997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

C4 or C2

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #1  
TAnthony's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 208
From: Fairfield County, CT
Rep Power: 28
TAnthony is infamous around these parts
C4 or C2

Considering my first 997 - don't care about weather so much as driving experience - can anybody comment on the primary experience between the two - all wheel or rear drive?

I've heard C2= Pure Porsche while C4 is for those who want to (for some reason) take it out in bad weather....

More detail on the feel of the car with the two drive systems would be certainly appreciated....I'm leaning toward a C2 since I feel that would fit how I like to drive better....

Thanks - T
 
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 06:23 PM
  #2  
jlingk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 389
From: USA
Rep Power: 36
jlingk is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by TAnthony
I've heard C2= Pure Porsche while C4 is for those who want to (for some reason) take it out in bad weather....
you shouldn't pay attention to all the BS like that you read on these boards (especially this board). A lot of people here feel that if you're not driving a six speed S stripped down with only sport shifter, SportChrono and PSE you might as well be driving a Miata.

The C4 has a wider stance is more stable during aggressive maneuvers. Traction is insane. More balanced drive. Faster out of turns. A bit heavier though.

The back end on the C2 is going to be a bit looser (esp if you have spacers) and require more driver skill during the same maneuvers.

I drove both hard and bought the 4 for the increased traction and handling since 90% of my driving is on streets where your speed is limited.

The 997TT is AWD, if that car isn't "purely porsche" nothing is. I don't think that car was designed just for those who want to drive in bad weather.

You can't miss with any Pcar. They're all fun as hell to drive.
 

Last edited by jlingk; Jun 15, 2006 at 06:35 PM.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 06:25 AM
  #3  
Ronnie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37
From: good old England
Rep Power: 23
Ronnie is infamous around these parts
take out both for a number of extended test drives and then decide.

do not decide after driving in each for 15 mins.

personally I much prefer rear wheel drive.

jlingk, I agree the awd 997TT is "purely porsche", but I bet the 997GT2 will be and then some ;p
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #4  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
I echo that sentiment: drive both over extended journeys and then decide. They feel very different; and depending what you're used to one will feel natural and the other odd. Neither is right or wrong: just don't get caught up in the bad weather bs. Porsche did not engineer the awd system specifically to counter bad weather. Either way you can't go wrong.
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #5  
LIL RAJA's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,049
From: Bangladesh/Herndon VA & DC
Rep Power: 322
LIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant futureLIL RAJA has a brilliant future
how can you drive them both for extensive time?
they will only let u test drive for like 15 minutes.

raja
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #6  
shiggins's Avatar
Official Dipshit 2006
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,604
From: .
Rep Power: 86
shiggins is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by jlingk
The 997TT is AWD, if that car isn't "purely porsche" nothing is. I don't think that car was designed just for those who want to drive in bad weather.

You can't miss with any Pcar. They're all fun as hell to drive.
This is just me talking, but I would say the GT3/2 is purely Porsche. I can't see an AWD luxo Porsche being pure. Again, that's just me.

I can't agree with your last statement more, however.
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
jlingk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 389
From: USA
Rep Power: 36
jlingk is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by shiggins
This is just me talking, but I would say the GT3/2 is purely Porsche. I can't see an AWD luxo Porsche being pure. Again, that's just me.
Interesting viewpoint. The very first Porsche Car (Type 360 Cisitalia) was AWD. Appealing interiors have been a big part of Porsche's focus since the 356. Underneath the "Luxo" interior, the 997TT is a straight up racer and the most mechanically and electronically advanced production sports car ever built.

The GT cars are built for entirely different purposes. You might as well throw the RS Spyder in there too.

 

Last edited by jlingk; Jun 16, 2006 at 05:48 PM.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #8  
Ronnie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37
From: good old England
Rep Power: 23
Ronnie is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by LIL RAJA
how can you drive them both for extensive time?
they will only let u test drive for like 15 minutes.

raja
I guess it depends on your dealership. Mine invited me out to a unused airfield and then also let me try a number of versions at my convenience.

I certainly would not be parting with £70-80k (US$129,436 - US$147,927) or £103000 (US$190,457) for the Turbo with no options, to any dealership that expected me to place an order off the back of a short test drive.
 

Last edited by Ronnie; Jun 16, 2006 at 01:12 PM.
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #9  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
Change dealer

Originally Posted by LIL RAJA
how can you drive them both for extensive time?
they will only let u test drive for like 15 minutes.

raja
If your dealer is only letting you drive for 15 minutes he's not interested in your business. Find another dealer who will let you try both for up to half a day each.
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #10  
C4Cortez's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 114
From: midwest
Rep Power: 25
C4Cortez is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Le Chef
If your dealer is only letting you drive for 15 minutes he's not interested in your business. Find another dealer who will let you try both for up to half a day each.
Exactly. Present yourself as a serious customer (you shouldn't have to prove your intentions to the dealer to purchase- but pulling up in your current Cayenne S couldn't hurt), if the dealer won't find some way to get you a few hours with whatever demo's they have access to, then the dealer isn't hungry enough for your business; there are plenty of dealers who are.
 
Old Jun 16, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #11  
996turbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,187
From: S. California
Rep Power: 110
996turbo is infamous around these parts
I'd get a C2S over a C4.....however, a C4S would be my first pic if that were an option.
 
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #12  
THE STIG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 204
From: Buenos Aires
Rep Power: 29
THE STIG is infamous around these parts
AWD in Carreras were meant for BAD WEATHER and that's it!

It does not have anything to do with an AWD TT. The TT MUST have AWD since it has insane power when a regular carrera doesn't!!!

I know you are asking "Then how come GT3/GT2 or CGT" are not AWD... the answer is simple... Those cars are the closest thing to a RACE CAR. Better suspension and other thingies will make it handle a lot better than AWD systems.

ALSO... AWD is better grip, not better handling.

So... from what I've driven and had in the past and present i think AWD is not only a waste of weight but a waste of money if you are not gonna be driving in bad weather conditions. But this is just me, remember that.
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #13  
jlingk's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 389
From: USA
Rep Power: 36
jlingk is infamous around these parts
These are the kinds of people that I'm talking about. AWD in the Turbo is not simply implemented because of the power. PTM handles transfer of the torque to the road. Any question about this, read the Porsche website.

"Car Handling is a description of the way wheeled vehicles perform transverse to their direction of motion, particularly during cornering and swerving. It also includes their stability when moving in a straight line."

You cannot separate traction from handling. If you don't think that an AWD does the above better than a squirrely C2 at speed you have never driven them both.

Here's what Porsche has to say about the AWD system in the C4 and what the approach was behind it:

"At the center of the Carrera 4’s intelligent all-wheel drive is a viscous clutch that reads traction at all four corners and instantly transfers an additional 5 to 40 percent of the engine’s power to the front axle for maximum grip, even on changing road surfaces. The multiple-disc clutch consists of a series of interleaved plates. The space between these plates is filled with a high-viscosity silicone fluid. If the front and rear axles begin to rotate at different speeds, the frictional properties of the silicone fluid cause torque to be directed towards the plates that are rotating more slowly. At least 5 percent of drive torque is applied to the front wheels at all times. Under daily driving conditions, the average rear/front torque split is approximately 65/35, resulting in laser-true tracking at speed and unprecedented control through the tightest corners."
 
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #14  
THE STIG's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 204
From: Buenos Aires
Rep Power: 29
THE STIG is infamous around these parts
You should see the BEST MOTORING video that tested the 997C2S(RWD) 997C(RWD) and 996TT (AWD)...

Guess who won?

I used to have a 996TT... It has amazing GRIP!!! But it doesn't handle as better as the 997S!!! It just doesn't!!! I know that 997TT with PASM will do it for sure. But that's my point, again, improved chasis and suspension.
 
Old Jun 20, 2006 | 06:53 AM
  #15  
pilone's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,493
From: Pescara, Italy
Rep Power: 164
pilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nicepilone is just really nice
I think the C2 has more skills...it should be better to drive to have fun!
I'd go for it! better with an " S "
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.