Lamborghini Discussion on the Lamborghini Countach, Diablo, Murciélago, Gallardo, Reventón, Aventador, and new Huracán.

360 Stradale vs. SL vs. 430 F1

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 13, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #1  
TAndujar's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
From: Luquillo, Puerto Rico
Rep Power: 20
TAndujar is infamous around these parts
360 Stradale vs. SL vs. 430 F1

Could anyone please comment on how the Lambo SL compares to the Ferrari 360 Stradale and the 430 F1?

Nick
 
Old May 17, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
boca996tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,101
From: Huntington NY & boca raton florida
Rep Power: 106
boca996tt is just really niceboca996tt is just really niceboca996tt is just really niceboca996tt is just really nice
out of those 3 I would take the lambo
 
Old May 17, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #3  
RPM's Avatar
RPM
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 317
From: Boston - Miami
Rep Power: 44
RPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud ofRPM has much to be proud of
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the SL...
 

Last edited by RPM; May 18, 2009 at 10:31 AM.
Old May 18, 2009 | 02:03 AM
  #4  
FR305's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39
From: Miami, FL
Rep Power: 19
FR305 is infamous around these parts
Old May 18, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
vincentdds's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,522
From: NW
Rep Power: 275
vincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond reputevincentdds has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by RPM
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the CS...
Agree 100%. You nailed everything about the CS. The SL is a failed attempt by Lambo in creating a CS version of a gallardo.
 
Old May 18, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #6  
roncfpz's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 564
From: Orlando
Rep Power: 87
roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !roncfpz Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by FR305
And that was a Scud not "just a 430" and less than a sec difference. Best way to decide is to drive them all. The SL e-gear is just fine. The ceramics are very touchy. I went with the steel ones for that reason. The interior in the SL is superior IMHO.
 
Old May 20, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #7  
racerboyrt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
From: CA
Rep Power: 21
racerboyrt is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by RPM
the CS is very responsive...steering is very direct. brakes are sensitive at low speed (around town). the shifts are very fast, may be considered jerky compared with the new double clutch of the california but for me feels like a real race car which i enjoy...the ride is stiff but over bumps and railroad track and pothole surprisingly compliant...the seating position is low (for me at least, im only 5 ft 6in). the 430 is really comfortable...the winter setting lightens up the suspension noticeably, and the car will shift for you at low revs...the exhaust is also softer...once you put it in race, the exact opposite will occur....the 430 can def. be used as a daily driver in comparison to the CS...thats why i had to have both!....the SL on the otherhand was very dissappointing...was choosing between the SL and the CS...the SL egear is awful...and the brakes were very bad...i thought the CS ceramics were sensitive, the SL ceramics cannot be modulated at all in my opinion...and in general i think the CS is just a better looking car than the SL...
Completely agree. The SL was a complete dissapointment except for the noise. The car sounds quite fantastic but it is no comparison for the Ferrari's. The engineering of the Lamborghini simply isn't up to par with the Fcars. When I drove the SL I was happy to get out of it. When I drove the 430, I didn't want to get out of it but I prob wouldn't own it. When driving the CS I could only think of how to get one.
 
Old May 20, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #8  
4retr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 136
From: So Cal
Rep Power: 24
4retr is infamous around these parts
Being a passenger in a Stradale did it for me. On my way home after I picked up my Stradale all I kept saying to myself was why I hadn't gotten one sooner.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vpr80
Automobiles For Sale
9
Mar 6, 2021 12:11 PM
Mathme
Cayenne 958
4
Mar 23, 2016 11:47 AM
COBB Tuning
GT3/GT2
3
Nov 3, 2015 08:39 AM
vogz
Automotive Parts & Accessories For Sale/Wanted
5
Oct 12, 2015 08:46 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 PM.