I heard that RobMD did "close to 230 last year" in the mile . . . Congrats Rob!!!
Apples and oranges. During the mile event (where the 4.81 was recorded), Joe's car was set up for a high speed run, including tires that plainly compromised his 60-130 time (stable tires with less traction). Joe was spinning his tires during the mile run well beyond 60 mph. With stickier tires (e.g., the DRs you used during your epic 60-130 runs), and better traction, Joe will run a much faster 60-130 time. Moreover, a fast 60-130 time requires specific, optimized shifting that is different from a mile run. A 60-130 run requires a specific lead in, at an optomized speed and RPM which cannot be replicated in an all-out mile run. There is little doubt that Joe will run considerably faster than 4.81 when he specifically attempts a 60-130 run, with the right tires, optimized lead in, optimized rpms and optimized shifting. Likewise, I have no doubt that Joe will attempt a 60-130 run shortly and immediately post his results.
Craig
If you want a 60 to 130 you need to specifically run it...
we pulled only a 5.2 out of the 9.9 sec 1/4 run...
best,
mark
we pulled only a 5.2 out of the 9.9 sec 1/4 run...
best,
mark
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







