996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Hitachi MAF vs OE MAF output?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 06:35 AM
  #1  
sinKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,120
From: Austin
Rep Power: 183
sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !
Hitachi MAF vs OE MAF output?

Does anybody know how the Hitachi MAF sometimes substituted in our car output differs from the Bosch? For example, for any given situation is the MAF outputting .5v less than the Bosch would or does it vary?

If it is a constant decrease throughout the range then I am thinking about a plug and play circuit that would allow me to use the MAF without tuning.

Anybody have the part number for the Hitachi MAF?
 
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
sinKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,120
From: Austin
Rep Power: 183
sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !
Quick research shows the Hitachi outputs a max of 5v and is at .5v with no air passing. I would assume the Bosch also has a voltage, probably .5v but that is just a guess, with no air passing over. From what I understand, and this could be wrong, both have the same maximum output voltage but the Hitachi sees more flow to get to max. If all of these statements are true then my original circuit idea won't work as I had hoped. The ECU calibration would be far easier than the circuit necessary.
 
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
993GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,533
Rep Power: 316
993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !
would replacing the MAF pipe with a larger diameter unit and re-calibrating the tune allow us to see greater flow rates using the same MAF sensor? Assuming no turbulence is created when upsizing the pipe diameter, the accuracy level of the MAF should remain near the same, no?
 
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #4  
sinKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,120
From: Austin
Rep Power: 183
sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 993GT
would replacing the MAF pipe with a larger diameter unit and re-calibrating the tune allow us to see greater flow rates using the same MAF sensor? Assuming no turbulence is created when upsizing the pipe diameter, the accuracy level of the MAF should remain near the same, no?
From my research on MAF's I think you're right. I would be interested to hear what a tuner says.
 
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
Mark @ AIM Performance's Avatar
Basic Sponsor
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,584
From: S.Plainfield, NJ
Rep Power: 856
Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !Mark @ AIM Performance Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 993GT
would replacing the MAF pipe with a larger diameter unit and re-calibrating the tune allow us to see greater flow rates using the same MAF sensor? Assuming no turbulence is created when upsizing the pipe diameter, the accuracy level of the MAF should remain near the same, no?

our MAF pipe is already a pretty large diameter. i have not seen something this big used from a factory before.
 
__________________
#TeamAIM
997TT SilverSpool - 210.8 mph 1/2 Mile WR Apr 2019, 9.2 @ 168 mph 1/4 Mile Manual World Record , 3.15 60-130 mph , 2.72 100-150 mph , 1400whp E85
996TT SpoolBus - 204.6 mph 1/2 Mile 996TT WR Aug 2018, 9.5 @ 154 mph, 3.23 60-130 mph, 2.5 100-150 mph Manual Porsche World Record, 1400whp E85
997TT SlowBerry - 205.0 mph 1/2 Mile WR Nov 2018, 9.7 @ 170 mph 1/4 Mile , 3.2 60-130 mph , 2.4 100-150 mph , 1420whp E85
ESMOTOR | DO88 | TPC DSC | SYVECS | COBB | IPD | KLINE | XONA | AMS | ID | ERP | SACHS | TURBOSMART | CSF | DODSON |
Old Oct 3, 2013 | 05:56 PM
  #6  
993GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,533
Rep Power: 316
993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !
for sure, but there's always bigger, could always just step up a section of the MAF pipe to ~5" too, as long as turbulence isn't created... think it's worth a shot for a tuner to try out
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 03:53 AM
  #7  
timccloud's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,082
From: Australia
Rep Power: 145
timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !timccloud Is a GOD !
Part number is HTC AFH75-01A

Audi number 06 C 133 471 A

If u still wanted it ?
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 05:33 AM
  #8  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 993GT
for sure up but there's always bigger, could always just step up a section of the MAF pipe to ~5" too, as long as turbulence isn't created... think it's worth a shot for a tuner to try out
I believe keeping velocity up in that area is just as important if not more so than making a bigger volume pipe.
Then after that section would the rest of the intake plumbing benefit from it?
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
993GT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,533
Rep Power: 316
993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !
Would probably be a compromise solution, perhaps lacking some sensitivity at idle/very light throttle/flow but gaining the ability to read/not max at very-high power levels...think it's worth looking into for the guys that are having MAF issues and should be pretty easy for anyone with some light-fab skills and a datalogger/tuner to work with
Cheers,
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #10  
Andrew@GIAC's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,479
Rep Power: 0
Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by 993GT
would replacing the MAF pipe with a larger diameter unit and re-calibrating the tune allow us to see greater flow rates using the same MAF sensor? Assuming no turbulence is created when upsizing the pipe diameter, the accuracy level of the MAF should remain near the same, no?
Yes, that is how we typically do it. The Hitachi MAF does offer better drivability, and the larger housing allows for full resolution.
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 12:26 PM
  #11  
johnspeed's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,636
From: chicago
Rep Power: 256
johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !johnspeed Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Thomas@GIAC
Yes, that is how we typically do it. The Hitachi MAF does offer better drivability, and the larger housing allows for full resolution.
But as you said, with the Hitachi one.. Most like because that one can handle/read a bigger volume, lower velocity?
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 01:59 PM
  #12  
Andrew@GIAC's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,479
Rep Power: 0
Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !Andrew@GIAC Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by johnspeed
But as you said, with the Hitachi one.. Most like because that one can handle/read a bigger volume, lower velocity?
Yes, from what I've seen the Hitachi has better resolution than the OEM Bosch.
 
Old Oct 4, 2013 | 02:23 PM
  #13  
sinKing's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
10 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,120
From: Austin
Rep Power: 183
sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !sinKing Is a GOD !
I think the Bosch uses an integrated IAT sensor. Does the Hitachi as well?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLKMGK
996 Turbo / GT2
61
May 31, 2016 04:32 AM
WheelsupZR1
Automobiles For Sale
1
Oct 20, 2015 08:36 PM
ModBargains.com
996 Turbo Vendor Classifieds
0
Oct 1, 2015 11:48 AM
panas001
Automobiles For Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 02:51 PM
bongnation
Automobiles For Sale
9
Sep 25, 2015 02:58 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 PM.