996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

How many G's??

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
KPV's Avatar
KPV
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,343
From: New Jersey
Rep Power: 199
KPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really niceKPV is just really nice
How many G's??

I recently saw the advertisement for the new Epcot Mission Space ride wherein they put you in a centrifuge and it simulates 2G's during space travel I think. Looks like a really cool ride!
It got me thinking. How many G's does a Stage 4 pull during maximum acceleration?
I would think somebody has one of those G-meter gizmos and can answer this one right away.
Nonetheless, it is pretty funny that I started equating the excitement of accelerating a Stage 4 car with ........an amusement ride!!!
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #2  
ColorChange's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,095
From: Chicago
Rep Power: 146
ColorChange is infamous around these parts
Re: How many G's??

I don't have my system hooked up yet but you would be real lucky to get close to even 1 g in acceleration. .6 or .7 would be my guess.
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:22 PM
  #3  
AMG ETR's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,823
From: DFW, TX
Rep Power: 272
AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !
Hey Ken...
I can tell you in about a week when I pick up a Gtech Pro...according to their website it does acceleration, handleing and braking G's:
http://www.gtechpro.com/gtechprocomp_whatcanitdo.html
Regards,
Evan
PS-I can tell you stage 2 that is, not stage 4 YET
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:32 PM
  #4  
maxiter's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 173
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Rep Power: 29
maxiter is infamous around these parts
I have an early model GTech Pro. ColorChange's guestimate sounds about right. Anybody is welcome to borrow it - it'd probably be happy to get out of the glove box.

FWIW, the original GTech like the one I have, stank. It needed to be placed perfectly level to get good readings. To get lateral G, you had to rotate the unit 90 degrees. Flakey.

My understanding (could be wrong) is that the new GTech doesn't have these issues. Tesla was nice enough to give the new one with multiple accelerometers, so with that, leveling isn't necessary (flashbacks of vectors).
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #5  
AMG ETR's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,823
From: DFW, TX
Rep Power: 272
AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !
Originally posted by maxiter
I have an early model GTech Pro. ColorChange's guestimate sounds about right. Anybody is welcome to borrow it - it'd probably be happy to get out of the glove box.

FWIW, the original GTech like the one I have, stank. It needed to be placed perfectly level to get good readings. To get lateral G, you had to rotate the unit 90 degrees. Flakey.

My understanding (could be wrong) is that the new GTech doesn't have these issues. Tesla was nice enough to give the new one with multiple accelerometers, so with that, leveling isn't necessary (flashbacks of vectors).
So what is your overall opinion of the unit?? Even tho you have the old one, I have never spoke to anyone about it...how accurate do you think the 0-60, 1/4, etc. times are??
Thanks,
Evan
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
HotRodGuy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,873
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Rep Power: 580
HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !HotRodGuy Is a GOD !
all I know is the new one is suppose to be light ages better then the old
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
maxiter's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 173
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Rep Power: 29
maxiter is infamous around these parts
Evan,

I've looked at the specs of the new one, and I'd buy it, even though I wasn't happy with the first generation. The new unit is far more capable and given its multiple accelerometers, won't be subject to the shortcomings of the old unit.

It should be fairly accurate for timing. Since it senses acceleration and measures it over time, in theory it should be able to interpolate speed and distance with a very good degree of accuracy.

Now for it's RWHP estimate, I wouldn't bank on that.

Get one. The price will be more than worth the entertainment.
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 08:46 PM
  #8  
maxiter's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 173
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Rep Power: 29
maxiter is infamous around these parts
Ah... just checking the website.

Get the GTech Pro Competition unit, not the plain-vanilla one (that's the one I have).
 
Old Oct 21, 2003 | 11:39 PM
  #9  
Zippy's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,787
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Rep Power: 209
Zippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond reputeZippy has a reputation beyond repute
The original G-Tech Pro was a steaming piece of crap. Intesting in concept, but so user-unfriendly it only made it out of the glove box once. The NEW G-Tech Pro Competition is a real treat and very easy to use. Not all this getting it perfectly level or inputting a bunch of data every time you want to use it. In fact it can store multiple runs and specific data for up to 4 different vehicles. Data is easily uploaded to 'puter for viewing and compairing *** well as some limited charting capabilities on the large LCD dispay on the unit itself.

Regarding G's on accelleration (better with numbers than letters!) here's a chart of 4 runs with a stock /02 TT. It is critical that the weight be entered in the unit correctly for ALL measurements to be correct. I am using 3595 lbs and am not sure if it's correct or not. So take my results with a grain of salt. (what is the correct number including: aerokit & full carbon fiber interior)

Mike

->Buy this thing!
 
Attached Images  
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 12:05 AM
  #10  
Joe Weinstein's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,439
Rep Power: 87
Joe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to beholdJoe Weinstein is a splendid one to behold
1 G over the 1/4mile = about 9 seconds

For what it's worth, a constant 1 G acceleration over the
1/4 mile from a standing start will take about 9 seconds.
Joe
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 12:12 AM
  #11  
02TT_87GNX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 226
From: CA - Nor Cal
Rep Power: 32
02TT_87GNX is infamous around these parts
I have a Gtech which is about 2 years old, it seems to work quite well. The literature claims +/- .1 sec on acceleration times.

Only used it in the '87 Buick GNX on cold mornings for about a 4.9 sec 0-60, totally stock. The best I could get the TT was 4.6 to sixty.
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 03:18 AM
  #12  
Chris Y.'s Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 532
From: Los Angeles, CA/ Honolulu, HI
Rep Power: 44
Chris Y. is infamous around these parts
I have the G-Tech from Passport and I also can't get good times. I believe mine is slower than actual for some reason.

A friend of mine took it to the track and compared it with his slips...about a second slower even with proper calibration, level surface, actual weight plugged in...not sure.

Looks like folks here are getting slower times too
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 06:07 AM
  #13  
maxiter's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 173
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Rep Power: 29
maxiter is infamous around these parts
Looks like there's some consensus forming that the original unit is steaming crap. Thanks to Zippy for helping illustrate why the Competition unit is 1000x better.
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 07:23 AM
  #14  
Parker's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,361
From: Little Silver, NJ
Rep Power: 77
Parker is infamous around these parts
Ken, HP engineered the Mission: Space ride at Epcot... I 'tested' it out when I was down there (that was during the last 6speedonlin east coast meet in September). One word: rediculous. I'm physically fit and have a strong stomach, but this was a true test. It felt so real it was unbelievable. I was legitimately nauseous.
 
Old Oct 22, 2003 | 07:25 AM
  #15  
AMG ETR's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,823
From: DFW, TX
Rep Power: 272
AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !AMG ETR Is a GOD !
Thanks everyone for opinions on the Gtech Pro Comp. I will be picking one up as soon as I can rap up $250 bux...
Regards,
Evan
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 PM.