996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

m-40 / m-20 jammer!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #16  
atlshaver's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,156
From: Atlanta, GA
Rep Power: 68
atlshaver has a spectacular aura aboutatlshaver has a spectacular aura about
Great! I am not so patiently waiting...
 
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #17  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by KJM3
It took my installer 1.5 hours to install and he said it was easy. I didn't do it myself nor would I try.

The Blinder isn't so great, the recommendations of a few other people here were right on. Laser Park Pro or Laser Interceptor. I personally have the AntiLaser G8. ALL of them are better than the Blinder. And if you buy the Blinder anyway, you have been persuaded by advertising and NOT facts.

- KJ
And you are making this claim based on what, I happen to know quite a few people that have been more than pleased with the blinder, not to mention just about every test there is the blinder has been rated the top performer.
 
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #18  
KJM3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 445
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 40
KJM3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by heavychevy
And you are making this claim based on what, I happen to know quite a few people that have been more than pleased with the blinder, not to mention just about every test there is the blinder has been rated the top performer.
http://www.guysoflidar.com/

That's the best site for UNBIASED Radar Detector and Laser Countermeasure review.

For more information on Radar and Anti-Laser stuff in general:
http://www.radardetector.net/

- KJ

P.S. Ivan, I'm glad you've seen the light. Also, the Laser Park Pro's ability as a "parking sensor" is very primative, BUT it gives you an excuse as to why the laser diode is on the front of your car in case a cop gives you hassles.
 
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #19  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Still dont buy it, this is the only site i've seen where the blinder isnt head and shoulders above the rest, and for you to suggest foul play based on funding or general bias would have to call for some type of evidence. Not to mention it doesnt even look like it was tested completely.
 
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #20  
KJM3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 445
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 40
KJM3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Still dont buy it, this is the only site i've seen where the blinder isnt head and shoulders above the rest, and for you to suggest foul play based on funding or general bias would have to call for some type of evidence. Not to mention it doesnt even look like it was tested completely.
Sounds like somebody here works for Blinder. LOL

Not only does the http://www.guysoflidar.com website have a test done in March 2007 http://www.guysoflidar.com/march-200...mmer-test.html that shows that the Blinder is DEFINITELY NOT the best, it is trusted by enthusiasts who are into radar/laser stuff as a HOBBY.

If you don't trust this website, feel free to go to the http://www.radardetector.net/ forum and check out the comments of thousands of other radar/laser counter-measure owners.

But judging by your response, I can tell that you didn't even bother looking at the links I posted.

- KJ
 

Last edited by KJM3; Apr 29, 2007 at 05:02 PM.
Old Apr 29, 2007 | 07:25 PM
  #21  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by KJM3
Sounds like somebody here works for Blinder. LOL


- KJ
Acutally maybe you should check yoursef before making claims. I havent come in here trying to "convert the heathens"..... You came in here using one test to substantiate claims of bias on the tons of other places that rate the linder very high. This is the technology age, nothing stays on top very long, and there is always something better out there, if not, it's on the way, but your approach is more advertisiment than anything I have said.
 
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #22  
Duane996tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,870
From: San Diego, San Francisco
Rep Power: 116
Duane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond repute
Laser Jammers in Calif is more than likely "obstruction of justice".
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #23  
KJM3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 445
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 40
KJM3 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Acutally maybe you should check yoursef before making claims. I havent come in here trying to "convert the heathens"..... You came in here using one test to substantiate claims of bias on the tons of other places that rate the linder very high. This is the technology age, nothing stays on top very long, and there is always something better out there, if not, it's on the way, but your approach is more advertisiment than anything I have said.
OK, show me some factual evidence from "tonnes of other places".

- KJ
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #24  
Eric523's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 255
From: Newport Beach, CA
Rep Power: 31
Eric523 is infamous around these parts
So does anyone have a recommendation for California drivers?

I don't think I'll have a problem hiding it, but if their gun tells them its been jammed(by me) i'm pretty much done for right?
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #25  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #26  
manalex's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 230
From: Suwanee, GA
Rep Power: 29
manalex is infamous around these parts
FWIW, I researched this a few months ago and came to the conclusion that LPP is probably the way to go.

The Blinder seems to be older technology that at the time was being updated, not sure what the status is now. The Blinder is cheaper, but you need no less than 3 emitters in the front to adequately protect the car, i.e. an M30 if you will.

See my posts here https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ad.php?t=69028 and here http://www.radardetector.net/viewtop...509&highlight= for some of the information with respect to Blinder on the 996TT specifically. I believe the second link is sponsored by the Blinder (or someone affiliated with them) so if you need to ask specific questions it's a pretty good site.

The LPP is more expensive, more powerful and requires only one emitter in the front. Try this site for LPP questions http://www.laserproparkusa.com/forum/

Guys of Lidar seem to prefer the technology employed by the LPP and I believe they are independent.

In the end I opted not to buy any of them-simply didn't like how the units integrated in the cockpit of the car and decided to take my chances.
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #27  
KJM3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 445
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 40
KJM3 is infamous around these parts
http://www.1-radar-laser-jammers-det...rt/faqs/08.php
This is a link to an online stores FAQ that talks about Laser Jammers in General and mentions the Blinder (because they sell it). Not a review whatsoever.

http://www.laserveil.com/laser/jamme...rs-guide/2006/
This review is old and the laser jammers they compared Blinder with don't include the Laser Park Pro, AntiLaser G8 or Laser Interceptor (all newer units that have been released recently)

http://www.radartest.com/article.asp?articleID=8502
This test ALSO does not include any of the newer and better units aforementioned.

http://www.laserjammertechnology.com...mers/index.php
http://www.radar-detector-superstore...linderm20.html
These are just store links that sell radar and laser units and quote excerpts from reviews to sell their units. LOL

http://www.blinderxtreme.com/access/...fied_test.html
And FINALLY you list a link to Blinder's OWN website where they have excerpts to reviews (the NEWEST of which was done in 2005).
That is TRULY the most biased source you could've found!

Honestly, when I saw all the links I was suprised, but after looking at them, I'm even more amused than I was before.

If you think Blinder is the best, you can buy it, but my money was spent elsewhere after I conducted some REAL research.

Cheers,
KJ
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #28  
Duane996tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,870
From: San Diego, San Francisco
Rep Power: 116
Duane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond reputeDuane996tt has a reputation beyond repute
I know a few guys with jammers in Cali. None of them have ever been caught with it. I don't think the 'it's a parking detector' excuse is going to work if you actually get stopped and they check.
 
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #29  
95RogueM3's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 715
From: Richmond, VA
Rep Power: 62
95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of95RogueM3 has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by angldrkns9
GOOD NEWS! i emailed laser interceptor on purchasing a unit and they replied:

Dear Jason,

Our USA office is about to be opened.
Can i Forward your email to them?


Ivan


YESSSSSS!!
Its been exactly a month, any word on availability? (the website says it still isnt out, but perhaps they dont often update the website..)

It seems as if LidaTek LE-30 units are no longer available. That leaves me with a choice between the more expensive Laser Park Pro for $600 or the Laser Interceptor for an undisclosed amount. (I would bet about the same $600)

It seems to me when you are buying something like this (detector or jammer) you might as well go with the best available as none are guaranteed to work 100% of the time, might as well go with the one most likely to work when needed most. Am I wrong to dismiss the Blinder altogether? (they scored mid-80% in the above GOL testing)

Thanks.
 

Last edited by 95RogueM3; May 28, 2007 at 10:42 PM.
Old May 28, 2007 | 11:26 PM
  #30  
KJM3's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 445
From: Toronto
Rep Power: 40
KJM3 is infamous around these parts
When I bought my Anti-Laser G8, it was considered the "Best" at the time. If I were to buy a Laser Blocker now, I would definitely buy the Laser Interceptor. Like you said, none are guaranteed to work 100% of the time, so it'd be best to buy the best (at the time).

That being said, my Anti-Laser G8 blocked laser FOUR times in one week a few weeks ago and I couldn't be happier.

When the time comes to sell my TT, I'm going to send my Anti-Laser G8 in for a firmware upgrade and hopefully that'll close the gap a bit to the newer products out there. Or if the gap is too big, I might install it onto my FX45 and buy whatever is best at that time to put on my next "Sports" car.

- KJ

Originally Posted by 95RogueM3
Its been exactly a month, any word on availability? (the website says it still isnt out, but perhaps they dont often update the website..)

It seems as if LidaTek LE-30 units are no longer available. That leaves me with a choice between the more expensive Laser Park Pro for $600 or the Laser Interceptor for an undisclosed amount. (I would bet about the same $600)

It seems to me when you are buying something like this (detector or jammer) you might as well go with the best available as none are guaranteed to work 100% of the time, might as well go with the one most likely to work when needed most. Am I wrong to dismiss the Blinder altogether? (they scored mid-80% in the above GOL testing)

Thanks.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 PM.