wrong way? Sorry I have troubles with english sometimes..

Well, maybe " K24s are near the choking line on the compressor map at those flow rates" is a better sentence..

 

Nah!!! Choke is the right word