EVO 3.6 SC vs stock 996TT - Page 4 - 6SpeedOnline - Porsche Forum and Luxury Car Resource

Mar 3, 2007 | 04:18 PM

#46

Divexxtreme

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by deputydog95

i'm just f'ing with you. I know you're making Todd at protomotive's mortgage payments for the next six months or so

It's a 600hp protomotive car, which translates into a stage 4 by most tuners.

To be more specific.... hybrid turbos, exhaust, diverter valves, wastegate springs, boost controller, evo intercoolers, upgraded intercooler hoses, blah blah blah.

Ahh, gotcha. Thanks.

FWIW...I'm not anti-SC at all. I bet the SC 996's really rip while still maintaining a N/A feel. I like SC's. Had one on my E46 M3.

P.S. - I accidentally edited your post when I thought I wax replying to it.

Sorry about that.

Mar 3, 2007 | 04:19 PM

#47

Divexxtreme

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 8,509

From: Virginia, USA

Rep Power: 789

Quote:

Originally Posted by deputydog95

what's a stock X50TT running?

One of the mags ran 11.8X @ 120 in one.

Mar 3, 2007 | 04:20 PM

#48

MexicoBlue

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 4,300

From: Arkansas

Rep Power: 250

Quote:

Originally Posted by ringmaster

Apples to oranges and salami to hotdogs! A supercharged 997 might be faster than a stock 996TT but not a supercharged 996 and I believe since this is a 996 forum the OP was asking about his 996 C4S.

You have made three or four very confident, decisive posts on here about how a 996tt will beat a 996SC, particularly above 60mph, with no apparent backup for your claims at all. Any basis for these comments? Just wondering.

People usually indicate either how they know this, or that they are just guessing, yet interestingly enough, you have done neither . . .

Last edited by MexicoBlue; Mar 3, 2007 at 04:25 PM.