A3076 vs. A28 vs. K16G vs. K24 Dyno Overlay
#181
I don't think its a minority with straight line guys and guys that want more power on the street on this forum..
I have noticed there are more 'bench racers' in the wannabe road racer crowd from seeing that in the PCA meetings and talk on the forums .. Talking and doing is to different things.. As proving yourself is also.
Anyone can buy road racing equipment for there car and talk but never bring their car to a competitive race that matters or has them use their car like they brag about.. But they can talk like they did to guys who do not know better..
I really do not see not to much proof of competitive road racing or lap times being bragged about on here as we see straight line achievements??
Just Saying...Maybe I am missing something ..LOL..
I have noticed there are more 'bench racers' in the wannabe road racer crowd from seeing that in the PCA meetings and talk on the forums .. Talking and doing is to different things.. As proving yourself is also.
Anyone can buy road racing equipment for there car and talk but never bring their car to a competitive race that matters or has them use their car like they brag about.. But they can talk like they did to guys who do not know better..
I really do not see not to much proof of competitive road racing or lap times being bragged about on here as we see straight line achievements??
Just Saying...Maybe I am missing something ..LOL..
acceleration right around the corner
btw, when are you pullin the trigger on those 3071s?
and have you looked into the 3073s?
methinks I know somebody whos got 'em
#182
I don't believe they would spool quicker then a 3071?
You already can make enough power that the stock block can not handle with the 3071s and probably can not make more power with them over 3071s on 93 pump gas??
So I don't think they would be any advantage for me?
But I don't know the details on them..
I am really happy with my K24/18g set-up but when it gets warm outside and I go on this site ,,I get the bug to pull the plug on them..LOL
#183
I know nothing about the 3073s.
I don't believe they would spool quicker then a 3071?
You already can make enough power that the stock block can not handle with the 3071s and probably can not make more power with them over 3071s on 93 pump gas??
So I don't think they would be any advantage for me?
But I don't know the details on them..
I am really happy with my K24/18g set-up but when it gets warm outside and I go on this site ,,I get the bug to pull the plug on them..LOL
I don't believe they would spool quicker then a 3071?
You already can make enough power that the stock block can not handle with the 3071s and probably can not make more power with them over 3071s on 93 pump gas??
So I don't think they would be any advantage for me?
But I don't know the details on them..
I am really happy with my K24/18g set-up but when it gets warm outside and I go on this site ,,I get the bug to pull the plug on them..LOL
from a customer down south America. Gregg at Tial has some info on them
as well.
There's no appreciable difference in spool from a 71 to a 73 and it's a
very good value considering the minimal price difference vs. the gain
#184
Btw, the data that Sambo has is on 93 pump and it's damn impressive.
No way you could do that on 71s.
Wouldn't hurt to look into it....
No way you could do that on 71s.
Wouldn't hurt to look into it....
#185
Hi Paulie,
of course not. We did not calculate the loss. It get's measured on the dyno: drag losses vs the measured rwhp.
Different dynos show different results that need to be interpretated. 12% losses would mean 84 HP for a 700 HP car. That figure is totally off.
I personally don't like the reverse calculation at all and am pretty happy with rwhp. That's all that matters.
But the assumptions on what the losses would be are way off to my taste and a % value is not what I would consider being a valid approach. At least not for all involved components.
Andreas
of course not. We did not calculate the loss. It get's measured on the dyno: drag losses vs the measured rwhp.
Different dynos show different results that need to be interpretated. 12% losses would mean 84 HP for a 700 HP car. That figure is totally off.
I personally don't like the reverse calculation at all and am pretty happy with rwhp. That's all that matters.
But the assumptions on what the losses would be are way off to my taste and a % value is not what I would consider being a valid approach. At least not for all involved components.
Andreas
loss on an inertia dyno. These percentages, especially the big ones, were
a creation of tuners. Porsche drivetrains are amongst the most efficient
in the world. The awd inherently has more friction losses then the rwd
but neither are as high as popular opinion has them.
We have a half dozen shops in Birmingham with ex NASCAR guys. Several
engine dynos and those guys are quick to tell you that a chassis dyno
is good for tuning and nothing else. They'll also tell you that big drivetrain
losses are the stories of performance shops and tuners lol.
Turbocharged is even more iffy. You can't use SAE correction and more
then not, you can't get the fans to mimic 130 mph.
I like to do it to see the gains from build to build and I like to calculate
double digit drivetrain loss to make me feel better but I know the deal lol.
#186
Not saying any tuner would ever do this, but this is the easiest way to find some extra 100 HP ...
#187
You better have 2 or 3 sets of straps holding it down...That would shoot your car off the dyno like a rocket...
#188
BTW: strap it down harder and it will have more losses as well.
#189
Layinback, You run your keys all the time not know a damn thing about the history of the people you attack. Try biting your lip, the guy you think you superior too has been there and done that. Tuning? it right or is wrong.. there is NO MAGIC.. Some software works better then others but if your afr is what it should be and your timing is the same then thats all a tune will do. The magic is in the engine. The parts how things flow as a unit. You hang your hat on a record for A28's I say why use a A28 when a A30 does so much more.... Oh wait A28 is the cut off where you really need a fuel system and other hard learned items that most dont talk about. I know one thing for sure. Guys who cant make power rip the weight out of the car, Honda style.
Clearly the mods you have made to your engine would be no good on a road course
#190
tell us about magic markski 3073s
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
#191
#192
I don't know anything 'bout "magic markski" but I could tell you a thing or
two about magic mushrooms circa 1978 - 1981
After researching builds, I noticed a definite pattern of reliability
issues with setups producing more then 800 - 850 whp.
Some are more reliable then others but overall, like all cars, the 996TT
reaches a "critical mass" of performance and going beyond that, doesn't
lend itself to daily drivability. Not to say that all of this can't be figured
but at some point we gotta look at "cost vs. benefit"
The 3073s work based on these observations. With some gearing and
weight reduction, I think it's gonna be pretty good.
By the way, Markskis not involved with this build.
two about magic mushrooms circa 1978 - 1981
After researching builds, I noticed a definite pattern of reliability
issues with setups producing more then 800 - 850 whp.
Some are more reliable then others but overall, like all cars, the 996TT
reaches a "critical mass" of performance and going beyond that, doesn't
lend itself to daily drivability. Not to say that all of this can't be figured
but at some point we gotta look at "cost vs. benefit"
The 3073s work based on these observations. With some gearing and
weight reduction, I think it's gonna be pretty good.
By the way, Markskis not involved with this build.
#193
After researching builds, I noticed a definite pattern of reliability
issues with setups producing more then 800 - 850 whp.
Some are more reliable then others but overall, like all cars, the 996TT
reaches a "critical mass" of performance and going beyond that, doesn't
lend itself to daily drivability. Not to say that all of this can't be figured
but at some point we gotta look at "cost vs. benefit"
issues with setups producing more then 800 - 850 whp.
Some are more reliable then others but overall, like all cars, the 996TT
reaches a "critical mass" of performance and going beyond that, doesn't
lend itself to daily drivability. Not to say that all of this can't be figured
but at some point we gotta look at "cost vs. benefit"
#194
isn't that 600? give or take.. though folks with more power will always tell you differently? i mean issues always crop up, whether it's blown mafs from raised rev limiters ( though johnspd in here has never had that happen lol ( beat ya to it john! ).. but then there's mafless tunes, and then you're into other stuff, so at what point does one "call it a day" with a balance of power vs daily driveability? do 800+ hp tt's drive well in traffic and stop/go whatever? as they do on a track? dumb questions perhaps.. but i've always wondered.
I m very happy with my setup, I m waiting the second file from Todd to turn the boost up.Right now I have only 0,9bar.
#195
i had spoken with them about that recently. haven't done anything about it.. since there's nothing "wrong" with the tune i have now. it's just old. but just bailing on the maf might well be worth the price of a new tune.