996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Re-map stock 996 Turbo to 1.2 bars!!! Downside dependability concerns

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 01:38 PM
  #1  
kennyPride's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 104
From: kalifornia
Rep Power: 22
kennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the rough
Re-map stock 996 Turbo to 1.2 bars!!! Downside dependability concerns

OK a buddy of mind just got a local re-map/flash to his stock '01 TT. Night
and Day compared to my stock TT.
Now I want it, but I heard a re-map to 1.2 bars with stock turbos, gates, (Tip) driveline and hoses is a recipe for future dependability problems.
Forum thoughts on pushing our stock components to 1.2 bars (cheap re-map for less than 1K). thank you
 
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #2  
Th_Dude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 148
From: Ojai, CA
Rep Power: 49
Th_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond reputeTh_Dude has a reputation beyond repute
Me? I would avoid an unknown flash like the plague.
Get a reliable flash...also for less than $1000.
Even better, get a datalogger with your flash and know exactly where you stand. There are many reputable tuners to choose from. I personally recommend Kevin at UMW.
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...-975-00-a.html

YMMV
 
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 02:07 PM
  #3  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Looking for trouble. That's a lot of boost for stock turbos. You are likely out of injector too. As has been said, don't buy a fly by night tune. Stick to the Known tuners. I use EPL.
 
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
I ran 1.2 bars on my first GIAC flash with no problems but it was an X-50 with K24s..
 
Old Jun 23, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
LiNks's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,657
From: Long Island, New York
Rep Power: 115
LiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond reputeLiNks has a reputation beyond repute
1.2 on K24s when I started with the car also
 
Old Jun 24, 2013 | 06:44 AM
  #6  
King James's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 613
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 67
King James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond reputeKing James has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Th_Dude
Me? I would avoid an unknown flash like the plague.
Get a reliable flash...also for less than $1000.
Even better, get a datalogger with your flash and know exactly where you stand. There are many reputable tuners to choose from. I personally recommend Kevin at UMW.
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...-975-00-a.html

YMMV
I'm with you on the reputable tuners, I would avoid a generic flash like the plague. A custom tailored tune from a reputable tuner done on a dyno is the way to go.

A simple flash and go is kind of like buying a suit at Walmart, it works but you can tell difference.
 
Old Jun 24, 2013 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
i believe the conventional wisdom on tt tunes is that a 1.0 bar flash is optimal for k16's and k24's ( x50 ) are optimized to 1.2. this of course pre-supposes the tune is from a company not experimenting with your car. for ref, my car has 16/24's and is tuned for 1.2 with spikes of 1.3.
 
Old Jun 24, 2013 | 07:26 PM
  #8  
Another P's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 347
From: Butt cold Minneapolis
Rep Power: 29
Another P has a spectacular aura aboutAnother P has a spectacular aura about
I have an EVOMSIT tune and tiptronic remap. I assume most would say they are a reputable firm, with extensive tuning experience, even if not your cup of tune so to speak.
Depending on weather conditions, I have seen 1.2 on rare occasion, with stock turbos. If not mistaken, atmospheric (temp, humidity, etc) are what "asks" or demands the appropriate boost. So while I don't see that boost often, I don't think I'm putting an undue strain on the car. Is this wrong?
 
Old Jun 24, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #9  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Another P
I have seen 1.2 on rare occasion, with stock turbos. If not mistaken, atmospheric (temp, humidity, etc) are what "asks" or demands the appropriate boost. So while I don't see that boost often, I don't think I'm putting an undue strain on the car. Is this wrong?
it's not *right* or *wrong* per se. what it isn't? is normal for a k16 flash. 9's and consistent 1.0 is. moisture and humidity will provide momentary dashboard thrills. which is how i catch glimpses of 1.3. but in terms of frequency, it's up there with flying pig/ufo sightings.

reliable safe tunes on a stock car should never boost beyond 1.0. tell me i'm wrong. overboosting might be symptomatic of something else going on, and i'm not saying there is... but again, 1.2 spikes are not *normal* for a k16 flashed 96t.

'cup of tune" just caught that. nice ha.
 

Last edited by '02996ttx50; Jun 24, 2013 at 09:07 PM.
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 05:58 PM
  #10  
kennyPride's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 104
From: kalifornia
Rep Power: 22
kennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the rough
Scary fast at 1.2 bars which was hit consistently. It was noticeably faster just off idle. The owner says he even gets better gas mileage. Uses 91 pump gas in Calif.
 
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
VGLNTE1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,512
From: Illinois
Rep Power: 132
VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !VGLNTE1 Is a GOD !
I thought 1.1 was just fine with stock components. I've had my car at 1.1 for 30k miles
 
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 10:05 PM
  #12  
602996TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 344
From: arizona
Rep Power: 45
602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future602996TT has a brilliant future
I have stock K16's with a Softronic 91octane 1.1 bar tune and I can hit 1.2 with the occasional 1.3(especially under 70 degrees) spikes even in AZ summer. IMO anytime you tune any vehicle components (ex. turbos) will wear out a little quicker. My car has been tuned for the last 20,000 miles.
 
Old Jun 27, 2013 | 12:55 AM
  #13  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by kennyPride
OK a buddy of mind just got a local re-map/flash to his stock '01 TT. Night
and Day compared to my stock TT.
Now I want it, but I heard a re-map to 1.2 bars with stock turbos, gates, (Tip) driveline and hoses is a recipe for future dependability problems.
Forum thoughts on pushing our stock components to 1.2 bars (cheap re-map for less than 1K). thank you
How about I send you a tune for a few days so you can appreciate the difference and then have you and your buddy switch..
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Jun 28, 2013 | 12:20 AM
  #14  
kennyPride's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 104
From: kalifornia
Rep Power: 22
kennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the roughkennyPride is a jewel in the rough
OK guys, give me some facts and figures on why its a risk. What could go wrong/bad. My buddy's been running this tune for 6 months and his TT is a rocket. A couple of hundred here or there is not the issue but the performance and dependability is. But I got to say if I published the cost for this tune ... I'm thinking a line of TTs would be in for a thrill of their life for the cost of a family of four to Disneyland and dinner.
 
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 06:19 AM
  #15  
32krazy!'s Avatar
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,551
From: tn
Rep Power: 628
32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !32krazy! Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by kennyPride
OK guys, give me some facts and figures on why its a risk. What could go wrong/bad. My buddy's been running this tune for 6 months and his TT is a rocket. A couple of hundred here or there is not the issue but the performance and dependability is. But I got to say if I published the cost for this tune ... I'm thinking a line of TTs would be in for a thrill of their life for the cost of a family of four to Disneyland and dinner.
has your buddy done any datalogging at all? does he know what the lamda is at 3500 to 7000 rpm? does he know what the timing is at open loop? most cars runs the best just before they blow!! if he is logging and the data shows the tune to be effective and safe run it. if not and your basing your results on tthe seat of the pants effect stay with a known tuner who will keep the car at a safe level for the fuel run
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:08 AM.