996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

MS 109 vs C16

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #1  
robmd99's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,597
From: Texas
Rep Power: 205
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
MS 109 vs C16

What are the pros and cons of both?
Thanks
Robert
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by robmd99
What are the pros and cons of both?
Thanks
Robert
In in most if not call cases I have been able to archive MBT before reaching detonation on both c16 and 109. This tells me that for most applications ms 109 is as good of a choose as c16.

I reserve c16 for very high boost, nitrous or VERY high horsepower stock motor applications.

For what its worth, my personal car runs over 2 bar of boost very regularly on ms 109.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:38 AM
  #3  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
109 is unleaded and C16 is leaded. If you have cats and O2 sensors, do not run C16. I run 109 and it is very, very good.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #4  
robertp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,272
From: California
Rep Power: 161
robertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud ofrobertp has much to be proud of
Originally Posted by Tony@epl

For what its worth, my personal car runs over 2 bar of boost very regularly on ms 109.
Tony, is that on stock internals?
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
robmd99's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,597
From: Texas
Rep Power: 205
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
Tony
Thanks for your words of wisdom, I currently run MS109 but I have removed by cats so I am debating on which one I should use? I hope others can chime in please.
Robert
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #6  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by robmd99
Tony
Thanks for your words of wisdom, I currently run MS109 but I have removed by cats so I am debating on which one I should use? I hope others can chime in please.
Robert
My guess is you will see little to no gain...
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 08:47 AM
  #7  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by robertp
Tony, is that on stock internals?

Very mildly built 2.7t Audi engine...not a 996tt, should have specified.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:00 AM
  #8  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
isn't C16 a lot more "corrosive' than ms109, ie... don't let it sit in your tank for any period of time? I always used C16 in my turbo bikes and always had to drain after every race, or you will have a destroyed fuel system and everything dyed blue!!!
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #9  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ttboost
isn't C16 a lot more "corrosive' than ms109, ie... don't let it sit in your tank for any period of time? I always used C16 in my turbo bikes and always had to drain after every race, or you will have a destroyed fuel system and everything dyed blue!!!

Correct, its very corrosive. I have seen external wastegastes stick closed because of c16 corrosion....not really good if you like being able to control boost .
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 09:45 AM
  #10  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tony@epl
Correct, its very corrosive. I have seen external wastegastes stick closed because of c16 corrosion....not really good if you like being able to control boost .
Exactly...me too, also ruins o-rings and other soft parts of fuel system components. Do yourself a favor and stay away from C16 unless you're running MONSTER boost and can drain your fuel after anything other than daily use.
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 01:59 PM
  #11  
robmd99's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,597
From: Texas
Rep Power: 205
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
Hmmmm so why do many of the Porsche guys run C-16 if they are only running 1.8 bars?
Robert
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #12  
Tony@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 975
From: CT
Rep Power: 0
Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !Tony@epl Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by robmd99
Hmmmm so why do many of the Porsche guys run C-16 if they are only running 1.8 bars?
Robert

Im sure its what their tuner has told them to run.....
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #13  
robmd99's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,597
From: Texas
Rep Power: 205
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
but is there a reason in your opinion?
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #14  
ttboost's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
C16 is higher octane and might be "safer", but again I think you would only reap the benefits at huge boost levels. For our cars I think huge boost levels are over 1.6 -1.7 bar. It also cost more and MS109 seems to do the trick as far as tuners go. Maybe some tuners don't know about MS109 yet? I've been racing for a very long time and just heard about it this year. VP makes too many fuels!!!!!
 
Old Sep 12, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #15  
robmd99's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,597
From: Texas
Rep Power: 205
robmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond reputerobmd99 has a reputation beyond repute
Yes, there seems to be a plethora of fuels.. from As to Qs LOL I am planning on running 2 bars more or less... so I am just trying to get a feel of what fuel I should use?
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 PM.