Normal Vs X50
Engine wasn't broken in and it was warmer summer day (80s) when it was on the dyno. Now the engine is looser runs well and produces the trap speeds and times quoted. 0-60 with 2 people best of 3.4 to 60. Typical about 3.6. Based on the weight of the car and seemingly always having a passenger it is performing in line with my expectations of the GT640.
I am learly of dyno numbers as the only benchmark of the worth of a modification. The dyno environment suffers from heat soak unless its really frickin cold. There are other issues also but the bottom line for me is the delta and consideration of the conditions at the time of the runs. I wonder how many phone calls tuners get with complaints of not achieving a specific number that is quoted. That part of the business I am sure that they do not enjoy.
I am learly of dyno numbers as the only benchmark of the worth of a modification. The dyno environment suffers from heat soak unless its really frickin cold. There are other issues also but the bottom line for me is the delta and consideration of the conditions at the time of the runs. I wonder how many phone calls tuners get with complaints of not achieving a specific number that is quoted. That part of the business I am sure that they do not enjoy.
Originally Posted by iLLM3
So wait you did the GT640 package and your not even pulling 500 whp?? 

Originally Posted by vincentdds
Martin
I hope you didn't expect 640hp.
I hope you didn't expect 640hp.

Im not stupid, but i figured it would pull in the upper 500 crank hp and torque numbers which would be 500 whp and some!
Originally Posted by Fanman
First, if it is an AWD dyno you should take off at least a 25% correction factor. Second he did a Mustang Dyno, which even if he disengaged the front wheels, those dynos are notorious for putting out much lower #'s than a dynomometer/dyno dynamax (standard dyno).
Originally Posted by 95RogueM3
Yes, and the GT2 intercoolers.
i.e. did they install what the X50 turbo had on the GT2..
or did they install what the GT2 had on a turbo, resulting in the X50 package
i guess the DIRECT question would be:
are there any '00 (first year production) X50 turbos?
Originally Posted by Mowateriology
okay, so the question is.. are there any X50 turbos before the GT2 was launched?
i.e. did they install what the X50 turbo had on the GT2..
or did they install what the GT2 had on a turbo, resulting in the X50 package
i guess the DIRECT question would be:
are there any '00 (first year production) X50 turbos?
i.e. did they install what the X50 turbo had on the GT2..
or did they install what the GT2 had on a turbo, resulting in the X50 package
i guess the DIRECT question would be:
are there any '00 (first year production) X50 turbos?
Last edited by iLLM3; Feb 4, 2006 at 01:36 PM.
Originally Posted by Mowateriology
iLLM3
you never know, so might as well ask and get it over with !!
thanks though, that's what i expected
first X50 turbos were the 2002s .. great
you never know, so might as well ask and get it over with !!
thanks though, that's what i expected

first X50 turbos were the 2002s .. great
NP
Alright - Now I'm losing it
Help me complete/correct the following - Assuming '02 or later 996
Stock Turbo - AWD - 415hp - k16
w/X50 Package (a factory option???) - AWD - 444hp - k24
TurboS - AWD - 460hp - ????
GT2 - RWD - ???hp - k24
Help me complete/correct the following - Assuming '02 or later 996
Stock Turbo - AWD - 415hp - k16
w/X50 Package (a factory option???) - AWD - 444hp - k24
TurboS - AWD - 460hp - ????
GT2 - RWD - ???hp - k24





