996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

K16 billets - best 'road course' tuner + clutch question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 11-17-2014, 12:28 PM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: la
Posts: 7,971
Rep Power: 601
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Sales@epl
... which k24's are much better at then a SUPER snappy k16/billet !
why, the age old and track proven 16/24's hybrid's with tune and suporting mods of course
 
  #17  
Old 11-17-2014, 11:29 PM
crffl's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17
crffl is a jewel in the roughcrffl is a jewel in the roughcrffl is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by Sales@epl
Its a matter of being able to modulate throttle and control boost with your right foot. This is FAR more easily done on a larger framed turbo.... Some people enjoy "point and shoot" style of driving, but the people that are looking to advance, lower lap times and get faster generally want as much control as possible... For this we recommend a k24 framed turbo over a k16. You are never "waiting" for boost, its more of the idea of being able to apply maintenance throttle through the apex with out getting large spikes in torque.

This is not an off the cuff answer, we have been driving these cars on track since they were new!
You bring up some good points. Boost (torque) that comes one too suddenly and without the ability to smoothly modulate the onset is the enemy of low lap times.

Since I assume the boost limit on 92 octane pump gas is in the 1.1 to 1.3 bar range for straight K24s and K16 billets it would be nice to see some dyno graphs with similar supporting mods and peak boost pressures to get a better idea of how the two turbos might feel on the track. The stock K24s must also operate at a lower P/R vs the K16 billet with the small turbine side
 
  #18  
Old 11-18-2014, 01:39 AM
stevemfr's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: strasbourg, france
Posts: 500
Rep Power: 81
stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !stevemfr Is a GOD !
My comment above was tongue-in-cheek (that's why the smiley was there - sorry if it came across otherwise). A digital throttle is def a negative anywhere - even in a straight line.

That said, there are plenty of K16 based setups that make decent power w/o becoming undriveable due to all torque coming in at 3000 and plenty of K24 based setups that make an early 930 seem lag-free.

After driving both NA (GT3) and various turbos both on and off track, I have all but decided to go with K16s in the first iteration of my street/track car. Who knows. Maybe I'll be calling you for K24s in a years time (though I have to admit - I have already been oogling A28s for the next iteration :-p ).
 
  #19  
Old 11-18-2014, 09:58 PM
crffl's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 17
crffl is a jewel in the roughcrffl is a jewel in the roughcrffl is a jewel in the rough
Originally Posted by stevemfr
My comment above was tongue-in-cheek (that's why the smiley was there - sorry if it came across otherwise). A digital throttle is def a negative anywhere - even in a straight line.

That said, there are plenty of K16 based setups that make decent power w/o becoming undriveable due to all torque coming in at 3000 and plenty of K24 based setups that make an early 930 seem lag-free.

After driving both NA (GT3) and various turbos both on and off track, I have all but decided to go with K16s in the first iteration of my street/track car. Who knows. Maybe I'll be calling you for K24s in a years time (though I have to admit - I have already been oogling A28s for the next iteration :-p ).
stevemfr what configuration are you going to use for your street/track 996TT?
 
  #20  
Old 11-18-2014, 10:14 PM
brockster's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 417
Rep Power: 98
brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !brockster Is a GOD !
Just call Sam! He's as good as it gets in my book! I'm getting set up with a clutch kit gauged to my GIAC tune designed for k16billets as you and I are after the same goal on power etc. I'm going clutch first then turbos.
He will help you understand the options without pressure. I have his info if you need it PM me - most in here do lol.
 
  #21  
Old 11-18-2014, 10:34 PM
993GT's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,533
Rep Power: 314
993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !993GT Is a GOD !
IMHO, for roadcourse use, you generally want a turbo(s) that are slightly oversized compared to a 'street/strip-use' turbo, and not undersized, or the commonly compromised hybrids...want a turbo that flows efficiently for many minutes/hours straight without excessive heat build-up.. hybrids are great for street/1mile/strip/etc. but often the hot-sides are undersized(which gives greater spool) but retain excessive EGT's....VGT turbo are the 'compromise' solution but work in a relatively narrow power-band..
Likewise a street/strip IC/intercooler isn't necessarily a good roadcourse IC, large core(great short-term heat-retention) vs. a truly efficient(heat shedding) core...
A good tuner should be able to guide you...
Cheers,
 
  #22  
Old 11-18-2014, 11:21 PM
SamboTT@ByDesign's Avatar
Former Vendor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 4,901
Rep Power: 0
SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !SamboTT@ByDesign Is a GOD !
Cheers Brock.
I will also add that this all depends on some important factors...The car, driver, goals and budget. One thing may work for one person and not for another and is not always general. There's almost 31 flavors and 32 prices these days as for turbo options. I think the best thing to do is map it all out and deal with someone who you're comfortable with to help get you there.
 
  #23  
Old 11-19-2014, 07:11 AM
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,846
Rep Power: 455
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
I went form RUF K24/26s to K16/997GT2RS turbos. I like the K16s better for track use. Good programming will determine usability of the turbos. Mine feel very much like an NA car, very smooth gradual build up of torque without any boost peaks...
 
  #24  
Old 11-19-2014, 07:26 AM
JR_2's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 0
JR_2 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
I went form RUF K24/26s to K16/997GT2RS turbos. I like the K16s better for track use..
Hello,

Can you explain what modifications were performed to make an "K16/997GT2RS" turbo?

Thanks,
JR
 
  #25  
Old 11-19-2014, 07:46 AM
pwdrhound's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,846
Rep Power: 455
pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !pwdrhound Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by JR_2
Hello,

Can you explain what modifications were performed to make an "K16/997GT2RS" turbo?

Thanks,
JR
K16 housing is modified to accept a 997GT2RS compressor wheel. Turbine inlet housing is ported and the compressor side housing is zero clearenced to the wheel. The compressor inlet is much larger than on a K16 or 24 so a reducer must be used to connect the turbo inlet pipes. Turbos pull strong without let up all the way to 7200rpm.

[url=https://flic.kr/p/pA7m7U]
 

Last edited by pwdrhound; 11-19-2014 at 07:49 AM.
  #26  
Old 11-19-2014, 09:03 AM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: la
Posts: 7,971
Rep Power: 601
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
i've never understood the difference btw the 16/24 "zero clearance" and the older? hybrids i have, as they are excellent and also spool nearly instantaneously and pull strongly up to 7200 without flat spots either.

i guess i'd have to drive a car with those to understand exactly how they are different ( if al all ) in their delivery of boost etc. and if they actually make the car quicker or whatever it is that makes them "better", than 16/24's with the older housing?
 
  #27  
Old 11-19-2014, 09:09 AM
Sales@epl's Avatar
Former Vendor
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 0
Sales@epl is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
I went form RUF K24/26s to K16/997GT2RS turbos. I like the K16s better for track use. Good programming will determine usability of the turbos. Mine feel very much like an NA car, very smooth gradual build up of torque without any boost peaks...
I agree that tuning plays a HUGE roll, but you also need to factor in with a 1 bar wastegate spring (which most upgraded turbo users have), there's very little programming can do below 1 bar to control boost. If you have a slow second gear turn where the car is coming through at 4000+ rpm, there's very little programming is going to be able to do to eliminate some kind of surge in boost when getting back on the gas.
 
  #28  
Old 11-19-2014, 10:06 AM
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ga
Posts: 8,934
Rep Power: 550
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
That's where the right foot takes over the programming. Most drivers don't understand the concept of gradually increasing throttle as more grip becomes available once lateral g's decrease. Gradually squeezing the throttle on exit uses as much power as is needed (or better yet as can be contained by the car and the driver working together).

But that should in theory work as well on a big turbo as a small one considering that you are already in the efficiency range of even the bigger turbo. You aren't foot to floor max power mid corner anyways (assuming not bogging). Feasibly, if you can keep revs in a 4500 range, and begin throttle application early it nullifies the throttle input advantage of the smaller turbo from apex to near trackout. The car will only put down so much power (not near all of it)

I can only think that in super slow corners, like hairpins or sharp off camber turns where you will inevitably leave the optimum rev range, where the smaller turbo would be advantageous. That and the very low end straight line accleration where the smaller turbos should pull harder. But my question remains which will be faster to 60-130 or 60-165 given same car, same power level, bigger turbo or smaller one.

The thing I've found challenging with the big turbo is in fact modulation though, as 2nd gear is useless (too much torque/gear), taking slow, low rev turns in third means you have to plant the foot well early to give that boost time to kick in, but when it does it comes in like a hammer. I'm thinking that will be easier to manage with a smaller turbo as you won't have to anticipate as much.
 
  #29  
Old 11-19-2014, 11:39 AM
996TWINS's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,218
Rep Power: 89
996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute996TWINS has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by pwdrhound
K16 housing is modified to accept a 997GT2RS compressor wheel. Turbine inlet housing is ported and the compressor side housing is zero clearenced to the wheel. The compressor inlet is much larger than on a K16 or 24 so a reducer must be used to connect the turbo inlet pipes. Turbos pull strong without let up all the way to 7200rpm.
Who built the turbos for you?
 
  #30  
Old 11-19-2014, 12:48 PM
'02996ttx50's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: la
Posts: 7,971
Rep Power: 601
'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !'02996ttx50 Is a GOD !
pretty sure those are umw's but im still cant figger out the difference lol
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: K16 billets - best 'road course' tuner + clutch question



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.