Big HP League Runs IPD+TB
Wow this is a nice thread. The plenum does more then one job.
1) place to mount the tb
2) connect the two intake halves
Now here is what I have learned. The tb needs to flow into the plenum not just be a tee connection (stock form) there needs to be a nice radius to help direct air flow not just drive it into the back of the plenum then spill over it to the halves. The next part is the two intake halves re verb between each other. This maybe more important the the size of the tb. I know if John is going to do some testing we will know a little more. A little quick math and 860 rwhp is about 1500 cfm. So I would say the stock black intake halves are good for 750cfm each so unless the stock tb and plenum can flow that it would be the weak link there based on what I have seen with my motor.
1) place to mount the tb
2) connect the two intake halves
Now here is what I have learned. The tb needs to flow into the plenum not just be a tee connection (stock form) there needs to be a nice radius to help direct air flow not just drive it into the back of the plenum then spill over it to the halves. The next part is the two intake halves re verb between each other. This maybe more important the the size of the tb. I know if John is going to do some testing we will know a little more. A little quick math and 860 rwhp is about 1500 cfm. So I would say the stock black intake halves are good for 750cfm each so unless the stock tb and plenum can flow that it would be the weak link there based on what I have seen with my motor.
Here's a picture of the new (GT2 I think) inlet manifolds
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
Yeh nobody changes intakes or even talks about them. In American hop up communites it's one of the first and easiest things to do. Its unfortunate that the first thing air hits after entering the TB is the back wall of the T plenium! Im sure the IPD one does a good job smoothing things out. But who knows what the intake runners can or do flow!? They may be the limit and may need attention. The same for the heads! Building the ideal motor I would certainly port my heads, particularly with larger displacement. Lets assume you can get the air to them head flow is ultra important and i cant believe people arent doing it while the engines are apart. If you think the vendors are porting your heads ur wrong! They are sending them out. Its a closely guarded art and anyone known for porting can port these heads too and give you flow bench numbers. I would also do a custom intake with larger runners that I'm sure any fab shop could make. I would run the shortest pre turbo intake system with the gentlest curves and most uniform diameter possible. The most
Important factor for volume of flow is tube diameter but tube length is important too. Ohm's law for all u science guys. A long length system like we see from the factory is an issue! From air intake to TB is quite a tortuous and convoluted journey. Air encounters drag along the entire surface of the tube and slows and disrupts air flow. Also the twist, kimks, turns, and upsize/down size it encounters really produces turbulent non laminar flow. But this is all perfect world stuff so if money is no object its something to think about. If money is an issue its just something to talk about! I expect this is one reason all the fender intake guys immediately notice much quicker throttle response and spool. There are a lot of factors.
Important factor for volume of flow is tube diameter but tube length is important too. Ohm's law for all u science guys. A long length system like we see from the factory is an issue! From air intake to TB is quite a tortuous and convoluted journey. Air encounters drag along the entire surface of the tube and slows and disrupts air flow. Also the twist, kimks, turns, and upsize/down size it encounters really produces turbulent non laminar flow. But this is all perfect world stuff so if money is no object its something to think about. If money is an issue its just something to talk about! I expect this is one reason all the fender intake guys immediately notice much quicker throttle response and spool. There are a lot of factors.
Yeh the injector port is integrated with this where on the 996 the intake is connected to the heads with that silly rubber piece via manifold injection port. So it's intake to rubber pieces to injector port housing which finally itself bolts to the actual head. I wonder if this piece would fit if we got rid of 996 set up. Would be nice. I would do custom intake that runs front to back and runners emerge from a central air chamber. **** on the T plenum!! It's a bad design!!
Here's a picture of the new (GT2 I think) inlet manifolds
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
Here's a picture of the new (GT2 I think) inlet manifolds
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
Does anybody know their flow rates - as this is what the rest of the system should be matched to

AND - If you haven't seen the video, have a look at this link to the Porsche website
Just click the play button in the video window
http://www.porsche.com/microsite/tec...lectedVariant=
.
Yeh the injector port is integrated with this where on the 996 the intake is connected to the heads with that silly rubber piece via manifold injection port. So it's intake to rubber pieces to injector port housing which finally itself bolts to the actual head. I wonder if this piece would fit if we got rid of 996 set up. Would be nice. I would do custom intake that runs front to back and runners emerge from a central air chamber. **** on the T plenum!! It's a bad design!!
The oil cooler is in the way somewhat. but the 997.1tt intakes are so much better and work with the 996 ports. they are made of plastic so no heat soak and also have the injector bosses on them, they bolt right on down to the heads with O-rings. The plenum is a larger ID too. The 997 GT-2 runs big boost stock. The stock 996 intake halves have a lower port that on the 993tt is connected, just throwing that out there
Nice to know!! No reason for custom intake then. Porsche knew the T plenum sucks . Glad they fixed it.
The oil cooler is in the way somewhat. but the 997.1tt intakes are so much better and work with the 996 ports. they are made of plastic so no heat soak and also have the injector bosses on them, they bolt right on down to the heads with O-rings. The plenum is a larger ID too. The 997 GT-2 runs big boost stock. The stock 996 intake halves have a lower port that on the 993tt is connected, just throwing that out there
Yeh the injector port is integrated with this where on the 996 the intake is connected to the heads with that silly rubber piece via manifold injection port. So it's intake to rubber pieces to injector port housing which finally itself bolts to the actual head. I wonder if this piece would fit if we got rid of 996 set up. Would be nice. I would do custom intake that runs front to back and runners emerge from a central air chamber. **** on the T plenum!! It's a bad design!!
The oil cooler is in the way somewhat. but the 997.1tt intakes are so much better and work with the 996 ports. they are made of plastic so no heat soak and also have the injector bosses on them, they bolt right on down to the heads with O-rings. The plenum is a larger ID too. The 997 GT-2 runs big boost stock. The stock 996 intake halves have a lower port that on the 993tt is connected, just throwing that out there

I am using an IPD plenum with the 997 75mm TB with my billet Alpha3076 setup. To be honest I do not know if there were any gains from it since it went on same time as the Alpha kit. Some older dynos had dips in them at the end, I do not see that in mine. When I was getting it some told me not to bother - but they were on closeout at one of the vendors at price I couldnt say no to.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...num-996tt.html
that thread made them seem legit - but i realize anything could be manipulated. i hope you do some independent back to back dynos of the plenum...
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...num-996tt.html
that thread made them seem legit - but i realize anything could be manipulated. i hope you do some independent back to back dynos of the plenum...
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
I am going this winter for 3076s and full supporting mods but TB&Plenum and also headers, going to use stock TB and ported headers.
My setup will be like : 3076, 4.5 IC, 2nd fuel pump & injectors, Y pipe, EBC, aso.
I will use the money saved on those for upgraded axles, hope I am right on my option.
My setup will be like : 3076, 4.5 IC, 2nd fuel pump & injectors, Y pipe, EBC, aso.
I will use the money saved on those for upgraded axles, hope I am right on my option.
Maths.........
Using pi r2 we can calculate that a TB with a diameter of 68mm has a cross sectional area of 3,631
(3.1415 x 34 x 34 = 3,631)
Now then, since we have one TB but two 'legs' on the Y-pipe, each legs should have a cross sectional area equal to half that of the TB
So, the y-pipe should have legs with a cross sectional area of 1,815.5
(3,631/2 = 1,815.5)
If we know the cross sectional area of the y-pipe's legs we can now calculate it's diameter
(diameter = 2 x (square root of cross sectional area / pi))
(diameter = 2 x (square root of 1,815.5 / 3.1415))
(diameter = 2 x (square root of 577.91)
(diameter = 2 x 24.04)
(diameter = 48.08mm)
Assuming there are 25.4mm in an inch
A Y-pipe leg with a diameter of 48.08mm is equal to 1.89"
So, a 68mm TB needs a y-pipe leg of 48mm
The trunk of the y-pipe would obviously be 68mm too in order to match the TB
So, if we start ****ing about with the TB, we should also look at the Y-pipe and the boost hoses, and the intercoolers, and the inlet piping etc.....
In actual fact, we shouldn't even be matching things to the TB anyway
It should be matched to the cylinder heads
So, has anybody got any info regarding the volume of the cylinder heads??????????
Using pi r2 we can calculate that a TB with a diameter of 68mm has a cross sectional area of 3,631
(3.1415 x 34 x 34 = 3,631)
Now then, since we have one TB but two 'legs' on the Y-pipe, each legs should have a cross sectional area equal to half that of the TB
So, the y-pipe should have legs with a cross sectional area of 1,815.5
(3,631/2 = 1,815.5)
If we know the cross sectional area of the y-pipe's legs we can now calculate it's diameter
(diameter = 2 x (square root of cross sectional area / pi))
(diameter = 2 x (square root of 1,815.5 / 3.1415))
(diameter = 2 x (square root of 577.91)
(diameter = 2 x 24.04)
(diameter = 48.08mm)
Assuming there are 25.4mm in an inch
A Y-pipe leg with a diameter of 48.08mm is equal to 1.89"
So, a 68mm TB needs a y-pipe leg of 48mm
The trunk of the y-pipe would obviously be 68mm too in order to match the TB
So, if we start ****ing about with the TB, we should also look at the Y-pipe and the boost hoses, and the intercoolers, and the inlet piping etc.....
In actual fact, we shouldn't even be matching things to the TB anyway
It should be matched to the cylinder heads
So, has anybody got any info regarding the volume of the cylinder heads??????????
So,maybe a 74 mm TB might help with a stock Y-pipe after all??...Turbo Mike told me also that the stock Y-pipe is fine and I would be wasting my money,,,atleast at my level??...Just some more thoughts here to confuse us.....lol...
I like the box that says ***





