Highest HP Modified K24 Based Engine - Page 5 - 6SpeedOnline

Apr 22, 2011 | 03:45 PM

#61

markski@markskituning

Basic Sponsor

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 9,730

From: CHICAGO

Rep Power: 604

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunir

Markski buddy how goes it

?

I thought Blouch was doing billet or some sort of new wheel upgrade for the 18 and 20g upgrades on the X50's K24 turbos?

I thought you were referring to the 18gs or the 20g... these are not billets.

__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

Apr 22, 2011 | 04:38 PM

#62

c32AMG-DTM

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 650

From: Philadelphia, PA

Rep Power: 107

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunir

Markski buddy how goes it

?

I thought Blouch was doing billet or some sort of new wheel upgrade for the 18 and 20g upgrades on the X50's K24 turbos?

They are - isn't it mentioned earlier in this very thread? 18GXT and 20GXT are billet wheel upgrades from the old 18G and 20G cast wheels.

There was also mention (in the linked thread) of a 16GXT for replacing a 16G... interesting for the K16 guys to consider...

Apr 23, 2011 | 11:18 AM

#63

robmd99

Registered User

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 3,597

From: Texas

Rep Power: 205

Quote:

Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning

I thought you were referring to the 18gs or the 20g... these are not billets.

Marek
Congrats on one of your builds being in Porsche Magazine! It was a very nice write up.
Robert

Apr 25, 2011 | 01:33 AM

#64

1JDM911

Registered User

Joined: May 2009

Posts: 879

From: ( . )( . )

Rep Power: 67

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1JDM911

damn, it's frustrated that i see you guys making these magical #'s, i've got the 24/18g w/ max'ed supporting mods (minus meth inj) but still just pulling 500rwhp on a wheels-off dynopack w/ 91 pump @ 1.2bar... changing the plugs right now to see if things will improve (having miss-firing in low rpms between 2k~3k, and also a few idle-drops), but i can't imaging how low of the # would be on an AWD mustang... sigh...

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmoores

On 91 octane pump fuel those numbers aren't all that bad.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1JDM911

on an AWD mustang dyno though, right? but mine was on the wheel-off dynapack RWD dyno... shouldn't it have higher readings with 0 friction AND just RWD?

btw, my car's a tip, would that also explain the lower #'s?