Ice on Intercooler for Drag & Dyno?
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,880
From: In a Canyon - Really :)
Rep Power: 290
Ice on Intercooler for Drag & Dyno?
So I'm brainstorming......
Anything wrong with the idea of dumping a bunch of ice into the into the intercooler ducts for drag strip and dyno?
Seems like it's a ready made container AND the water drips behind the rear tires!
Jaycla: I'm going to LAPD tomorrow at 3:00P. They have an AWD dyno, but it's not safe for the turbo. RWD it is.
Anyone want to take dibs on what a GIAC (91 octane) Program, Remus exhaust, Evo intake X50 will run in RWD?
Anything wrong with the idea of dumping a bunch of ice into the into the intercooler ducts for drag strip and dyno?
Seems like it's a ready made container AND the water drips behind the rear tires!
Jaycla: I'm going to LAPD tomorrow at 3:00P. They have an AWD dyno, but it's not safe for the turbo. RWD it is.
Anyone want to take dibs on what a GIAC (91 octane) Program, Remus exhaust, Evo intake X50 will run in RWD?
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; May 5, 2006 at 08:28 PM.
Ist not a good idea to use crank numbers since we all use different % figures.... I use 12.5%.. RWD.... and 17% for AWD.... I seen others use 22 % and as low as 15% for AWD... so let make it clear and use
RW numbers... and PEAK HP numbers to be exact... casue we are all looking for a peak to make us feel better that out car is XXX HP LOL.
I say 470 rw HP ??? Im guessing.
RW numbers... and PEAK HP numbers to be exact... casue we are all looking for a peak to make us feel better that out car is XXX HP LOL.
I say 470 rw HP ??? Im guessing.
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 27
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
Ist not a good idea to use crank numbers since we all use different % figures.... I use 12.5%.. RWD.... and 17% for AWD.... I seen others use 22 % and as low as 15% for AWD... so let make it clear and use
RW numbers... and PEAK HP numbers to be exact... casue we are all looking for a peak to make us feel better that out car is XXX HP LOL.
I say 470 rw HP ??? Im guessing.
RW numbers... and PEAK HP numbers to be exact... casue we are all looking for a peak to make us feel better that out car is XXX HP LOL.
I say 470 rw HP ??? Im guessing.
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,880
From: In a Canyon - Really :)
Rep Power: 290
That sounds kinda low. Isn't this package supposed to be good for 560 crank HP? I guess 560 x .85 = 476
Any opinions on icing the intercoolers?
Not that it matters really....
I'll try and post the graph tomorrow!
Any opinions on icing the intercoolers?
Not that it matters really....
I'll try and post the graph tomorrow!
Last edited by Turbo Fanatic; May 6, 2006 at 12:32 AM.
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 27
I know a few that went to LAPD for dyno and got around the whp figures posted but they where 16/24 hybrids, as far as the ice if the fans are not pointed at the intercoolers then the ice might help but if they are pointed I think it would hurt power since the ice will block the fan air from going through the intercoolers.
Originally Posted by ari
That sounds kinda low. Isn't this package supposed to be good for 560 crank HP? I guess 560 x .85 = 476
Any opinions on icing the intercoolers?
Not that it matters really....
I'll try and post the graph tomorrow!
Any opinions on icing the intercoolers?
Not that it matters really....
I'll try and post the graph tomorrow!
Last edited by trev0006; May 6, 2006 at 12:41 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sdg1871
991 Turbo
267
Dec 24, 2015 12:22 PM
Josh/AWE
991 Turbo
31
Sep 28, 2015 03:55 PM
