996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

IPD 74mm Plenum w 997TT TB ?? any downside?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 11:37 AM
  #16  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Intercoolers is a must.... TB and plenum can wait...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Aug 22, 2014 | 11:54 AM
  #17  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Intercoolers is a must.... TB and plenum can wait...
i am running a cargraphic 1.3 tune. 5barfpr/gt2ic's/evoms dv's/1.0wg actuators. will the larger plenum and 997t tb help add power with nothing additional added or re-tuned?

i have been told by those that work on them that is the next logical step and possibly also adding the 72lb injectors. but i'm not looking to go beyond the 500rwhp. i am told, that just adding the 74mm plenum will get me there as i am close that number now.

what might i be missing? and thanks for the input. i'm not trying to confuse anyone or myself. i am setup per above with the 16/24's and have been for some time. thx again for any advice.
 
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 12:17 PM
  #18  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
i am running a cargraphic 1.3 tune. 5barfpr/gt2ic's/evoms dv's/1.0wg actuators. will the larger plenum and 997t tb help add power with nothing additional added or re-tuned?

i have been told by those that work on them that is the next logical step and possibly also adding the 72lb injectors. but i'm not looking to go beyond the 500rwhp. i am told, that just adding the 74mm plenum will get me there as i am close that number now.

what might i be missing? and thanks for the input. i'm not trying to confuse anyone or myself. i am setup per above with the 16/24's and have been for some time. thx again for any advice.
I disagree... ben there done that... your gt2ICs are pushing 65 deg C temps and thats robbing you of HP... your not addressing the issue...
log 3rd and 4th full throttle... you will see... check the intake and outside temps...
address the weak point not something extra one does because he has money to spare.
Or, stop listening to us do what "others" tell you... in my opinion, your being misguided.
Do a full log of the car... show me that its running well first... rpm, engine load, ignition angle, actual afrs, and boost... then do another one with intake temps...
then we can talk... until then your wasting time and money...
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Aug 22, 2014 | 12:41 PM
  #19  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Or, stop listening to us do what "others" tell you... in my opinion, your being misguided.
until then your wasting time and money...
disagree with what? and who is us exactly? so what's the misguided advice? that the larger plenum will not add hp? and what "issue"? are you referring to?! maxing out the injectors? or you're saying already exceeding the ic's ability to dissipate heat? ok, glad i asked lol never mind but thanks. i ask about a plenum and you get twisted about it?! wtf.

but yeah, money is no issue lol i guess i'll just spend a grand and see what happens and i won't listen to turbo mike ever again sheesh.

thx again for the advice though.. i think lol
 
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 12:58 PM
  #20  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
disagree with what? and who is us exactly? so what's the misguided advice? that the larger plenum will not add hp? and what "issue"? are you referring to?! maxing out the injectors? or you're saying already exceeding the ic's ability to dissipate heat? ok, glad i asked lol never mind but thanks. i ask about a plenum and you get twisted about it?! wtf.

but yeah, money is no issue lol i guess i'll just spend a grand and see what happens and i won't listen to turbo mike ever again sheesh.

thx again for the advice though.. i think lol


Turbo mike is a good guy.
If I had $1000 I would spend more and get really good big ics.
Plenum will not make you go backwards but I doubt it will give you 30whp whereas good ics will. Log your car. Address the issue not expand it. I'm trying to give you an honest opinion.
If you can do both. That simple.
 
Old Aug 22, 2014 | 01:29 PM
  #21  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by MARKSKI@911tuning
Turbo mike is a good guy.
If I had $1000 I would spend more and get really good big ics.
Plenum will not make you go backwards but I doubt it will give you 30whp whereas good ics will. Log your car. Address the issue not expand it. I'm trying to give you an honest opinion.
If you can do both. That simple.
That's all I was asking. If there was a downside or backwards. Nothing really more than that.
Thanks for the honest advice!
 
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 12:36 AM
  #22  
TabooPc's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 569
From: Seattle, WA
Rep Power: 82
TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !TabooPc Is a GOD !
As others have said, the turbo inlet piping is a big hp mod as far as bolt-ons go...

I was a believer in bolt-on power before upgrading my turbos. Now its a lot of work and tuning just to squeeze out another 20whp.. Without more fuel, and more turbo/tune you'll have a hard time gaining 35whp.

My car dyno'd 577whp, and when I did custom turbo intakes and ran a touch more boost, I then made 610whp. Thats it. These are custom fender intakes, 2.5" piping, huge cone filter... no restriction.

People say that you can gain 40whp from switching to fender intakes... Theres no way unless the current piping is a huge restriction.

HOWEVER.. You would probably gain 15-20whp doing the fender intakes or inlet piping... I reccommend FVD's or 911tuning.com's soft inlet pipes.

PS: You could always throw a methanol system on ($1200 installed) and retune... Then you could pick up 40whp instead of your 35 goal.
 
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #23  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TabooPc
As others have said, the turbo inlet piping is a big hp mod as far as bolt-ons go...

I was a believer in bolt-on power before upgrading my turbos. Now its a lot of work and tuning just to squeeze out another 20whp.. Without more fuel, and more turbo/tune you'll have a hard time gaining 35whp.

My car dyno'd 577whp, and when I did custom turbo intakes and ran a touch more boost, I then made 610whp. Thats it. These are custom fender intakes, 2.5" piping, huge cone filter... no restriction.

People say that you can gain 40whp from switching to fender intakes... Theres no way unless the current piping is a huge restriction.

HOWEVER.. You would probably gain 15-20whp doing the fender intakes or inlet piping... I reccommend FVD's or 911tuning.com's soft inlet pipes.

PS: You could always throw a methanol system on ($1200 installed) and retune... Then you could pick up 40whp instead of your 35 goal.
thanks for that. the mention of the added 35 hp was optimistic and that number is from all the papers on the plenums. not necessarily real world and i ( now ) realize that.

my issue here ( one anyway ) is that i can't get into anything that will raise red flags when it's time for emmisions testing since i live in a socialist state and they want to look up my rear every chance they get. but i will look into whether or not i can do the stuff you mention while keeping the car "looking" stock. "they" would never look at my tb or plenum, though smogging here is beginning to feel like a proctological exam, so you understand my concern(s). they would flag me for red inlet piping, of that i am sure. i'm not going anywhere near a meth kit or anything that pushes the car over 600hp. car has 118K miles and i feel i'm good with 30/50hp more if i can find it? but not much more without adding undue stress to the motor that'll ( maybe ) end up costing me down the road.

my goal was just to squeeze out a *bit* more hp/tq with the setup i've got and i figured if that could be achieved with the plenum and a cpl hours or messing with it, then i was all about it. but i'm doing my diligence here, and greatly appreciate the input.

this was the kind of info i had hoped for when i posted. thx again.
 
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 08:42 AM
  #24  
mtlsp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 465
From: north est
Rep Power: 61
mtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond reputemtlsp has a reputation beyond repute
in your case Meth would be perfect adding 15-30 hp and extra safety to your setup in case you run bad fuel!then later if you decide to build your engine or push more you current setup you can easily add 60hp++ with it
remember Meth cool your iat,suppress knock,raise octane and add fuel
one of the best bang for your $$$ out there


Originally Posted by '02996ttx50
thanks for that. the mention of the added 35 hp was optimistic and that number is from all the papers on the plenums. not necessarily real world and i ( now ) realize that.

my issue here ( one anyway ) is that i can't get into anything that will raise red flags when it's time for emmisions testing since i live in a socialist state and they want to look up my rear every chance they get. but i will look into whether or not i can do the stuff you mention while keeping the car "looking" stock. "they" would never look at my tb or plenum, though smogging here is beginning to feel like a proctological exam, so you understand my concern(s). they would flag me for red inlet piping, of that i am sure. i'm not going anywhere near a meth kit or anything that pushes the car over 600hp. car has 118K miles and i feel i'm good with 30/50hp more if i can find it? but not much more without adding undue stress to the motor that'll ( maybe ) end up costing me down the road.

my goal was just to squeeze out a *bit* more hp/tq with the setup i've got and i figured if that could be achieved with the plenum and a cpl hours or messing with it, then i was all about it. but i'm doing my diligence here, and greatly appreciate the input.

this was the kind of info i had hoped for when i posted. thx again.
 
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 09:02 AM
  #25  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
doesn't that require all that piping etc going to the frunk with the canister? or am i completely mistaken and confusing that with motons!? lol
 
Old Aug 24, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #26  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by rxbike
As I said before you are probably at your max injector duty cycle. You are trying to provide more air but without fuel,
... i'm getting the picture. thanks guys.
 
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 07:39 PM
  #27  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
HI,,Turbo Mike is a great guy..
I hate to say it but I have did some dynoing with a plenum and a also 74 TB at my 18g level ,,which I have posted in the past, And all I can say is I would say is I didn't see that big gain ....
 
Old Aug 25, 2014 | 07:51 PM
  #28  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
would you do it again? knowing where I'm at?
 
Old Aug 26, 2014 | 02:35 AM
  #29  
Fadi's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 990
From: Bucharest, Romania
Rep Power: 0
Fadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond reputeFadi has a reputation beyond repute
I would do TB when over 700hp, at least... i did over 800hp on stock TB and the power/torque curves were healthy.. I admit at those power levels TB will give bigger gains not only in power, but also in spool... for your setup do ICs or meth, or both... your engine will be happy... we see a lot of timing retard even on stock maps, ICs or meth will improve those losses a lot.. meth will be better but ICs are more reliable.. you choose.. i have 4.5ICs and the best meth kit i have found on the market. You need to install the meth lines under the car, yes... If you will stop bellow 700hp do gt2rs ICs otherwise at least 3.5"
TB doesnt require retune; neither ICs or meth unless you want to squeeze every drop of power and do a meth tune

Recently I added IPD 82mm competition plenum
 
Old Aug 26, 2014 | 06:20 AM
  #30  
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 7,984
From: la
Rep Power: 608
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
thanks fadi and johnspeed. leaning heavily toward the tb/plenum w injectors. my old tired gt2 ic's though small should hold up. i'm a quick blaster, not a sustained speed kind of guy anyway.

so as long as i don't end up going backwards or maxing out stuff to the degree it doesnt work? and even if quicker spool or even a bit more tq down low is all i gain? then thats cool. its just a hobby anyway. but again, i'm certain i am staying away from a meth kit. don't even like the sound of it lol

thx again.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM.