Wow, I got this PDK thing all wrong
#46
Hurray for PDK.[...] I don't really get the manual gearbox is more involved statement. For me (and I think a lot of people) rowing gears a mostly subconscious if not mundane activity, and I don’t really get any enjoyment out of it nor do I dislike it – it’s just there. Do people really find shifting gears to be something that’s fun and engaging?
That pleasure is uniquely the contribution of a manual, but the PDK provides its own unique pleasures. Nice to have a choice these days.
Gary
#47
Actually, manual gearboxes are less involving. With a manual, you can't do so many things necessary for optimum performance driving so you need not waste the brain bites. For example, short shifting in turns to optimize fill throttle upon exit, down shifting during turns, and my favorite, downshifting under extreme braking (straight or while turning). Truth is, manual gearboxes are so inefficient you spend most your time trying to ensure you're precise with the shifts rather than optimizing car placement and gear selection for the exact condition. One needs to shift far more often than a manual gearbox car driver is willing to do. Given the same route/distance, any driver would shift more often and therefore drive in the optimum gear more often using the PDK vs. manual. It's simply a more usable tool and therefore the driver is more involved. Please don't tell me you think left foot usage qualifies as more involved vs. your brain? It's left foot/right hand vs. 2 hands so that's equal in terms of appendages. Ultimately PDK is the thinking man's gearbox. All I know is I'm much quicker around Nurburgring using PDK than a manual. It's more fun too.
#49
[quote=Steve997S;3306085]Ultimately PDK is the thinking man's gearbox. quote]
First Porsche tells me that the manual is for comfort driving and that PDK is for performance driving, and now Steve tells me that PDK is the thinking man's gearbox. So if I don't have a PDK, I don't think, but I'm comfortable. Sounds like a Pink Floyd cut.
First Porsche tells me that the manual is for comfort driving and that PDK is for performance driving, and now Steve tells me that PDK is the thinking man's gearbox. So if I don't have a PDK, I don't think, but I'm comfortable. Sounds like a Pink Floyd cut.
#50
I think that is an accurate observation. PDK (and all of the other variations of the dual-clutch gearbox) are still relatively new to the non-supercar buyer and I think people are still hesitant to buy into it. So I'd say for the immediate future (next 3 or 4 years) the traditional manual will likely outsell the PDK. But once people see that they are the next evolution in transmissions and here to stay, we will see a large sway the other direction in just a short time span.
#51
Maybe most of us could agree that both manual and PDK are great, but in different ways and for different reasons? I have manual in my 911, and automatic with paddle shifters in my C63, and am glad to have this variety, since each lends itself to a different sort of driving experience.
#52
Well, since PDK is a crossover between the two transmissions, I would think the correct answer would be boxer-briefs (which BTW are the only correct choice in underwear)
#54
nice.
#55
I'm sure there were mathematicians saying the same kind of stuff when calculators first became available. "You are taking the challenge and fun out of math by not having to figure out the problem yourself!" But the fact is, this is the direction we are headed, and there really isn't much that any of us can do about it.
Last edited by mander; 09-05-2011 at 08:01 PM.
#57
MY error. I meant interface issues NEVER reliability.
#58
I think that is an accurate observation. PDK (and all of the other variations of the dual-clutch gearbox) are still relatively new to the non-supercar buyer and I think people are still hesitant to buy into it. So I'd say for the immediate future (next 3 or 4 years) the traditional manual will likely outsell the PDK. But once people see that they are the next evolution in transmissions and here to stay, we will see a large sway the other direction in just a short time span.
For someone else, Porsche doesnt sell PDK in the GT cars due to it not working with the GT1 Mezger engine, not because of HP or track reliability. It is offered in the Turbo S which has more HP. You will see PDK in the 991 GT cars for sure.
#59
Question, the PDK transmission in the Turbo S the same as the one in the C2 and C4? Hopefully it is because then if you want to add forced induction, it will easily handle the power.
#60
whewww! Just read all 4 pages of this and boy is there a lot of mis-information about how PDK works. Search back at some of our threads if you want a little closer look at the PDK in general.
One comment sort of caught my attention right on page 1.
adias....we're based in Florida and I'm not familiar with this race team. More interestingly, I'd love to know how they simply "open the tranny and close the tranny", as the Porsche PDK is a non-serviceable unit. This means that is literally has to be CUT open in order to inspect the clutch packs. You can not open it like a GTR tranny or even the Audi/VW DSG. I wasn't aware that there was anyone else out there who has done this besides us, let alone right in our back yard.
One comment sort of caught my attention right on page 1.
On the 2nd paragraph... is that so? Are you familiar with a professional racing team based in FL racing an S with a PDK? Do you know that after a racing season, they opened the tranny thinking the clutches needed replacement and to their surprise they looked like new and just closed the tranny?