Spotted this damaged brand new CGT (pix)...
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 190
From: Toronto/ HK
Rep Power: 30
Spotted this damaged brand new CGT (pix)...
spotted this CGT while picking up a car with my friend today at Pfaff. Heard the damage was done during transportation (this is a $60K CAD damage) and the owner refuse to take deliver..... I wonder who would
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,541
From: CHIIIICAAAGOOO
Rep Power: 169
Originally posted by Godzirra
I don't blame him. I wouldn't want to pay that $$ for a car that is repaired (sometimes never the same). I would rather save $$ and buy used or search for another new.
I don't blame him. I wouldn't want to pay that $$ for a car that is repaired (sometimes never the same). I would rather save $$ and buy used or search for another new.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,073
From: Minneapolis, Mn
Rep Power: 1071
I would have refused it as well. He should not have to deal with that "hit" (No pun inteneded) in his pocket for somebody else's mistake/carelessness. Even though it looks like a simple fix, it is probably going to cost thoulsands of $ to make it right. I would be PISSED!
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,575
From: Los Angeles, CA
Rep Power: 682
Originally posted by KraSE
Wouldn't they just need to replace the damaged, it is not like the car is damaged beyond repair???
maybe the owner was just looking for a excuse to bail out on his new purchase??
Wouldn't they just need to replace the damaged, it is not like the car is damaged beyond repair???
maybe the owner was just looking for a excuse to bail out on his new purchase??
Banned
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,293
From: New York, NY; Pittsburgh, PA
Rep Power: 0
Originally posted by KraSE
Wouldn't they just need to replace the damaged, it is not like the car is damaged beyond repair???
maybe the owner was just looking for a excuse to bail out on his new purchase??
Wouldn't they just need to replace the damaged, it is not like the car is damaged beyond repair???
maybe the owner was just looking for a excuse to bail out on his new purchase??
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,619
From: here and there
Rep Power: 88
Originally posted by LUIS95993
I would have refused it as well. He should not have to deal with that "hit" (No pun inteneded) in his pocket for somebody else's mistake/carelessness. Even though it looks like a simple fix, it is probably going to cost thoulsands of $ to make it right. I would be PISSED!
I would have refused it as well. He should not have to deal with that "hit" (No pun inteneded) in his pocket for somebody else's mistake/carelessness. Even though it looks like a simple fix, it is probably going to cost thoulsands of $ to make it right. I would be PISSED!
damn shipping companies...
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 65
From: Las Vegas
Rep Power: 25
You have got to love these shippers. I had a 70 GTO RA 4 car being transported a few months ago and it got loose in the truck and ran into the new 612 Ferrrari in front of it. Both cars were damaged but I think the Ferrrai owner was more angry than I was?
I wouldn't take a new car if it was wrecked while being delivered under any cirumstances. Too many new cars out there why buy one damaged already?
I wouldn't take a new car if it was wrecked while being delivered under any cirumstances. Too many new cars out there why buy one damaged already?
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,763
From: Burlington/Marco island
Rep Power: 269
I was there today thinking that I could maybe get a killer deal. Shipper neglected to properly secure the car and it bounced around and bumped into hard stuff. The purchaser did indeed back out, however, they had the car sold to someone else within 24 hours. I gathered they didn't have to discount it too much to move it (repaired of course).
