New M5?
#4
Originally posted by Ruiner
Chris Bangle has taken BMW and turned it into Pontiac.
Chris Bangle has taken BMW and turned it into Pontiac.
Dario
#5
The design of the new 5 series is a definite step backwards. I would love a 500-550 hp V10 M5, but I don't think I would buy it no matter how much engine it has based on the poor styling of this car. I will probably look at the E55 far more. I would be surprised if it was 500 hp. Given that many of the E55's are dynoing out at 440 whp, and their phenomenal 1/4 mi. times, I would thing if BMW wants to keep that sedan supercar crown they would need 550 hp for this car.
#6
Be careful what you say, as it sometimes comes back to haunt you. Personally, i didn't care that much for the E39 5-series when it arrived in 1997. After a few years of looking at it's rounded shapes it began to grow on me. Certainly the M touches finished it off and I got one in 2000. After seeing the new 5 in person, i don't hate it and predict it's styling will grow on me as before. If I end up with an M5 again, it won't be the first year and definately not with a new engine to boot. Stay away from a first year BMW. I'm sure it will be quite a performer though.
#7
Originally posted by Fanman
The design of the new 5 series is a definite step backwards. I would love a 500-550 hp V10 M5, but I don't think I would buy it no matter how much engine it has based on the poor styling of this car.
The design of the new 5 series is a definite step backwards. I would love a 500-550 hp V10 M5, but I don't think I would buy it no matter how much engine it has based on the poor styling of this car.
Trending Topics
#8
M5-Fugly?
Fugly? Yea,maybe! I am down for early delivery. Unless I am totally in love with performance, I will flip it! If I am in love I will worry about "first year blues" after I get the car.
R
PS
My personal definition of performance requirements has nothing to do with 0-60 times.
R
PS
My personal definition of performance requirements has nothing to do with 0-60 times.