Europipe Bazooka..... OMFG!
Originally Posted by cjv
I wonder where that came from? 

Originally Posted by willcoxmd
how about an audio clip? would love to hear it
Originally Posted by adybuncio
Must hear it!!!!!
Last edited by Zippy; Jul 19, 2006 at 10:48 PM.
Originally Posted by iLLM3
I would also like to hear it, congrats man! Question, if it isnt in their plans to produce it, why did they even make a prototype, or is it custom order?
Originally Posted by Zippy
Thanks. I believe they were considering bringing it on as a reguliar production model, but were too busy to fit it in.
Originally Posted by Craig
Congratulations Mike!!!
I do not understand how an exhaust system with cats and a chamber muffler can flow more air than straight pipes.
Craig
I do not understand how an exhaust system with cats and a chamber muffler can flow more air than straight pipes.
Craig
My primary objective with this exhaust was to have a system that would not be restrictive, based on the guidelines in A.G. Bells Book, "Forced induction Performance Tuning" for the HP targets I have in mind for my car. I believe the book lays out some fairly sound principals in exhaust design, in relation to HP generated.
In regards to exhaust tubing size, it says that engines between 3.5L & 4.0L developing 200 to 250 HP/L with a dual exhaust, piping s/b between 82mm & 95mm. For a 3.6L engine, this would indicate an exhaust that would be appropriate for 720hp-900hp range. As my Cat/Can pipe is 84mm, I believe this system to be able to easily handle a true 700+ HP without any problem with restriction.
I believe the stock exhaust, straight pipe, only has a 60mm primary tubing. This would be a restriction.
Originally Posted by deputydog95
that was the first thing i thought of when reading the numbers. manuf's love to play with their numbers 

Originally Posted by sharkster
very cool mike.. post some sound clips!
Originally Posted by Craig
Congratulations Mike!!!
I do not understand how an exhaust system with cats and a chamber muffler can flow more air than straight pipes.
Craig
I do not understand how an exhaust system with cats and a chamber muffler can flow more air than straight pipes.
Craig
My guess is they are comparing stock 60 mm open pipes versus the much larger diameter Europipe exhaust.
Furthermore, I can tell you from experience .................. If Steff @ Europepipe says it is so, then it is so. You can take it to the bank. There is no BS at Europipe.
The only question I would ask is are these numbers from Steff.
Originally Posted by Zippy
I know what you're saying Craig. But if you think about it, the narrow diameter of the stock tail-pipe, which Stef indicates is used in the "Open pipe - no cat - stock tailpipe: 422 cfm" measurement, is a definate restriction. My exhaust has dual tips out of the canister (70mm & 76mm), not to mention a fat 84mm pipe between the Cats & Cans.
My primary objective with this exhaust was to have a system that would not be restrictive, based on the guidelines in A.G. Bells Book, "Forced induction Performance Tuning" for the HP targets I have in mind for my car. I believe the book lays out some fairly sound principals in exhaust design, in relation to HP generated.
In regards to exhaust tubing size, it says that engines between 3.5L & 4.0L developing 200 to 250 HP/L with a dual exhaust, piping s/b between 82mm & 95mm. For a 3.6L engine, this would indicate an exhaust that would be appropriate for 720hp-900hp range. As my Cat/Can pipe is 84mm, I believe this system to be able to easily handle a true 700+ HP without any problem with restriction.
I believe the stock exhaust, straight pipe, only has a 60mm primary tubing. This would be a restriction.
My primary objective with this exhaust was to have a system that would not be restrictive, based on the guidelines in A.G. Bells Book, "Forced induction Performance Tuning" for the HP targets I have in mind for my car. I believe the book lays out some fairly sound principals in exhaust design, in relation to HP generated.
In regards to exhaust tubing size, it says that engines between 3.5L & 4.0L developing 200 to 250 HP/L with a dual exhaust, piping s/b between 82mm & 95mm. For a 3.6L engine, this would indicate an exhaust that would be appropriate for 720hp-900hp range. As my Cat/Can pipe is 84mm, I believe this system to be able to easily handle a true 700+ HP without any problem with restriction.
I believe the stock exhaust, straight pipe, only has a 60mm primary tubing. This would be a restriction.
Europipe’s “Bazooka” addresses the pipe diameter restriction admirably. However, it retains chamber mufflers. As you are undoubtedly aware, chamber mufflers attenuate sound by reflecting the exhaust stream back and forth against angled walls within the muffler body, thereby slowing down the exhaust flow considerably. Thus, chamber mufflers are very restrictive.
In contrast, an "open pipe - no cat - stock tailpipe” exhaust has no muffler whatsoever. There is no muffler less restrictive than no muffler.
Europipe’s “Bazooka” also uses 100 cell cats, which are far less restrictive than 400 cell OEM cats. However, an "open pipe - no cat - stock tailpipe” exhaust has no cats whatsoever. Once again, there is no cat less restrictive than no cat.
The only flow advantage that Europipe’s Bazooka has over an "open pipe - no cat - stock tailpipe” exhaust lies in the pipe diameter. While Europipe’s larger diameter piping undoubtedly flows considerably better than OEM 60 mm piping, it surprises me that this advantage overcomes the restrictive chamber muffler and 100 cell cats to such an extent that, according to the posted stats, the Europipe flows 40% better than an "open pipe - no cat - stock tailpipe.” I obviously have no empirical data to dispute the posted stats. Nevertheless, the results do not make sense to my novice mind.
Craig
Last edited by Craig; Jul 20, 2006 at 12:48 AM.
what craig said 
i'm not an expert either, but i don't see how larger diameter piping with cats and mufflers will outflow a wide open exhaust. especially with as short a run as the TT exhaust is. even 100 cell cats are very restrictive. never mind the chambered exhaust. even if you tripled the piping diameter, you'd still be bottle necking at the mufflers and cats.
unless of course they carried the oversized piping through the muffler chambers which would explain the dimensions of the mufflers.....this may overcome the flow lost through the muffler chambers. however, you'd still have air trying to crash through the cats.
it'd be interesting to see some before and after dyno runs on a few different cars.

i'm not an expert either, but i don't see how larger diameter piping with cats and mufflers will outflow a wide open exhaust. especially with as short a run as the TT exhaust is. even 100 cell cats are very restrictive. never mind the chambered exhaust. even if you tripled the piping diameter, you'd still be bottle necking at the mufflers and cats.
unless of course they carried the oversized piping through the muffler chambers which would explain the dimensions of the mufflers.....this may overcome the flow lost through the muffler chambers. however, you'd still have air trying to crash through the cats.
it'd be interesting to see some before and after dyno runs on a few different cars.
Last edited by deputydog95; Jul 20, 2006 at 01:59 AM.





