996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

My 996TT

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
RennTechV12's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,753
From: North Scottsdale, AZ
Rep Power: 114
RennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond reputeRennTechV12 has a reputation beyond repute
My 996TT

Thanks for the welcome, for some reason, the forum isn't letting me edit or post in my 1st thread.

Don't know if you guys are into drag racing or not (I love any kind of racing), but I took the 996 to the track a couple of weeks ago and ran pretty well. Here's my slip:


My 996 is an '02 stage 4. It has K24 turbochargers, GT2 intercoolers, Evoms airbox, Evoms race fuel GIAC programmer, full TechArt body kit, full TechArt race suspension, Brembo 16" race brakes, 19" HRE wheels, TechArt race clutch and some other extras.
 
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 11:22 PM
  #2  
RT7's Avatar
RT7
Show-N-Go like J-Lo Mofo
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,238
From: Riverside
Rep Power: 70
RT7 is infamous around these parts
Sharky and Craig can chime you on this.
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 05:40 AM
  #3  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
heres mine:
at the time it was on FVD stage 4 ECU and FVD race k-24s, stage 2 clutch, exhaust, dvs, gt2 intercoolers, 19's tires( ouch).
AND ITS A 6 SPEED( the reason i say this is cause it seems like guys with TIPS have better 60 foot and thus better TIMES.)
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL





Last edited by markski@markskituning; Dec 2, 2005 at 06:00 AM.
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 06:02 AM
  #4  
Mowateriology's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,092
From: Kuwait
Rep Power: 67
Mowateriology is infamous around these partsMowateriology is infamous around these parts
what do you guys reckon your cars would do (would have done) if they weren't on 19s?
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #5  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by Mowateriology
what do you guys reckon your cars would do (would have done) if they weren't on 19s?
i tried 18s MPSC tires... no difference(very surprised).
Problem with the TTis that the launch is a *****... u either bug it down or over rev it... if ur not in the perfect rpm range. Most drag cars rev up to 6000 rpm and dump the clutch- try to do that on a tt. NOT.
so the cars can be faster only if we would not have PSM to fight with, the wheel hop, and the ****ty short first gear which is useless. just my opinion.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #6  
AWD's Avatar
AWD
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,423
From: So. Cal.
Rep Power: 92
AWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud ofAWD has much to be proud of
Nice timeslips guys!

MARKSKI,
In your sig, it says you have a 2003 Evo. 8 with 648 rwhp. Your Evo is rear wheel drive?
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #7  
variable's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 358
From: Los Angeles, Stockholm
Rep Power: 37
variable is infamous around these parts
Seems like these 1/4 mile runs are all over the place. Stage 4 is 600 hp right? Isn't the MPH pretty low at 123mph for 600hp? I remember sharky getting close to that with just a chip? Years ago now.

Just curious really...
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #8  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by variable
[. Stage 4 is 600 hp right? Isn't the MPH pretty low at 123mph for 600hp? I remember sharky getting close to that with just a chip? Years ago now.

Just curious really... [/B]
Sharky did 117 mph if im not mistaken on chip and exhaust.. BUT HE ALSO HAS A TIPTRONIC- that is a whole different story. PLUS, I DONT KNOW OF ANYONE ELSE THAT GOT EVEN CLOSE TO SHARKYS RUN(11.7)...
knowing him- he probably had something extra(boost controller, intercooler spray)... not sure.
our times r right on the money- in my opinion.
what I dont get is how the gt700,750,800,and 900 hp TTs dont get anything better then 11.1sec. NOW THATS A MYSTERY.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL





Last edited by markski@markskituning; Dec 2, 2005 at 02:40 PM.
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 02:45 PM
  #9  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by AWD
Nice timeslips guys!

MARKSKI,
In your sig, it says you have a 2003 Evo. 8 with 648 rwhp. Your Evo is rear wheel drive?
no its four wheel drive... at the dyno we disconnect the driveshaft. that was at 30 psi. i can crank the boost up to 35psi now. I wish my TT was as fast(streight line) as my evo 8. I rev up to 10000 rpm.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL




Old Dec 2, 2005 | 03:27 PM
  #10  
variable's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 358
From: Los Angeles, Stockholm
Rep Power: 37
variable is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by MARKSKI
Sharky did 117 mph if im not mistaken on chip and exhaust.. BUT HE ALSO HAS A TIPTRONIC- that is a whole different story. PLUS, I DONT KNOW OF ANYONE ELSE THAT GOT EVEN CLOSE TO SHARKYS RUN(11.7)...
knowing him- he probably had something extra(boost controller, intercooler spray)... not sure.
our times r right on the money- in my opinion.
what I dont get is how the gt700,750,800,and 900 hp TTs dont get anything better then 11.1sec. NOW THATS A MYSTERY.
No I'm pretty sure it was 11.6 at 123 mph... with just a chip. Yes it was a tip, but hey.

I'm not a dragracer at all, never been to a 1/4 mile strip, so I don't know much about it. I have taken a ride in a 600 hp turbo though, and it feel much, much stronger than stock. I'm just surprised that it only adds about 10 mph in the quarter...

Just confused is all...
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #11  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by variable
No I'm pretty sure it was 11.6 at 123 mph... with just a chip. Yes it was a tip, but hey.

Just confused is all...
here is some more confusion: sharky ran 10.97 @125 mph. hmmmmmmmm
link: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...arky+1%2F4+run


I recall he ran 11.7 but the mph was less( I dont believe that a simple chip would yield a k-24s hp #s, unless he had something extra. mph denotes HP, and k-16s do not put out that. Knowing sharky, he had to have a trick up his sleeve, he always does. one can run 11.7 with less mph...
u have 2 independent cars running almost identical with almost the same set up....
and its was a TIP- big advantage in my opinion.
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL





Last edited by markski@markskituning; Dec 2, 2005 at 03:52 PM.
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #12  
variable's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 358
From: Los Angeles, Stockholm
Rep Power: 37
variable is infamous around these parts
Originally posted by MARKSKI
here is some more confusion: sharky ran 10.97 @125 mph. hmmmmmmmm
link: https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...arky+1%2F4+run


I recall he ran 11.7 but the mph was less( I dont believe that a simple chip would yield a k-24s hp #s, unless he had something extra. mph denotes HP, and k-16s do not put out that. Knowing sharky, he had to have a trick up his sleeve, he always does. one can run 11.7 with less mph...
u have 2 independent cars running almost identical with almost the same set up....
and its was a TIP- big advantage in my opinion.

You are right, I'm still confused...
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #13  
iLLM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,296
From: SOFLA/NYC
Rep Power: 717
iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !iLLM3 Is a GOD !
Originally posted by MARKSKI
no its four wheel drive... at the dyno we disconnect the driveshaft. that was at 30 psi. i can crank the boost up to 35psi now. I wish my TT was as fast(streight line) as my evo 8. I rev up to 10000 rpm.
Holy god that's insanity, ive been ins ome fast Evo's and was at Mitsubishi yesterday wanting to maybe get a Evo 9 MR, the guy said and your getting rid of your M3, ar eyou nuts? They were saying im crazy and so on LOL, how much approx did you put in to be getting all of that power, or even a decent over 500hp amount j/w..

BTW i still don't understand myself how 800+ hp and tq 996tt's arent pulling low 10's or anywhere near it
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 07:39 PM
  #14  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
I need to get my car to the track.
 
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #15  
markski@markskituning's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
20 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,730
From: CHICAGO
Rep Power: 604
markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !markski@markskituning Is a GOD !
Originally posted by iLLM3
Holy god that's insanity, ive been ins ome fast Evo's and was at Mitsubishi yesterday wanting to maybe get a Evo 9 MR, the guy said and your getting rid of your M3, ar eyou nuts? They were saying im crazy and so on LOL, how much approx did you put in to be getting all of that power, or even a decent over 500hp amount j/w..
If ur going to modd an evo past 450 hp to the wheels... dont get 2004 models and above... especially the MR. they all have a different transfer case tahts doesnt hold up. they blow up all the time. My tuners's car runs 8.51sec at 151mph.. thats a 2 liter engine with a single turbo... and a 100 NOS. yes baby- 10000 RPMS.. thats what I got.
you need $15k for the full set up done the right way.
but can get buy with $10K without the engine job.
here a quick video.... too bad I didnt record the 10k rpms.http://djmarkski.com/backfiree.mp4
 
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66
seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile
click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL





Last edited by markski@markskituning; Dec 2, 2005 at 08:20 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.