Updated inlet or y pipe system - Page 2 - 6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

Feb 17, 2013 | 10:49 PM

#16

johnspeed

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,636

From: chicago

Rep Power: 256

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSMugen

Have you seen a car w/ the inlet pipes on them? You can clearly see the plenum when you look next to the fuel filter ... If you are concerned with the dealership seeing the pipes you might want to go with the pipes that attach to the stock restrictive plenum.

Short intake pipes would be seen easily by the dealer.
My car was tuned by Todd at Protomotive and makes very good power and better throttle response with the 'Restrictive' plenum over any fender well intake system near my HP level I have been in..

..It all depends at the mod/HP level that you are at to fully use that system..
I have over 40,000 miles on my original MAF and go to 7400 RPM..

To each his own, its all good..

Feb 18, 2013 | 12:09 AM

#17

GT996

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 429

From: Germany

Rep Power: 61

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by John@SpeedTech

Here is my reason why:

I tried them and from my direct experience, the alternate MAF's change the driving characteristics/behavior of the fuel delivery and smoothness of the car.

probably the confusion here is that a MAFless tune has no MAF that could behave differently. There is no MAF at all. Your experience might be that from a blow thru system?

Regards,
Andreas

Feb 18, 2013 | 12:15 AM

#18

johnspeed

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,636

From: chicago

Rep Power: 256

Quote:

Originally Posted by SSMugen

Sorry,I thought you were talking about a blow through set-up..

Feb 18, 2013 | 12:37 AM

#19

John@SpeedTech

Basic Sponsor

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,332

From: NorthEast US

Rep Power: 240

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT996

Hi,

probably the confusion here is that a MAFless tune has no MAF that could behave differently. There is no MAF at all. Your experience might be that from a blow thru system?

Regards,
Andreas

Yes. Also what I thought was being commented on...

__________________
991.2 GT3 RS Weissach Racing Yellow
991.2 Turbo S GT Silver
991.2 GT3 Chalk (Manual)
2022 Cayenne White
former 1972 911T white, 1984 911 3.2 Targa black, 993 cab white, 993TT arena red, 993TT silver, 996TT speed yellow, 991.1 GT3 white
www.speedtechexhausts.com
info@speedtechexhausts.com
Testimonials facebook SpeedTech Exhaust Videos

Feb 18, 2013 | 12:05 PM

#20

earl3

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 823

From: Mojave, CA

Rep Power: 133

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobbyfali

How is that possible to run 147mph on any type of 18g's or new billets!!!! That over 900bhp, the 18g's can't flow that, unless the car is making 750bhp and weighs under 2500lbs.

Is there a thread I can read up on this persons car. If he is running that MPH out of those turbos, there is a lot I can learn off his build!

Please forward me more info on his car!

Thanks

Bobby Ali

ba

Here ya go Bobby:

https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...-146-65-a.html

E85 car with lots of boost and eventually bent rods. All with that horrible bottleneck y-pipe in place

Feb 18, 2013 | 01:20 PM

#21

johnspeed

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,636

From: chicago

Rep Power: 256

Quote:

Originally Posted by earl3

Here ya go Bobby:

https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...-146-65-a.html

E85 car with lots of boost and eventually bent rods. All with that horrible bottleneck y-pipe in place

And stock plenum and stock throttle body..

Feb 18, 2013 | 02:42 PM

#22

markski@markskituning

Basic Sponsor

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 9,730

From: CHICAGO

Rep Power: 604

I think Chris did a back to back and the inlet pies made 30 whp... if Im not mistaken he made a post about it... but again , each set u is different... I know that Todd at proto did a back to back on 18gs and it made 35 whp more at 1.35 bar...
I had a set of them in 2002 form FVD... I honestly think that its the most overlooked upgrade to date... but thats just me...

__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

Feb 18, 2013 | 10:30 PM

#23

Ms4cd

Registered User

Joined: May 2010

Posts: 432

From: San Francisco

Rep Power: 64

Quote:

Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning

I agree, confirmed similar gains when I installed mine.

Feb 19, 2013 | 08:00 AM

#24

johnspeed

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,636

From: chicago

Rep Power: 256

On my set-up it did show hardly any improvement But I had a 200 cell Cargraphic exhaust on it then which I found out later to be restrictive for my 18gs pump gas set up.
It's all in the combo of mods, results may very.

Aug 12, 2016 | 06:00 AM

#25

samugtmadrid

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2016

Posts: 39

From: madrid

Rep Power: 0

samugtmadrid is infamous around these parts

Quote:

Originally Posted by GT996

Hi,

probably the confusion here is that a MAFless tune has no MAF that could behave differently. There is no MAF at all. Your experience might be that from a blow thru system?

Regards,
Andreas

I read the post and can not find the solution to my problem :-( I read that I can put a maf ford and all sorted but not that model ford is, and that goes well with maf ford? is designed to provide more air ?

Aug 12, 2016 | 06:13 AM

#26

BauerR

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 602

From: Baltimore

Rep Power: 116

You couldn't pay be to go back to a MAF setup. With ditching the OEM intake tract completely, my car woke up like no other mod Ive done to date.
The way my car runs, I would go out on a limb and say I have the fastest stock turbo 996 out there today.
Mind you, I have no real data on that(1/4 mile runs or dyno) but I'm happy for anyone to attempt to prove me otherwise.