Racing a modded wrx tonight
Originally Posted by vincentdds
So did the race ever took place. Or is this thread becoming "who got bigger *****" thread.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by MexicoBlue
Yeah, I would hate to involve driver input and skill in an auto race! Can't we just show our receipts, or dyno slips, and whoever spent the most on their car wins . . . ???
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by 9Eleven
We don't think that. Some guy comes on and starts claiming crazy trap speeds and quarter mile times and he was debunked. If you make a claim, you better make sure that it's accurate or else we are going to call your bluff. Don't bring B.S. to this forum, it insults our intelligence.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by phillym5
Yes..Yes..Yes..
Please continue......wait...... let me get a snack.................ok, let the tussle continue.
Taza... always starting **** for no reason.
I think YOU think you are invincible.
Please continue......wait...... let me get a snack.................ok, let the tussle continue.
Taza... always starting **** for no reason.
I think YOU think you are invincible.
Martin, honestly i wouldnt be laughing. Your the only guy i know that can accurately rate car's acceleration just by sitting in them.
No.
P.S. How do you only manage 123mph trap with 650hp??
P.S. How do you only manage 123mph trap with 650hp??
123 mph trap speed at a track like that is good. Besides i had no traction up top and was not using Nitrous (503rwhp). Like i said before, stage 2 996tt with race gas/race mode ran a 115mph trap there.
Best to stick to dyno sheets.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,725
From: Delawhere?
Rep Power: 230
Originally Posted by SCM3
Nope its not quick. Especially not on a street car at a sandy/windy 5000 foot density altitude one.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by Gramicci101
5000 ft altitude? Where was this? It sure wasn't at LACR, because that's only 2710 ft.
you guys are getting all technical on me.... here in Chicago, its super hot in the 90s and insane humidity.... we run anyway.... yes its only 600 ft above sea level...
If you want two tenths just go on a colder day... at least thats how it works here....
I ran my fastest TT time in 94 degrees @ 5 pm hot lapping.. go figure...
If you want two tenths just go on a colder day... at least thats how it works here....
I ran my fastest TT time in 94 degrees @ 5 pm hot lapping.. go figure...
__________________
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
2001 996TT 3.6L and stock ECU
9.66 seconds @ 147.76 mph 1/4 mile click to view
160 mph @ 9.77 seconds in 1/4 mile click to view
50% OFF ON PORSCHE ECU TUNING BLACK FRIDAY SPECIAL
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by MARKSKI
you guys are getting all technical on me.... here in Chicago, its super hot in the 90s and insane humidity.... we run anyway.... yes its only 600 ft above sea level...
If you want two tenths just go on a colder day... at least thats how it works here....
I ran my fastest TT time in 94 degrees @ 5 pm hot lapping.. go figure...
If you want two tenths just go on a colder day... at least thats how it works here....
I ran my fastest TT time in 94 degrees @ 5 pm hot lapping.. go figure...
I feel ya, but 600ft above sea level is pretty great compared to 2700 feet. If you watch my 1/4 video you will luagh b/c you can see/hear me lose traction in 3rd/4th because of sand on the track (ya thats how bad this track is). On that run it was in the 90's, with a 15mph tailwind. Wish we had a decent track....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpg5WT-J3Ug
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by MexicoBlue
SCM3 - I was just reading your sig line. Your car currently has 650hp, and you're gonna double that? Wow. I'm no math major, but that seems like a lot of power . . .
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 679
From: Mi, SoCal
Rep Power: 57
Originally Posted by SCM3
Yup the car is getting completely redone a different way,the goal is to get close to doubling it. Although i will be happy with anything over 800whp.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,073
From: Minneapolis, Mn
Rep Power: 1071
Originally Posted by phillym5
You better mini tub that thing.....
M3 dude. You must be huffing some of the NAWS that is supposed to go into your engine.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 715
From: SoCal
Rep Power: 52
Originally Posted by LUIS95993
Why?, it will be a perfect track car.
M3 dude. You must be huffing some of the NAWS that is supposed to go into your engine.
M3 dude. You must be huffing some of the NAWS that is supposed to go into your engine.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Vik (SCM3),
I'm getting extremely tired of seeing you come on this forum with your consistently negative, know-it-all attitude, just to start crap with other members. No one here cares about your blown M3 or your lackluster 1/4 mile times.
The fact is; you're one-step away from getting banned from this forum, just like you did on M3forum.
I'm giving you fair warning in public, so don't complain if/when it happens.
I'm getting extremely tired of seeing you come on this forum with your consistently negative, know-it-all attitude, just to start crap with other members. No one here cares about your blown M3 or your lackluster 1/4 mile times.
The fact is; you're one-step away from getting banned from this forum, just like you did on M3forum.
I'm giving you fair warning in public, so don't complain if/when it happens.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Oct 15, 2006 at 01:15 PM.