360 Stradale vs. SL vs. 430 F1
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the SL...
Last edited by RPM; May 18, 2009 at 10:31 AM.
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the CS...
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the SL...
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vpr80
Automobiles For Sale
9
Mar 6, 2021 12:11 PM
vogz
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
5
Oct 12, 2015 08:46 AM







