997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

proTUNING Freaks - OEM 997.2 Turbo In-Tank fuel pumps - Flow Test Results

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 05:26 PM
  #16  
longboarder's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,439
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 272
longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !
Bump. Any more info to share?

My car found the LPFP limit. The HPFP flows better than the LPFP. At a certain speed the lamda requirement lowers requiring even more fuel at WOT (ECU adding fuel to keep EGTs constant on sustained WOT) and anyone making say 650+ wheel will experience fuel cuts due to the LPFP not being able to keep up with the fueling demand. Unless you know how to program around it you have to keep power down to maybe 600 wheel. The HP numbers are an educated guess only. Running a lot of meth helps to prevent the fuel cuts as well but still needs the ECU programming to work.
 
Old Jul 7, 2015 | 05:34 PM
  #17  
itguy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 331
Rep Power: 65
itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !itguy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by longboarder
Bump. Any more info to share?

My car found the LPFP limit. The HPFP flows better than the LPFP. At a certain speed the lamda requirement lowers requiring even more fuel at WOT (ECU adding fuel to keep EGTs constant on sustained WOT) and anyone making say 650+ wheel will experience fuel cuts due to the LPFP not being able to keep up with the fueling demand. Unless you know how to program around it you have to keep power down to maybe 600 wheel. The HP numbers are an educated guess only. Running a lot of meth helps to prevent the fuel cuts as well but still needs the ECU programming to work.
In-tank same as 997.1 or is a pwm brushless system?
 
Old Jul 8, 2015 | 02:35 AM
  #18  
93ls1rx7's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 800
From: Sumter, SC
Rep Power: 130
93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !93ls1rx7 Is a GOD !
You should be able to find a LPFP solution fairly easily.
 
Old Jul 8, 2015 | 11:50 AM
  #19  
longboarder's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,439
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 272
longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 93ls1rx7
You should be able to find a LPFP solution fairly easily.
From what I understand (which isn't much), the hardware isn't the issue...it's the software. It's why, even after 3+ years of development, there is still no effective fueling upgrade solution beyond 650-ish wheel HP.
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 12:03 PM
  #20  
jjurroz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 243
From: Miami, FL.
Rep Power: 41
jjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant futurejjurroz has a brilliant future
Perhaps you meant the other way around. It isn't a software issue, it's a hardware issue. This isn't new or specific to the porsche platform. This is an issue that every DFI platform has. The BMW community has been dealing with this since 2007 and they have yet to find a real solution. Specifically, it's an issue with the HPFP.

Originally Posted by longboarder
From what I understand (which isn't much), the hardware isn't the issue...it's the software. It's why, even after 3+ years of development, there is still no effective fueling upgrade solution beyond 650-ish wheel HP.
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 12:25 PM
  #21  
longboarder's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,439
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 272
longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !longboarder Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jjurroz
Perhaps you meant the other way around. It isn't a software issue, it's a hardware issue. This isn't new or specific to the porsche platform. This is an issue that every DFI platform has. The BMW community has been dealing with this since 2007 and they have yet to find a real solution. Specifically, it's an issue with the HPFP.
If it was simply a hardware issue, I think BBI would have solved it after years of R&D. They have built two 997.2 DI motors already. Both to 4 litres and upgraded turbos. They can't increase wheel HP on these cars beyond 6XX because they are still limited by the stock fueling. They have the hardware, but I don't think it's as simple as hooking up a more powerful LPFP to feed the HPFP. If it was, these cars would be at 1,000+ HP long ago. But they aren't because BBI did not have a fix the last time I went for a visit. They are trying believe me. I think additional programming is needed to make it all work, and this is by far the most complex part about the project. Maybe I'm wrong. But maybe not.
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 12:43 PM
  #22  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
It doesn't matter how much software you have, if the high pressure pump can't keep up you're going to have a bad time.
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 12:56 PM
  #23  
A418t81's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 581
From: Southeast
Rep Power: 128
A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !
The HPFP is the limiting step. They are very precise pumps that take very very expensive tooling and machining to build. It is rare to have an upgradable high pressure pump. APR spent over a million bucks on their Hitachi HPFP upgrade but they have a much larger economy of scale. It includes a new larger cylinder and piston in the pump and require diamond micofinishing, etc to do it right and reliably.

As per Cobb the 991 has a higher capacity HPFP than the 997.2 and wil subsequently be able to make more power.
 
Old Jul 9, 2015 | 12:57 PM
  #24  
rix's Avatar
rix
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,077
From: Dallas, TX
Rep Power: 174
rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !rix Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by A418t81
The HPFP is the limiting step. They are very precise pumps that take very very expensive tooling and machining to build. It is rare to have an upgradable high pressure pump. APR spent over a million bucks on their Hitachi HPFP upgrade but they have a much larger economy of scale. It includes a new larger cylinder and piston in the pump and require diamond micofinishing, etc to do it right and reliably.

As per Cobb the 991 has a higher capacity HPFP than the 997.2 and wil subsequently be able to make more power.
Maybe the 991 pump can be used on the 997.2? That would be an incremental step.
 
Old Jul 11, 2015 | 06:57 AM
  #25  
Stage7's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 673
From: NE
Rep Power: 81
Stage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond reputeStage7 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by rix
Maybe the 991 pump can be used on the 997.2? That would be an incremental step.
I believe Champion experimented with that and said it was not a direct bolt on.

They paused 997.2 fuel system development the last time I spoke with them due to weak demand from the high HP 997.2tt junkies. There doesn't seem to be a lot of us outside of this forum.
 
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
DoDaLeCa's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 51
From: Western Canada
Rep Power: 24
DoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud ofDoDaLeCa has much to be proud of
Based on an EWAG (Engineered Wild Assed Guess):


44 HP-hr/gal (gasoline energy content) * 374 liter/hr (fuel pump rate) * 1 gal / 3.79 liter (conversion) * ~25% thermal efficiency @ WOT = 1085 HP


This too high strictly theoretical number is just based on the fuel flow rate and energy content in the fuel, there are many other constraints (air flow, heat rejection, mechanical strength of components, etc.) that limit what a real life engine can produce.
 

Last edited by DoDaLeCa; Jul 26, 2015 at 09:41 PM.
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 06:50 AM
  #27  
MONKY LONDON's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 33
From: London
Rep Power: 14
MONKY LONDON is infamous around these partsMONKY LONDON is infamous around these parts
So how much power can I be running with just 3" short straight pipes either side and a tune? My car had fuel pump limitations just with these mods unless my exhaust makes a big difference. We had to lower boost at top of rev range etc
 
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 07:46 AM
  #28  
proTUNING Freaks's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 864
From: Toronto - Chicago
Rep Power: 0
proTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond reputeproTUNING Freaks has a reputation beyond repute
@MONKEY LONDON, there are two fuel pump types on 997.2 and later DFI turbo motors. One setup is a low pressure one with pumps in the fuel tank. This setup supplies fuel to a high pressure fuel pump (HPFP) which multiplies pressure from the low pressure side supplying it to the rail at 5-600psi at idle to 1900-2000psi at WOT. Given fuel pump flow testing on the LPFP (low pressure fuel pump side) we should be good to at least 900-950hp crank which at this point no one is near from the tuning point of view. Its the HPFP side that is the first bottleneck on pump gas. If we were talking about running straight E85 on the 997.2 though then an LPFP upgrade would most likely be the first one necessary due to ~30% higher fuel demand on the fuel system over gasoline.

Dzenno@PTF
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alevine
GT3/GT2
19
Nov 4, 2015 10:05 AM
vbb
997
7
Aug 21, 2015 10:17 PM
ModBargains
Tesla Motors Vendor Classifieds
0
Aug 20, 2015 12:28 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.