6speedonline's official 60-130, 1/4 Mile, and Standing Mile list
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Guys,
Mike (TTboost) ran a very quick 6.24 with 1-shift on a 2.28% decline in his AWD car on pump gas with meth injection.
He also ran a very solid 11.54 @ 129.4 1/4 mile with a 2.02 short time.
Great job, Mike!!
Mike (TTboost) ran a very quick 6.24 with 1-shift on a 2.28% decline in his AWD car on pump gas with meth injection.
He also ran a very solid 11.54 @ 129.4 1/4 mile with a 2.02 short time.
Great job, Mike!!
Congrats.
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 784
From: Colombia
Rep Power: 66
I went just for kicks last weekend to the 1/4 mile event here , and on low boost 1,1 with pump gas and not the best start I got 11,6 @ 140.6 (track ticket said that) (we are @ 8500 ft above sea level)
Will learn how to use the Pbox to try and get some times....
Will learn how to use the Pbox to try and get some times....
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
Thanks Scott and everyone else! I probably could do a little better at the track, but I'm not interested in breaking any axles. I basically let the clutch out and stomped on it. The car ran flawless, as usual, in less than optimum weather.
It was my goal all along to try to maximize the 18G's on PUMP gas and try to build a 600whp pump gas car and with Tony's help, I think we're there. Well, close enough for me, for now.
It was my goal all along to try to maximize the 18G's on PUMP gas and try to build a 600whp pump gas car and with Tony's help, I think we're there. Well, close enough for me, for now.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,190
From: L.A.
Rep Power: 276
I assume you did not go with HSF if it's 100% Meth. Were you guys able to look at the dyno at that boost with and without Meth, just curious. Also interested to know the intake temp. variance. Great results!
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,453
From: CT
Rep Power: 439
Thanks Todd. Yeah I think it works VERY well. I noticed a HUGE improvement in top end as it helps carry the power out farther. I used to run out, now I have an additional 35whp after 6k or so.
Yeah Art, I used the Aquamist HSF-1 kit. Installed it myself, about 6-8hrs or so. Tony documented all the dyno data here...
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ow-soon-4.html
Yeah Art, I used the Aquamist HSF-1 kit. Installed it myself, about 6-8hrs or so. Tony documented all the dyno data here...
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ow-soon-4.html
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 239
From: close to the Nordschleife
Rep Power: 28
3.53 sec. 60-130 for the TT Gallardo... Almost 1.5G's of longitudinal acceleration... 
A few things of note...there were 2 shifts during the run, the 3-4 shift cost about 2 tenths, or more... I bet this car would have run a 3.3 or faster had he rung out 3rd gear another 100 rpm or so. Also, in 3rd gear it was making almost 1.2G's...simply nuts. Lastly, if you go back and look at the 3-4 shift, you can see that by the time he hit 130, the car hadn't even recovered from the shift as the G's were still rising. This car still has 100 rwhp left on the table, with speed dependant boost, a bit more power and no shift from 3-4, it could run in the 2's......
A few things of note...there were 2 shifts during the run, the 3-4 shift cost about 2 tenths, or more... I bet this car would have run a 3.3 or faster had he rung out 3rd gear another 100 rpm or so. Also, in 3rd gear it was making almost 1.2G's...simply nuts. Lastly, if you go back and look at the 3-4 shift, you can see that by the time he hit 130, the car hadn't even recovered from the shift as the G's were still rising. This car still has 100 rwhp left on the table, with speed dependant boost, a bit more power and no shift from 3-4, it could run in the 2's......
great performance and sound!