Looking for 700whp
Okay maybe you should stop looking for hp and talk performance. And before anyone jumps on me remember two things - one that I was probably one of the first to support USA products via Todd and Markski and secondly that my company now works with Markski.
I did run a 20g set up with all supporting mods and this was independently verified at Bruntingthrope (2 mile straight in middle of England) by 911&Porsche World magazine as quicker than Maclaren F1 and Buggati V on the same track. Yes I know that the new Buggati is quicker and so on. But you can only compare on the same circuit and this is a slow track, on an incline for the best part of 1.2 miles and so on.
You can see the numbers at http://www.nineexcellence.com/news/f...4140a15-7.html
And that was not me driving it that day. The guy stopped at 205.6 after just 1.19 miles and ran 22.5 seconds to 300kph. He had a very slow start. On the same day I ran 5.85 to 100mph. But it was about him driving and not me.
Anyway, the engine was stripped last week and all that was done on stock bottom. The engine was perfect after 8k mileage at 1.5 bar on vpower99 (USA = 94/5approx). The car has 85k mileage with the last 40k mileage in various stages of tune.
Now we are putting on a custom kit from Markski and the kit will be called 9E911. It will run 911 hp on vpower99. Not race gas, standard pump 94/95 USA.
Our target it 16-18secs 0-300kph.
Top speed is 219mph. Our target is 205mph in one mile, since it is on a 1.37% incline to 1.2 miles approx.
On the previous kit, we ran 209mph (gps verified).
And we are building the motor - pauter rods, cometic gaskets, racewear studs/bolts etc.
We are leaving it at 3.6litre. See no reason to change since that is how the engine was designed.
We will run in an event on 14th May.
So what I would say, is set yourself a target of performance, not hp. That can be 60-130mph, or 0-300kph.
Ken
I did run a 20g set up with all supporting mods and this was independently verified at Bruntingthrope (2 mile straight in middle of England) by 911&Porsche World magazine as quicker than Maclaren F1 and Buggati V on the same track. Yes I know that the new Buggati is quicker and so on. But you can only compare on the same circuit and this is a slow track, on an incline for the best part of 1.2 miles and so on.
You can see the numbers at http://www.nineexcellence.com/news/f...4140a15-7.html
And that was not me driving it that day. The guy stopped at 205.6 after just 1.19 miles and ran 22.5 seconds to 300kph. He had a very slow start. On the same day I ran 5.85 to 100mph. But it was about him driving and not me.
Anyway, the engine was stripped last week and all that was done on stock bottom. The engine was perfect after 8k mileage at 1.5 bar on vpower99 (USA = 94/5approx). The car has 85k mileage with the last 40k mileage in various stages of tune.
Now we are putting on a custom kit from Markski and the kit will be called 9E911. It will run 911 hp on vpower99. Not race gas, standard pump 94/95 USA.
Our target it 16-18secs 0-300kph.
Top speed is 219mph. Our target is 205mph in one mile, since it is on a 1.37% incline to 1.2 miles approx.
On the previous kit, we ran 209mph (gps verified).
And we are building the motor - pauter rods, cometic gaskets, racewear studs/bolts etc.
We are leaving it at 3.6litre. See no reason to change since that is how the engine was designed.
We will run in an event on 14th May.
So what I would say, is set yourself a target of performance, not hp. That can be 60-130mph, or 0-300kph.
Ken
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,021
From: Italy
Rep Power: 86
Anyway, the engine was stripped last week and all that was done on stock bottom. The engine was perfect after 8k mileage at 1.5 bar on vpower99 (USA = 94/5approx). The car has 85k mileage with the last 40k mileage in various stages of tune.
Wish you to accomplish your (insane) future targets!
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,481
Rep Power: 707
996 alot , has a point everyone always focuses on horsepower , but some forget about power under the curve ,yeah your car can be peaky and hit high Hp some where in the power band they die off , as oppose power under the curve...
if some of you remember that old porsche tuner shootout , where protomotive beat everyone running less horsepower..
if some of you remember that old porsche tuner shootout , where protomotive beat everyone running less horsepower..
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
From: France
Rep Power: 0
Okay maybe you should stop looking for hp and talk performance. And before anyone jumps on me remember two things - one that I was probably one of the first to support USA products via Todd and Markski and secondly that my company now works with Markski.
I did run a 20g set up with all supporting mods and this was independently verified at Bruntingthrope (2 mile straight in middle of England) by 911&Porsche World magazine as quicker than Maclaren F1 and Buggati V on the same track. Yes I know that the new Buggati is quicker and so on. But you can only compare on the same circuit and this is a slow track, on an incline for the best part of 1.2 miles and so on.
You can see the numbers at http://www.nineexcellence.com/news/f...4140a15-7.html
And that was not me driving it that day. The guy stopped at 205.6 after just 1.19 miles and ran 22.5 seconds to 300kph. He had a very slow start. On the same day I ran 5.85 to 100mph. But it was about him driving and not me.
Anyway, the engine was stripped last week and all that was done on stock bottom. The engine was perfect after 8k mileage at 1.5 bar on vpower99 (USA = 94/5approx). The car has 85k mileage with the last 40k mileage in various stages of tune.
Now we are putting on a custom kit from Markski and the kit will be called 9E911. It will run 911 hp on vpower99. Not race gas, standard pump 94/95 USA.
Our target it 16-18secs 0-300kph.
Top speed is 219mph. Our target is 205mph in one mile, since it is on a 1.37% incline to 1.2 miles approx.
On the previous kit, we ran 209mph (gps verified).
And we are building the motor - pauter rods, cometic gaskets, racewear studs/bolts etc.
We are leaving it at 3.6litre. See no reason to change since that is how the engine was designed.
We will run in an event on 14th May.
So what I would say, is set yourself a target of performance, not hp. That can be 60-130mph, or 0-300kph.
Ken
I did run a 20g set up with all supporting mods and this was independently verified at Bruntingthrope (2 mile straight in middle of England) by 911&Porsche World magazine as quicker than Maclaren F1 and Buggati V on the same track. Yes I know that the new Buggati is quicker and so on. But you can only compare on the same circuit and this is a slow track, on an incline for the best part of 1.2 miles and so on.
You can see the numbers at http://www.nineexcellence.com/news/f...4140a15-7.html
And that was not me driving it that day. The guy stopped at 205.6 after just 1.19 miles and ran 22.5 seconds to 300kph. He had a very slow start. On the same day I ran 5.85 to 100mph. But it was about him driving and not me.
Anyway, the engine was stripped last week and all that was done on stock bottom. The engine was perfect after 8k mileage at 1.5 bar on vpower99 (USA = 94/5approx). The car has 85k mileage with the last 40k mileage in various stages of tune.
Now we are putting on a custom kit from Markski and the kit will be called 9E911. It will run 911 hp on vpower99. Not race gas, standard pump 94/95 USA.
Our target it 16-18secs 0-300kph.
Top speed is 219mph. Our target is 205mph in one mile, since it is on a 1.37% incline to 1.2 miles approx.
On the previous kit, we ran 209mph (gps verified).
And we are building the motor - pauter rods, cometic gaskets, racewear studs/bolts etc.
We are leaving it at 3.6litre. See no reason to change since that is how the engine was designed.
We will run in an event on 14th May.
So what I would say, is set yourself a target of performance, not hp. That can be 60-130mph, or 0-300kph.
Ken
What is ur 100-200 and 200-300kmh...if u don't mind of course?
Of course you can go faster between 100-200 and 200-300 on dedicated runs. And I wasn't driving the car. The editor of the magazine was over 1 sec slower to 160kph that me on the day.
Here is the graph from that day.
Last edited by 996ttalot; Apr 26, 2011 at 08:12 AM.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 39
From: Vienna
Rep Power: 17
@996ttalot
Ok you talk about performance and the performance of your car is great!
But: in the artikle you talk also about hp an with this 100-200 and 200-300 times I cant believe that your car has 800hp!
My car (996 Gt2) had 640hp on the crank and maybe with better conditions of the fans it can get 700Ps and my personal best was 5,2 sec. 100-200 km/h...
i run 1,4bar of max. boost!
Ok you talk about performance and the performance of your car is great!
But: in the artikle you talk also about hp an with this 100-200 and 200-300 times I cant believe that your car has 800hp!
My car (996 Gt2) had 640hp on the crank and maybe with better conditions of the fans it can get 700Ps and my personal best was 5,2 sec. 100-200 km/h...
i run 1,4bar of max. boost!
@996ttalot
Ok you talk about performance and the performance of your car is great!
But: in the artikle you talk also about hp an with this 100-200 and 200-300 times I cant believe that your car has 800hp!
My car (996 Gt2) had 640hp on the crank and maybe with better conditions of the fans it can get 700Ps and my personal best was 5,2 sec. 100-200 km/h...
i run 1,4bar of max. boost!
Ok you talk about performance and the performance of your car is great!
But: in the artikle you talk also about hp an with this 100-200 and 200-300 times I cant believe that your car has 800hp!
My car (996 Gt2) had 640hp on the crank and maybe with better conditions of the fans it can get 700Ps and my personal best was 5,2 sec. 100-200 km/h...
i run 1,4bar of max. boost!
However, several points
1) The car is a tiptronic so crank hp to whp is approx 25-25% loss, not the same as manual which is around 12-15%.
2) The numbers on that day was on an incline of 1.37%, not your normal 2-2.99% decline that everyone runs
3) The car weighed with driver and fuel on the day @ 1690kg - a lot more weight than yours I would guess
4) I have beaten your personal best time many times when just trying to perform a 100-200kph time.
The fact that it beat the Veyron from 150-200mph shows the strength.
Finally and probably a better proof of hp would be the 139.6mph @ 10.8 seconds with 1660kg weight. I would say that is pretty close to 800hp.
Last edited by 996ttalot; Apr 26, 2011 at 10:52 AM.
One last point - if you look at the 9ff r1000 which runs 17 seconds 0-300kph, it actually takes 8.4 seconds to run the first 160kph.
100-200kph is too short an increment to measure hp. However clearly it is a measure that you can compare cars by, just like 60-130. But you can have a car that is slower 100-200 and yet have more hp.
100-200kph is too short an increment to measure hp. However clearly it is a measure that you can compare cars by, just like 60-130. But you can have a car that is slower 100-200 and yet have more hp.
Hey Guys,,Can any of you big hitters PLEASE take a look at the thread I started about dual fuel pump kits,,,,,Thank You....I would really appreciate it,,,I am stuck..
..Have a great day...
..Have a great day...
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 39
From: Vienna
Rep Power: 17
As I was saying here in lie the issue with hp.
However, several points
1) The car is a tiptronic so crank hp to whp is approx 25-25% loss, not the same as manual which is around 12-15%.
2) The numbers on that day was on an incline of 1.37%, not your normal 2-2.99% decline that everyone runs
3) The car weighed with driver and fuel on the day @ 1690kg - a lot more weight than yours I would guess
4) I have beaten your personal best time many times when just trying to perform a 100-200kph time.
The fact that it beat the Veyron from 150-200mph shows the strength.
Finally and probably a better proof of hp would be the 139.6mph @ 10.8 seconds with 1660kg weight. I would say that is pretty close to 800hp.
However, several points
1) The car is a tiptronic so crank hp to whp is approx 25-25% loss, not the same as manual which is around 12-15%.
2) The numbers on that day was on an incline of 1.37%, not your normal 2-2.99% decline that everyone runs
3) The car weighed with driver and fuel on the day @ 1690kg - a lot more weight than yours I would guess
4) I have beaten your personal best time many times when just trying to perform a 100-200kph time.
The fact that it beat the Veyron from 150-200mph shows the strength.
Finally and probably a better proof of hp would be the 139.6mph @ 10.8 seconds with 1660kg weight. I would say that is pretty close to 800hp.
Do you have a *.dbn file of some of your runs that were better than 5,19 from 100 to 200?
I was driving 4th gear only for this run
I
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
From: France
Rep Power: 0
100-200 was 5,74 and 200-300kph was 13.13, 100-320 was 18.20, 100-330 was 21.27
Of course you can go faster between 100-200 and 200-300 on dedicated runs. And I wasn't driving the car. The editor of the magazine was over 1 sec slower to 160kph that me on the day.
Here is the graph from that day.
Of course you can go faster between 100-200 and 200-300 on dedicated runs. And I wasn't driving the car. The editor of the magazine was over 1 sec slower to 160kph that me on the day.
Here is the graph from that day.
Have u ever think to try MS109 or C16?
Ur car ran right now ran almost as quick as tip 997tt w/modded vtgs on racegas or meth/pumpgas mix which should around 640whp
Last edited by Boostholic; Apr 27, 2011 at 04:17 AM.
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
From: France
Rep Power: 0
I believe he has built tip tranny by MKB which made the car shifting damn quick