997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Official APR Tuned 997TT FAQ Thread......

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #76  
Arone997tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 339
From: CT
Rep Power: 43
Arone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud of
robin/matt I live in trumbull i would be more willing to let you guys use my car for some runs
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 05:04 AM
  #77  
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 249
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by tclayj
You might have a point. My Ego had a hard time believing in APR because they associate with VW/Audi and not the likes of Ferrari and the other Italians. That being said, I stand by, our Greek friend Skand.. and his comments, and Matt at GMP. Having a APR tune, FVD exhaust and SACHS 2.5 clutch I look forward to more numbers from GMP to help me understand why I out perform similar P car tunes. I also regularly see 1.0 BAR on WOT and have on a very rare occasion seen the meter flash above this reading. I am in total agreement, personal first hand experience, with Skand in Greece on this matter.
tjclay its not a matter of standing by anyone, taking sides or getting overly caught up with ego's. That is not what this thread is about at all however your post indicates you have totally missed the point, or should i correctly say a number of points.

I didnt realise this was a war between those very few with this APR tune and the majority that have taken different tune directions. No non APR tune owner has yet specifically said the APR tune is rubbish. The APR tune is obviously a powerful tune particularly regarding the torque levels going by all accounts so far.

What is being questioned here is :

1) The very obvious discrepancy between APRs/GMP's boost claims of 20lbs max vs Skandalis's boost claim of 1 bar max.

2) APR claiming to be the best 997tt tuner in the business.

3) Whether APR's tune set up is suitable as a stage 1 tune given a heavier clutch is required to get the best of it.

4) Whether the tune is also suitable for providing durabiliy of other engine components such as stock turbo chargers over the longer term.

One thing that appears to have been totally overlooked here is that all other stage 1 tunes have been set up to provide sub 800nms torque levels yet provide much the same kw of @400. This is obviously to allow the purchaser of the tune use of their car without being immediately subjected to further expenses such as replacing the stock clutch etc.
Incidentally these "other tunes" also all provide further stages of development to those willing to replace these "other components" with the full knowledge that further expense is required to maintain reliability of their car to withstand the additional torques and Hp's generated along the way by the tunes higher HP/Torque setting.
It would appear with APR's tune the stock clutch evidently has no hope of coping with this additional torque so it is reasonable to say APR hasnt given sufficient consideration in the course of setting the tune up therefore, the tune is somewhat "questionable" particularly where APR have stated they are the best tuner with superior tuning techniques for the 997tt. One would have reasonably thought APR would have accomodated for the general durability of the car in stock trim in the course of setting up this tune or, at least provided a warning that the tune needs a stage 2 clutch to go with it, packaging it accordingly at a price.

From the above 4 questions I believe most have been now generally answered with exception of question 1 and once we have the facts on that i will give a summary of closure on how I see it.
Dyno reports and acceleration stats will also aid here in finalising.

Regardless of the outcome of my future summary I will always respect the opinions of others provided they are based on facts and not purely emotion and, will welcome any responses and comments and critisism .

Originally Posted by leousm
I think next time GMP goes to the dyno (or anyone with APr tune for that matter) they should have both AFR AND Boost logged and graphed. Despite APR's claims of variable boost for a given load, I think it will give everyone a better picture of how power levels are achieved. It can only help to answer one of the most persistent questions about this particular flash.
+1 leousm and, yes we are patiently waiting.

Originally Posted by skandalis447
Thank you for your comment...You see some people find it very hard to believe that a tune is better than another...Also,because someone wrote that my car might have other parts installed,have in mind that APR does not have a flash for anything but stock 997TT VTGs...We have 12 997TT with APR here in Greece...all tip cars...all dash gauges show 1bar...i took the time and efford to plug durametric,piwis and gauge to see and verify boost level...but there is no difference for me whether it is 1 or 1,2 or 1,3bar...I just wrote what i saw...and that was 1bar...As for different boost levels you have to read and understand APR engineering concept in this tune so to see why boost at my car is 1,0bar but can go higher with worse conditions...(hot weather,lower quality fuel...)
So now its 1, 1.2 or 1.3 bar Skandalis? Are you warming us up for something different?
If so... no worries . One way or the other Ill be just satisfied to finally have some facts to consider .
I stated many posts back now that the stock gauge will only ever show 1 bar regardless of how much boost you are generating. Sports C mode can show up to 1.2 only but that may well not apply to APR's tune settings so it may not register that on the cars gauge.
You said your durametric data log and mechanical gauge only ever showed 1 bar max. This didnt add up. But you now say "can go higher"? This is precisely why ive been asking for the durametric data log as APR and GMP have said the tune has 20lbs max boost. I have no problems if your data log now shows @20lbs. At least that will give those here that have questioneyour 1 bar claim a logical explanation to your APR tune's power, and your fast acceleration times.
 

Last edited by speed21; Jun 14, 2010 at 05:29 AM.
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 10:36 AM
  #78  
skandalis447's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,671
From: Athens
Rep Power: 135
skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !skandalis447 Is a GOD !
speed21...
you made me very happy that you wont have a problem if my logs are over 1bar... that was a relief for me...
its good to have another member here with APr tune that sees the same boost as me,and also is faster than other 997TT cars,as mine...Finally i dont expect you to understand the way APR flash operates,since you did not understand my PM regarding start up noise...I really do not know how many times should i write boost is 1bar to stop questioning yourself.I believe i should write it everyday...at least two times...
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #79  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by skandalis447
speed21...
you made me very happy that you wont have a problem if my logs are over 1bar... that was a relief for me...
its good to have another member here with APr tune that sees the same boost as me,and also is faster than other 997TT cars,as mine...Finally i dont expect you to understand the way APR flash operates,since you did not understand my PM regarding start up noise...I really do not know how many times should i write boost is 1bar to stop questioning yourself.I believe i should write it everyday...at least two times...
This is getting dizzying...hey Skand, who is the "other" member here that you are referring to, tclayj? He's got no proof.
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #80  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
I will have dyno results from another car and trap times this week for you guys.
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #81  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by Arone997tt
robin/matt I live in trumbull i would be more willing to let you guys use my car for some runs

ARone please give me a call when you get this 888 488 2028 EXT 257 or shoot me an email @ mkrisel@gmpperformance.com.


I would love to hook up with you while I'm up there.
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #82  
Chris Green@USP's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,064
From: Coral springs, FL
Rep Power: 0
Chris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond reputeChris Green@USP has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by speed21
Chris Im not saying they have or they havent as there simply isnt any feedback out there for any P owner to be able to make that determination at this stage in the game.

P owners may well be able to accept the APR product in a better light if it was associated to higher end market brands such as Lamborghini, Ferrari, and Bugatti however that is not the case. Instead APR's P tune is comming off the the back of lower end car brands such as Audi and VW.

Its a bit like Hyundai standing up on their soapbox and lording to the world how they have now mastered the tuning principles for the Ferrari brand and be now automatically qualified to be taken seriously as the grand masters of the tuning world for the Ferrari brand. Then there is the other aspect of putting a stupid high price on the tune in a bid to add some form of credibility. A hard slog as i believe APR is (and has) been having with the P fraternity with their P tune.

P owners are having a very hard time swallowing the story.

Then there is the Skandalis palava on boost which isnt helping APR at all.

Need i say more..
Well hopefully I can help bring more information and data from the APR software to the community and shed some light on the subject so more 997 owners will consider.

I understand that you, and others would like to be associated with a more prestigious line of vehicles.. but technically 2 of those makes you just listed are VW's. VW/Audi is among the best manufacturers in the world and not to mention the fact that Porsche is in the same family. So its not quite the same as the Hyundai analogy. And at the same token.. other tuners may make tunes for more high end cars.. but do they tune and race cars in the Grand-Am sports car series? I personally think that's a bit more impressive and convincing of their abilities then someone who has a tune for a few exotics.

Its probable that other dedicated Porsche tuners spend more time on Porsche in general making solid tunes.. But for this particular 997TT tune, APR personally owned a 997TT and I know they went full force on this one in time and resources. So for this particular model, that is a non-issue.

Don't take this the wrong way, the other tuners in the market are great as well. In fact, I have EPL on my 996. I just really wanted to stress the fact that APR is not some Mickey Mouse company, and their 997 tune was far from neglected in the development department.
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #83  
nyamg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,202
From: Long Island New York
Rep Power: 80
nyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud ofnyamg has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Chris Green@USP
Well hopefully I can help bring more information and data from the APR software to the community and shed some light on the subject so more 997 owners will consider.

I understand that you, and others would like to be associated with a more prestigious line of vehicles.. but technically 2 of those makes you just listed are VW's. VW/Audi is among the best manufacturers in the world and not to mention the fact that Porsche is in the same family. So its not quite the same as the Hyundai analogy. And at the same token.. other tuners may make tunes for more high end cars.. but do they tune and race cars in the Grand-Am sports car series? I personally think that's a bit more impressive and convincing of their abilities then someone who has a tune for a few exotics.

Its probable that other dedicated Porsche tuners spend more time on Porsche in general making solid tunes.. But for this particular 997TT tune, APR personally owned a 997TT and I know they went full force on this one in time and resources. So for this particular model, that is a non-issue.

Don't take this the wrong way, the other tuners in the market are great as well. In fact, I have EPL on my 996. I just really wanted to stress the fact that APR is not some Mickey Mouse company, and their 997 tune was far from neglected in the development department.
Well said..........
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #84  
Arone997tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 339
From: CT
Rep Power: 43
Arone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud of
matt, pm'ed
 
Old Jun 14, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #85  
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 249
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by skandalis447
speed21...
you made me very happy that you wont have a problem if my logs are over 1bar... that was a relief for me...
its good to have another member here with APr tune that sees the same boost as me,and also is faster than other 997TT cars,as mine...Finally i dont expect you to understand the way APR flash operates,since you did not understand my PM regarding start up noise...I really do not know how many times should i write boost is 1bar to stop questioning yourself.I believe i should write it everyday...at least two times...
What you are saying is all greek to me Skand. Totally confusing but anyway!

Originally Posted by GMP - Matthew
I will have dyno results from another car and trap times this week for you guys.
Thanks Matthew.

Is it at all possible for you to have a duramtric data log done at the same time to show the boost at WOT? A dyno may be a great time and place to do this test. Please advise. I think we are going to need more than Skand's data log at this stage in the game. Too much has gone on with this to be able to take the word of just one person.

Originally Posted by Chris Green@USP
Well hopefully I can help bring more information and data from the APR software to the community and shed some light on the subject so more 997 owners will consider.

Its probable that other dedicated Porsche tuners spend more time on Porsche in general making solid tunes..

You said it Chris.. and in doing so have hit another nail on the head.
Im only one of many 997tt 6speeders with this perception. It is also logical that someone specialising in the tuning of one particular car would have an infinately better understanding than APR in this instance regardless of them having thier own car. Afterall a "Porsche only specialist" would have had a far greater exposure especially given the quantity of vehicles they have under their belts. As APR has their own car and no data of their own regarding performance times is also quite strange. That would be far better marketing material to work with rather than fancyfull claims of being the best an so on.

But for this particular 997TT tune, APR personally owned a 997TT and I know they went full force on this one in time and resources. So for this particular model, that is a non-issue.

Maybe....but at the moment we are still a little shy of some facts and, the many that have questioned the tune will need far more concvincing than just mere words and assurances.

Don't take this the wrong way, the other tuners in the market are great as well. In fact, I have EPL on my 996. I just really wanted to stress the fact that APR is not some Mickey Mouse company, and their 997 tune was far from neglected in the development department.
Accepted. But in saying that Chris i doubt anyone here thinks they are a Mickey Mouse company....instead just a company with expertise on tuning VW's and Audi"s....and, one very shy on facts surrounding their "one and only 997tt tune"....relying purely on fanciful claims and an unusually high price tag to convince the market.
 

Last edited by speed21; Jun 14, 2010 at 07:35 PM.
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #86  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by bbywu
Thank you, but I'd prefer Matt reply as he was there during the dyno run...if he could post peak hp recorded for his baseline run...I'd like to calculate absolute % over baseline.

bob
Bob,

I posted a dyno of the stock programming with 100 octane and tubi race exhaust. I don't remember the exhaust numbers but please refer to the first page.

Friday I have gentleman coming in, he is on this board, he currently has a Speedart exhaust with 200 cell cats. We will be measuring this car with 93 fuel with stock programming and APR's 93 Performance programming (chipped mode)

Stay tuned for this as I'm equally anxious to see how much adding 200cell cats and lowering the octane level does on the dyno even though my personal thought on the subject that "speed times" are much better way to see how fast a car really is because that's exactly where most people drive their cars.
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 12:30 PM
  #87  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by TTdude
Why did you dyno in 3rd gear when most everyone believes 4th is the proper gear to dyno these cars?
I asked this question as well to Chris @ 3sx, I seem to be having a brain fart right now as I try to recall our conversation as we talked about a lot of things while I was there as I had several questions regarding the dyno as I had never heard of it until that day. He had touched on a few things regarding the dyno and the car and air flow but I can't recall specifics.

I just called and left him a voicemail at about 215pm today. I will follow up with an email here in a few as well.
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #88  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by speed21
P owners may well be able to accept the APR product in a better light if it was associated to higher end market brands such as Lamborghini, Ferrari, and Bugatti however that is not the case. Instead APR's P tune is comming off the the back of lower end car brands such as Audi and VW.

Speed21,

This is a terrible analogy. Did you not recall Keith's comments about how most tuning operations and settings that are found in most Porsches today were previously tested first on the VW/Audi platforms first? VW isn't just the leading car manufacturer on the road today in Europe because of its price tag because there are plenty of cheaper brands out there. but because of their quality...



Its a bit like Hyundai standing up on their soapbox and lording to the world how they have now mastered the tuning principles for the Ferrari brand and be now automatically qualified to be taken seriously as the grand masters of the tuning world for the Ferrari brand. Then there is the other aspect of putting a stupid high price on the tune in a bid to add some form of credibility. A hard slog as i believe APR is (and has) been having with the P fraternity with their P tune.

Again, a terrible analogy.

P owners are having a very hard time swallowing the story.

Then there is the Skandalis palava on boost which isnt helping APR at all.

Need i say more..
You keep bringing Skandalis in here because all he reads is 1 bar. His car clearly puts out more than 1bar to achieve the power APR suggests. You also seem to have a rebuttal for every answer keith gives which are basically an excuse for you not wanting to try the software which is FREE by the way. I'm also starting to wonder why your responding the way you are about APR's software when you clearly have stated that you have ZERO interest in running APR software.

For every reason you have given me for not wanting to try the APR software I have given you a legitimate answer that alleviates all your concerns.
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #89  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by The Bogg
There is just no reasonable way to make that much more power and torque without MORE BOOST!!! That's why the topic has been beaten on so much. I know you've stated that you don't know how APR works and you don't care as long as it does work but that's just not good enough for many of us to believe without questions. I wonder if there are other mods to your car that you aren't aware of.

If you look at any industry out there where there are multiple options for performance enhancement you would see that people flock to the one that offers the best bang for the buck. If the 60-130 in the 6.5-7s range is verified by other members with exhaust and just APR ECU mod on pump gas (like you use, even if it is equivalent to 95 US octane) then why on earth would anyone mod the turbos or add bigger intercoolers etc...???

I'm sure the truth will come out in the near future. I second what speed21 stated (that he had no axe to grind with APR). Of course there is no axe to grind, but when a company makes really bold claims then they better back them up with more than flowery words.

Bogg and everyone else,

I can't answer why his car is reading only 1 bar. What I can say is that I will be testing a US sold car on US soil with US fuel and these are the levels and scenarios I have access to.


Cars will be listed from fastest to slowest.

997TT APR, TUBI RACE, 100 fuel
Will test trap times in stock mode.
Will test trap times in 93 mode.
Will test traimes in 100 mode.

997TT APR, Speedart 200Cell cats, 93 Fuel
Will test in stock mode.
Will test in 93 mode.

997TT Cab, APR, Stock Exhaust, 93 Fuel
Will test in stock mode.
Will test in 93 mode.


I think for now we should just let skandalis just enjoy his car. I'm sure everyone cares more about a car here on US soil that was sold and registered here. Would you all agree?
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #90  
GMP Performance's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Site Sponsor
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,059
From: Charlotte, NC
Rep Power: 0
GMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond reputeGMP Performance has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by speed21
What you are saying is all greek to me Skand. Totally confusing but anyway!



Thanks Matthew.

Is it at all possible for you to have a duramtric data log done at the same time to show the boost at WOT? A dyno may be a great time and place to do this test. Please advise. I think we are going to need more than Skand's data log at this stage in the game. Too much has gone on with this to be able to take the word of just one person.



Accepted. But in saying that Chris i doubt anyone here thinks they are a Mickey Mouse company....instead just a company with expertise on tuning VW's and Audi"s....and, one very shy on facts surrounding their "one and only 997tt tune"....relying purely on fanciful claims and an unusually high price tag to convince the market.

Speed21 again you keep bringing up another rebuttal about the price, for those who dont know by now we are offering a group rate for $2500 or you can try it free for 6 hours. If you can't tell in 6 hours or pay for it and try it for 30 days to see if you like it or not then nothing will satisfy your needs.

Is there anything I can do to atleast get you to try this darn software for a minute?

Perhaps you may have a point and that APR should offer a detuned version of what they have right now to make the clutch last longer. Or perhaps most just need to inspect their clutches before they purchase a used car. TJclay is the only person I know who has blown out his clutch running APR software.

Sorry that is wrong.

There are two.

The clients car I dyno'd last week who runs nothing short of 100 fuel. He burnt his clutch out because he was going to the dragstrip once a month for 3 or 4 months straight doing 4 or 5 passes each event. Sometimes more when he rents the track out himself. The stock clutch is not made to drag race period even at stock power levels. I'm surprised it lasted as long as it did. Thats actually pretty impressive of the stock clutch.

Number two is TJCLAY and he purchased a used 997T so we have to throw him out because we have no way of knowing the status of his clutch at the time of purchase.

All this was explained to you speed21 in our original PM conversations before you purchased the promotive tune.


Again this goes out to everyone who wants to try the APR software, if your not happy with the results I will flash your car back to stock and purchase another brand of your choice or give you your money back 100%. No one else offers this type of service.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM.