Quad-Charged R35
Quad-Charged R35
Here's the link:
http://www.powerenterpriseusa.net/Po...trex-news.html
Here's the vid In Japanese:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aSR5Vd4eRM
http://www.powerenterpriseusa.net/Po...trex-news.html
Here's the vid In Japanese:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aSR5Vd4eRM
I know that this has also been done on the ford GT's but you would think there would be a point at which the superchargers would actually hamper the air flow once the turbos really got spooled up....
Rather just add better flowing turbos to spool faster and more efficient, but good looking engine bay and design.
Trending Topics
Not my first choice had I to make it but interesting nontheless. Added weight on a car thats already a porker is unnessary imho especially with the capabilities of the stock engine and higher boost. Id give up the added low end and weight of the SC units for no weight gain and just more boost from turbos afterall this car is more than just straightline. Would hate to upset the weight balance/electronic suspension setup the factory worked hard to nearly perfect.
Last edited by snakebitten; Jul 6, 2009 at 02:58 PM.
I think it is overdone. Fancy point to sell an unique system. But more parts to breakdown. If the driver just keeps rev mid-high rpm, only turbo modified GTR should have plenty of power without much turbo lack. Add a supercharger helps low rpm torque but no real benefit to high rpm torque or horsepower. With same engine internal parts&boost pressure, turbo only or Turbo+SuperC should yield close number of high rpm HP/Torque.
Last edited by aroonkl; Jul 7, 2009 at 03:10 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
35, charged, clear, end, engine, gain, low, quad, quadcharged, r35, sidemarkers, speed, torque, turbo, twincharging





