996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Pump/Meth vs Race Gas/Meth in MY car...

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #1  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Pump/Meth vs Race Gas/Meth in MY car...

We started out to do an AWD vs. RWD comparison, but as it turned out, after a few pulls, we realized my front dif was, and likely has always been, toast. How did we know? We made 3 pulls back to back, removed the drive shaft and made 3 more pulls making sure to duplicate all conditions. The difference between the runs was less than 5 horsepower!!! Kind of explains why I always got stuck in 3 inches of snow last year? Anyway, I always wanted to do a race gas tune, so, we took this opportunity, as the AWD test was spoiled. Since we had removed the drive shaft, we base lined the car on pump gas and meth and RWD. Then we drained all the pump gas and the (100%) meth tank and tuned with MS109 and 50/50 meth/water. (As a side note and from experience, we felt that race gas with 100% meth would greatly impact performance such as spool, so we went with 50/50 as we can’t disable the Aquamist system unless you want to run on waste gate, and I don’t.) We learned that we cannot run pump gas on my race tune, however, my pump gas-100% meth tune is only 20whp and 20wftlbs shy of my MS109 -50/50 tune. This is the case because I cannot get over 1.3-1.35 bar. My waste gates are maxxed out and my boost solenoid duty cycle is at 100%, if not higher. Obviously, we could achieve much better power numbers on race gas with more boost, we just can’t get there, with the parts we have. We could NOT get it to pull timing on the race tune. We kept adding timing, but made no more power. (Yes, we took the timing back out) It did pull 1-2 degrees on the pump tune. We feel that by adding a couple gallons of MS109 with the pump gas would likely get us to the race gas level of power as the timing retard was likely worth the 20hp gain. As of an hour ago, my car is officially RWD for now...

 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #2  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
How much difference were you expecting in power between RWD and AWD?
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #3  
BlackHorseTurbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,301
From: Houston
Rep Power: 607
BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !
Nice, I guess you are going to keep the pump/meth tune as your main tune then? Thanks for the data. This "meth business" sure is interesting. Prolly my next mod.
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #4  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by heavychevy
How much difference were you expecting in power between RWD and AWD?

I expected to see a 25-30whp gain at least going to RWD? Not a HUGE revelation, but our AWD is a hugely overrated...
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:28 PM
  #5  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by BlackHorseTurbo
Nice, I guess you are going to keep the pump/meth tune as your main tune then? Thanks for the data. This "meth business" sure is interesting. Prolly my next mod.
For all intents and purposes, I have no race gas tune...I plan to run my pump gas/meth tune exclusively, and give it a sip of MS109 when I know I am going to "compete". A very small insurance policy...
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #6  
art4iza's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,190
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 276
art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !art4iza Is a GOD !
Good write up Mike and interesting facts. Sorry to hear about the front diff but glad to see you are in RWD mode. I will never go back to AWD
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
BlackHorseTurbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,301
From: Houston
Rep Power: 607
BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !
You really have made the most of your car. Impressive Mike. Can't wait to show you real speed in October. I keed I keed...
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #8  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ttboost
I expected to see a 25-30whp gain at least going to RWD? Not a HUGE revelation, but our AWD is a hugely overrated...

Mine still worked and wouldn't spin the rollers on a (dyno, dynamics) dyno at all. I don't think enough power is being sent to the front to rob much power. Would be nice to know for sure though, I may try it in the near future, but I don't think anyone would get that much rwhp loss. Most of the difference in speed comes from drag and weight.
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #9  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by heavychevy
Mine still worked and wouldn't spin the rollers on a (dyno, dynamics) dyno at all. I don't think enough power is being sent to the front to rob much power. Would be nice to know for sure though, I may try it in the near future, but I don't think anyone would get that much rwhp loss. Most of the difference in speed comes from drag and weight.

We still plan to do it, I just need to get a good Dif. Officially taking donations. If I didn't see that much of an increase, I would NOT have been disappointed. We just know that MY car had a 19% DL loss and most RWD cars are in the 12-15% range. I was just doing napkin math...
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #10  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by BlackHorseTurbo
You really have made the most of your car. Impressive Mike. Can't wait to show you real speed in October. I keed I keed...

Thanks Art and Thanks Todd. I'm just bummed I found this out now. All those trips to the track and all those 60-130's, all done with all that dead weight and parasitic drag...
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 08:57 PM
  #11  
besiktas's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 645
From: Istanbul / Turkey
Rep Power: 43
besiktas is infamous around these partsbesiktas is infamous around these parts
So it's 20whp difference between race-meth vs pump-meth on 1.3 - 1.35 bar and can we say the gap between them should be increased when you crank the boost level up?

For example should the difference be something like 40whp when you run 1,5 - 1,6 bar?
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #12  
BlackHorseTurbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,301
From: Houston
Rep Power: 607
BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !BlackHorseTurbo Is a GOD !
Probably, but he can't "crank up" the boost. He's stuck at 1.35 bar..
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #13  
ttboost's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !ttboost Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by besiktas
So it's 20whp difference between race-meth vs pump-meth on 1.3 - 1.35 bar and can we say the gap between them should be increased when you crank the boost level up?

For example should the difference be something like 40whp when you run 1,5 - 1,6 bar?
ON MY CAR, WITH MY MODS, it's a 20whp difference, yes. I personally don't think the 18G is very efficient over 1.4-1.5 bar, based on what I have seen on MY car at 1.2-1.3 bar, unless you have bigger intercoolers. My Meth kit is awesome and has very noticable gains and provides a level of consistancy I have not seen yet on other cars.
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #14  
MBailey's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,957
From: Texas
Rep Power: 456
MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !MBailey Is a GOD !
Interesting findings Mike...
Sorry about the disappointing hp number for RWD. At least you can loose the 71 lbs and maybe a little drag.
 
Old Sep 1, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #15  
flash68's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,621
From: Norcal
Rep Power: 170
flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !flash68 Is a GOD !
Good stuff Mike! So what were the final numbers?

AWD is for monster trucks anyway....
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.