Stage IV
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I'm not missing anything. My point was, my 510 rated HP car goes just like a claimed 590+ HP 'under-rated' RUF). So who's over-rated in that scnenario? I'd say the RUF.
If a car makes 600 hp, it makes 600 HP. If RUF claims 550, and turns a time similar to other 550 HP cars...that's exactly how much power it's making, regardless of dyno#'s.
[b]How about this; since you're the one making the claim...prove to me that the majority of Euro tuned cars are verifiably faster than US tuned cars of the same rated HP.
I'll pit my claimed 700 HP US tuned car against *any* 700 HP claimed Euro tuned car.
If a car makes 600 hp, it makes 600 HP. If RUF claims 550, and turns a time similar to other 550 HP cars...that's exactly how much power it's making, regardless of dyno#'s.
[b]How about this; since you're the one making the claim...prove to me that the majority of Euro tuned cars are verifiably faster than US tuned cars of the same rated HP.
I'll pit my claimed 700 HP US tuned car against *any* 700 HP claimed Euro tuned car.
I do not say that US cars are slower, i say that the cars produce the same Hp just that the messureing are diffrent...
Originally Posted by Hamann7
Considering that Guy's Nardo RGT-2 can outrun a modified SL65, I am sure it can do better than 11.5 @ 126.5
You guys really underestimate how great Ruf and RS Tuning are. Euro numbers are more conservative because they use a MAHA or engine dyno, which is far more accurate than a DynoJet. Also, in order to achieve TUV certification, each tuning package has to meet stringent requirements to achieve its claimed power figures.
Just some food for thought. If you have the money, choosing between Ruf and the mainstream US packages is a no-brainer. You definitely get what you pay for.
You guys really underestimate how great Ruf and RS Tuning are. Euro numbers are more conservative because they use a MAHA or engine dyno, which is far more accurate than a DynoJet. Also, in order to achieve TUV certification, each tuning package has to meet stringent requirements to achieve its claimed power figures.
Just some food for thought. If you have the money, choosing between Ruf and the mainstream US packages is a no-brainer. You definitely get what you pay for.
Take the RT-12. It's claimed to be making 650 HP. But since the argument is that RUF is under-rated...let's say it's making an actual 700 HP. It was RWD and it ran 11.0 @ 133.9. Why is not trapping as high as my claimed 700 HP car? Which hit 10.6 @ 135.4, 10.6 @ 135.5, and 10.8 @ 136 in the 3 runs I completed at the track? My car only dynoed 570 and 600 rwhp...so its right at 700 crank HP.
The RUF is trapping right where it should be for a RWD, 650 HP car. I personally don't think it's making 700 HP.
As a matter of fact, there is a EVO GT700 GT2, EVOMS GT700 TT, and a Imagine Auto 700HP GT2 that *all* trapped higher than the RUF? How does this show the US cars being over-rated at all?
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Aug 15, 2006 at 09:35 AM.
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I'm not missing anything. My point was, my 510 rated HP car goes just like a claimed 590+ HP 'under-rated' RUF). So who's over-rated in that scnenario? I'd say the RUF.
If a car makes 600 hp, it makes 600 HP. If RUF claims 550, and turns a time similar to other 550 HP cars...that's exactly how much power it's making, regardless of dyno#'s.
[b]How about this; since you're the one making the claim...prove to me that the majority of Euro tuned cars are verifiably faster than US tuned cars of the same rated HP.
I'll pit my claimed 700 HP US tuned car against *any* 700 HP claimed Euro tuned car.
If a car makes 600 hp, it makes 600 HP. If RUF claims 550, and turns a time similar to other 550 HP cars...that's exactly how much power it's making, regardless of dyno#'s.
[b]How about this; since you're the one making the claim...prove to me that the majority of Euro tuned cars are verifiably faster than US tuned cars of the same rated HP.
I'll pit my claimed 700 HP US tuned car against *any* 700 HP claimed Euro tuned car.
Not only would you lose a drag race, it would lap you around almost any race track.

You also forget that Todd K. uses an engine dyno... so his numbers are far more accurate than his "competitors" in the States. He is the one exception to the US tuner BS.
By the way, if YOU drove the RT12, I bet you would get 10 second timeslips. It's hard to say without having the same driver under the same conditions. I also bet the Ruf car would start to pull on a GT700 car above 125mph all the way to 210mph+ That's just the way those cars are...
For the race track, the Ruf powerband is much more usable and smoother than most US packages.
Look a the CTR Yellowbird... even though it's quarter mile is not that impressive, I bet it'll get to over 200mph faster than even your car! Well, it would be pretty close.
Last edited by Hamann7; Aug 15, 2006 at 04:31 AM.
Originally Posted by SMR
And you did it again
I do not say that US cars are slower, i say that the cars produce the same Hp just that the messureing are diffrent...
I do not say that US cars are slower, i say that the cars produce the same Hp just that the messureing are diffrent...
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Aug 15, 2006 at 09:36 AM.
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I'v already showed examples of RUF cars that are not making more power than claim. The RUF 590 trapping 126 (where it should), and the RWD RUF RT-12 trapping 133.9 (where it should).
Originally Posted by Hamann7
As much as I like Todd Knighton's work... you would get your *** handed to you by the Jurgen Alzen 996TT done by RS Tuning. That is a real 700hp... Hey, you did say ANY!!!
Not only would you lose a drag race, it would lap you around almost any race track.
Not only would you lose a drag race, it would lap you around almost any race track.

You also forget that Todd K. uses an engine dyno... so his numbers are far more accurate than his "competitors" in the States. He is the one exception to the US tuner BS.
By the way, if YOU drove the RT12, I bet you would get 10 second timeslips. I also bet the Ruf car would start to pull on a GT700 car above 125mph all the way to 210mph+
Look a the CTR Yellowbird... even though it's quarter mile is not that impressive, I bet it'll get to over 200mph faster than even your car!
Look a the CTR Yellowbird... even though it's quarter mile is not that impressive, I bet it'll get to over 200mph faster than even your car!
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Aug 15, 2006 at 09:37 AM.
Originally Posted by Hamann7
That doesn't make sense to me. A stock GT2 traps about 120 with only 456hp... so 134hp only increases your trap by 6mph... seems low.
Looking at a stock GT2 to GT700 GT2, it's a 244 HP increase...and I've read about GT2's hitting 122 stock. 244 HP for a 12 mph increase is about right.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Aug 15, 2006 at 04:45 AM.
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I'v already showed examples of RUF cars that are not making more power than claim. The RUF 590 trapping 126 (where it should), and the RWD RUF RT-12 trapping 133.9 (where it should).
Originally Posted by SMR
And where have i said that the US cars are underpowerd, i think you are missing my point, and i do not know how to explain what i mean..

Originally Posted by Hamann7
By the way, if YOU drove the RT12, I bet you would get 10 second timeslips. It's hard to say without having the same driver under the same conditions. I also bet the Ruf car would start to pull on a GT700 car above 125mph all the way to 210mph+ That's just the way those cars are...
For the race track, the Ruf powerband is much more usable and smoother than most US packages.
Originally Posted by RennTechV12
Have you ever driven a GT700? If you had, I think that you would realize that the powerband is EXTREMELY usable, due to the quick spooling turbos and mind numbing acceleration. On a power usabilty scale of 1 to 10, with the N/A CGT being a 1, the GT700 is a 2.5. Ask GRussell to drive his after he gets his kit done, I bet you'll change your mind

From what I was told, RS tuning tunes each car individually.. they put it thru many dyno hours b4 its taken by the customer. Its probably tuned specific... unlike the US counterparts that make a tuning package via a third party tuner... So I would expect the custom tuned cars like the ones by RS tuning and or RUF.. as well as Scotts to be faster.... and from the look of time slips Scott is faster at the track then any US tuner (on a stock motor). Why, because it was built and tuned from ground up. Now, Im not taking anything away form other tuners.. its just thats the way they choose to tune and offer such product. What is unique is that scotts car dynod at least 40rwhp and 40rwTQ LESS then any other "stock motor" tuning package offered by other( US) tuners and he still trapped 135 mph- just like they did... but they had considerably more Dyno power. My point is that dyno figures tell a story but not the whole story... Like Scott said, trap speeds are a great way of proving HP...
Im only using a comparison between Scotts car and other tuners to prove a point and not to instigate a war between Tuner packages...
Markski
Im only using a comparison between Scotts car and other tuners to prove a point and not to instigate a war between Tuner packages...
Markski
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
From what I was told, RS tuning tunes each car individually.. they put it thru many dyno hours b4 its taken by the customer. Its probably tuned specific... unlike the US counterparts that make a tuning package via a third party tuner... So I would expect the custom tuned cars like the ones by RS tuning and or RUF.. as well as Scotts to be faster.... and from the look of time slips Scott is faster at the track then any US tuner (on a stock motor). Why, because it was built and tuned from ground up. Now, Im not taking anything away form other tuners.. its just thats the way they choose to tune and offer such product. What is unique is that scotts car dynod at least 40rwhp and 40rwTQ LESS then any other "stock motor" tuning package offered by other( US) tuners and he still trapped 135 mph- just like they did... but they had considerably more Dyno power. My point is that dyno figures tell a story but not the whole story... Like Scott said, trap speeds are a great way of proving HP...
Im only using a comparison between Scotts car and other tuners to prove a point and not to instigate a war between Tuner packages...
Markski
Im only using a comparison between Scotts car and other tuners to prove a point and not to instigate a war between Tuner packages...
Markski
j/k
Remember that atmospheric conditions can account for as much as 3-5mph in trapspeed for cars of equal power. Not to take anything away from Scott's machine, which is the stock motor drag race champ, but the conditions at the tracks the he runs at are more favorable than the conditions here in AZ
I would love to have all the 996 guys meet up at the same track, same time and run together. That would really be the only true way to measure power on an equal playing field (hmmm...thinking about planning a 6speed drag day somewhere this fall)
I Know JOE... u guys are running in crazy HEAT... either way I think there is a benefit to having a custom tuned car...I do not know what temps Scott ran in... but I tend to believe it was cooler... its hard to really make accurate comparisons... too many variables... I guess when it cools down for u guys then maybe we can get some real numbers.... we here in Chicago get into the 90s... but we have lots of humidity due to the lake... 
markski
PS. I think a drag shootout would be cool... but only customer cars... custom and or other built.. but leave the tuner cars on the lift. I dont think its fair for any one of us to run against a tuner car that sets up/tunes a car for a specific event... we as customers do not have that ability.
unless its a tuner event then thats a totally different game.

markski
PS. I think a drag shootout would be cool... but only customer cars... custom and or other built.. but leave the tuner cars on the lift. I dont think its fair for any one of us to run against a tuner car that sets up/tunes a car for a specific event... we as customers do not have that ability.
unless its a tuner event then thats a totally different game.
__________________

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL

2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Last edited by markski@markskituning; Aug 15, 2006 at 01:50 PM.







