Lamborghini Discussion on the Lamborghini Countach, Diablo, Murciélago, Gallardo, Reventón, Aventador, and new Huracán.

Ford GT or Aventador

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #106  
mikegr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 485
From: greece
Rep Power: 34
mikegr is infamous around these parts
Lambos are targeting to those few people that are careless about buying and maintenance cost. Rest may buy Ford, GTR or whatever...
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #107  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by mikegr
Lambos are targeting to those few people that are careless about buying and maintenance cost. Rest may buy Ford, GTR or whatever...
Forgive my ignorance - what do you mean by this?
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #108  
mikegr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 485
From: greece
Rep Power: 34
mikegr is infamous around these parts
Well, I definately dont underestimate GT and GTR...
just try to describe the difference from a supercar to an exotic
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #109  
HIRISC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,193
From: Minneapolis
Rep Power: 206
HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by mikegr
Lambos are targeting to those few people that are careless about buying and maintenance cost. Rest may buy Ford, GTR or whatever...
We agree.
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #110  
HIRISC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,193
From: Minneapolis
Rep Power: 206
HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by jaspergtr
Forgive my ignorance - what do you mean by this?
He meant buyers of Lambo's don't suffer the worries of depreciation or maintenance cost/hassle.

The rest of us who do buy Ford's, Nissan's (and Chevy's).
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:06 AM
  #111  
jaspergtr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !jaspergtr Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by mikegr
Well, I definately dont underestimate GT and GTR...
just try to describe the difference from a supercar to an exotic
Roger.
Originally Posted by HIRISC
He meant buyers of Lambo's don't suffer the worries of depreciation or maintenance cost/hassle.

The rest of us who do buy Ford's, Nissan's (and Chevy's).
Thanks!

Agreed.

(Maybe one of the reasons I am one of those eagerly awaiting the release of the C7)
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:22 AM
  #112  
mikegr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 485
From: greece
Rep Power: 34
mikegr is infamous around these parts
no offence ofcourse.
Basically i saw a F360 recently as a next car over my 4s. 10.000 miles, 60k$ awesome...
Then heard about horrible maintenance stories like 20-30K$ and i felt like HIRISC, as i said to myself "what the **** im not going to spend a fortune for a budget, i can buy a 996TT for less which is actually a better car and performer."
However i bet that if GM or Ford wanted to built a car similar to a Lambo would cost no less...
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:25 AM
  #113  
HIRISC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,193
From: Minneapolis
Rep Power: 206
HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !HIRISC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by mikegr
However i bet that if GM or Ford wanted to built a car similar to a Lambo would cost no less...
Ford already did - GT
Chevy already did - ZR1
Nissan already did - GTR
Audi already did - Aventador

 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 11:27 AM
  #114  
mikegr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 485
From: greece
Rep Power: 34
mikegr is infamous around these parts
well, i wouldn't call them exotics...nor Aventador as an Audi...
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #115  
ROCK's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
From: Miami FL
Rep Power: 46
ROCK is just really niceROCK is just really niceROCK is just really niceROCK is just really niceROCK is just really nice
Originally Posted by mikegr
well, i wouldn't call them exotics...nor Aventador as an Audi...
You don't see the Ford GT as an exotic ?
The damn thing is as beautiful as can be. Get one, you'll see.
 
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 03:08 PM
  #116  
Superfly's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 715
From: Earth
Rep Power: 65
Superfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant futureSuperfly has a brilliant future
The big after the Aventador - Audi comment *should* have made the point self-evident. I guess not.....

If you've never driven the GT, I'd suggest you hold off on your discounting it as not an exotic. The thing is a beauty AND a beast at the same time. And it's an absolutely magical car. I'll never sell mine. In fact, I'd buy another if I could.

As for the choices of the OP, a better comparison might be TWO Ford GT's or an Aventador. And if that was the choice, I'd take the GT's. And TT one of them with the extra cash left over. But maybe that's just me. And don't get me wrong, the Lambo is an AMAZING car. Groundbreaking probably. I'd just choose the Ford.
 

Last edited by Superfly; Jan 25, 2012 at 03:15 PM.
Old Jan 25, 2012 | 05:21 PM
  #117  
Turbroe's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 150
From: Northern NJ, USA
Rep Power: 25
Turbroe is a jewel in the roughTurbroe is a jewel in the roughTurbroe is a jewel in the rough
If a key concern is preservation of capital, Waxer brings up a solid point. I believe the FGT has weathered very well in the depreciation category, losing a surprisingly little percentage over a number of years. Flagship Lambos have, historically, not demonstrated this same behavior. The Aventador is new and thus untested in the depreciation world. My sense is that it will depreciate less than the typical Lambo for 2-3 years, but will then take a turn toward what Lambo depreciation has historically demonstrated. But, even having said all this, the answer is simple... What one excites you more? That is the path you should follow and forget the numbers. Just my .02
 
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 07:04 AM
  #118  
dyc1077's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 492
From: Cupertino
Rep Power: 46
dyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud ofdyc1077 has much to be proud of
I love the comments in this thread. The aventador is just an audi. Ate you guys forgetting that the FORD GT is just a Ford and even badged as such?
 
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 02:59 PM
  #119  
Shadowboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 130
From: san francisco
Rep Power: 21
Shadowboost is infamous around these parts
Yeah, an Audi with a goddamn 700 hp V12. I'd take an Aventador over a Ford GT everytime. If I really feel a need for speed, I'd just get a SPE GTR, AMS GTR, or UGR GTT.
 
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 04:09 PM
  #120  
Bonsaischaap's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14
From: -
Rep Power: 0
Bonsaischaap is infamous around these parts
Aside from the obvious price difference between the two (that many have already brought up) and of course the - admittedly - expected depreciation of the Aventador, another good reason to go for the GT is that the design is much more 'timeless'. Most Lambo's have a habit of looking somewhat old/dated pretty fast, at least in my view. The GT has a much more classic design (which arguably makes it dated to begin with ) that I feel will still be just as desirable in ten or fifteen years as it is now.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 AM.