Fine tuned EVO/Imagine GT2 Tuning - Killer Angel, move to the right lane
SubscribeEvo/Imagine(Todd and STeven) came up again to fine tune the GT2. The problem they identified was a dip in HP/TQ in midrange due to afr, boost, and some other parameters, and a couple of mechanical tweaks.
The car is insane. Steady traction loss in 1 thru 3rd, and 4th chirp.
It just pulls like a Mother*****er
I have to say the service level is unparalelled.
BTW - this is at 1.3 spiked, and 1.2 mostly.
Dyno here:
I know , I know..... I am scheduling to get the rods done, and high flow injectors, although the AFR is pretty good for now.

The car is insane. Steady traction loss in 1 thru 3rd, and 4th chirp.
It just pulls like a Mother*****er
I have to say the service level is unparalelled.
BTW - this is at 1.3 spiked, and 1.2 mostly.
Dyno here:
I know , I know..... I am scheduling to get the rods done, and high flow injectors, although the AFR is pretty good for now.

Quote:
Originally posted by Hamann7
How is this faster than KA?
I don't agree with the engineering approach to the Stage 4GT in general, but to each his own.
I have heard nothing but great reviews of Protomotive. The California thing is just killing me. Reality is...including scheduling shipping, we're talking 2mo down time. Not possible at this time, as I love driving it often.Originally posted by Hamann7
How is this faster than KA?
I don't agree with the engineering approach to the Stage 4GT in general, but to each his own.
Garret was sending files back and fourth to get the right program for this GT2.
Shank,
Refresh my memory...just what have you done in mods to your motor. Nice TQ curve!!
Refresh my memory...just what have you done in mods to your motor. Nice TQ curve!!
Okay...I'm confused. How do you get a chassis dyno sheet that shows the flywheel HP and TQ?
Well, I am back in Kansas and honestly dead tired!! Spent the earlier part of the week in David's brothers garage and the later part on the dyno with Ryan's and David's car. David's car was done a Mustang and the GTII on the dynojet.
David, your car fishtails through 2nd and third. First gear is pretty useless, sorry
I look forward to hearing your impressions when you come back.
It was great to see you guys-Lou and Ryan. Next time we come up, call me when it is warmer would ya
It is still near 70 here. 45 is too cold!
David, your car fishtails through 2nd and third. First gear is pretty useless, sorry
I look forward to hearing your impressions when you come back. It was great to see you guys-Lou and Ryan. Next time we come up, call me when it is warmer would ya
It is still near 70 here. 45 is too cold!Quote:
Originally posted by Kevin
Jeff, the understood limit to the factory rod is 650 flywheel HP.. Rods are the same as the 993TT and they tend to pinch the rod bearings.. Why wait to have it happened when it has already... Borrowed Time..
Originally posted by Kevin
Jeff, the understood limit to the factory rod is 650 flywheel HP.. Rods are the same as the 993TT and they tend to pinch the rod bearings.. Why wait to have it happened when it has already... Borrowed Time..
Hi Kevin,
More power or more pressure per cycle is a compressive load on the rod. Meaning it will load up the beam. Not necessarily the cap and not the bolt.
RPM's put a really high load on the bolts and cap. This is why a boosted motor is actually less hard on rod than a 9000 rpm N/A motor.
Also has to do with torque (power per cycle). So if you a motor that makes 600 ft/lbs at 2000 rpm's it is a much higher load on the rod than the same torque at 4000 rpms.
Bye.



