996 Turbo / GT2 Turbo discussion on previous model 2000-2005 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo and 911 GT2.

Speedometer VS. GPS Speed !!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #1  
black996tt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
From: Houma
Rep Power: 0
black996tt is infamous around these parts
Speedometer VS. GPS Speed !!!!!!!

The entire cluster on my car was changed under warranty. I attached a couple of different Garmin GPS units to the front windshield. I wanted to test how good was the calibration on the new cluster. I placed the car on cruise control at 70MPH and both GPS units were reading 5 to 6 MPH (slower) Speed than the one on the speedometer. So the GPS units were reading between 64 to 65 MPH. Is that acceptable or they need to calibrate the speedo a bit better????

Thanks


Black996TT
2004
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #2  
Jean's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,163
From: Earth
Rep Power: 91
Jean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond reputeJean has a reputation beyond repute
Black 996TT, 10% is unacceptable, assuming the Garmin is a fast enough GPS. Are you on stock tire sizes?
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
ebaker's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 910
From: TX, USA
Rep Power: 59
ebaker is infamous around these parts
From what I've read most read 4-5 mph fast from 35mph up.
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #4  
black996tt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
From: Houma
Rep Power: 0
black996tt is infamous around these parts
I googled it and +/- 3% is acceptable. Like Jean said, 10% is too much. Yes Jean, stock tire sizes.
Going back to the dealer for proper calibration on Monday.
Thanks

Black996TT
 

Last edited by black996tt; May 12, 2007 at 10:12 PM.
Old May 12, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
Turbo Fanatic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,880
From: In a Canyon - Really :)
Rep Power: 290
Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !
That's funny, just got a class action letter stating that Honda/Acura had settled a lawsuit by giving slightly extended warranties and lease mileage credits for most of their cars.

The point was that the speedometer/odometers were off by more than 5% basically costing lessees over mileage charges and letting Honda off warranty claims that much sooner.

at 10% error, If you drove your car 90K miles, it would say 99K miles on the odometer.... not cool.
 
Old May 13, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #6  
jimq's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
From: Altamonte Springs, Florida
Rep Power: 24
jimq is infamous around these parts
my GPS reads 2mph lower then the cluster at 70. I tested it with both my Garmin and Magellan. My 964 is dead on at 70 as is my Dodge truck.
 
Old May 13, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #7  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
My GPS is almost dead on up to 165 (on track) IF I had time to stare at it while on the brakes heading into a turn I would know for sure, but I would say no more than 2-3 mph off.
 
Old May 13, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #8  
Turbo Fanatic's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,880
From: In a Canyon - Really :)
Rep Power: 290
Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !Turbo Fanatic Is a GOD !
Are you kidding. My car has been RWD for 18 months. It's faster and has better steering feel. BTW All I did was remove the front driveshaft.
 
Old May 13, 2007 | 09:03 AM
  #9  
heavychevy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,930
From: ga
Rep Power: 552
heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !heavychevy Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by ari
Are you kidding. My car has been RWD for 18 months. It's faster and has better steering feel. BTW All I did was remove the front driveshaft.
No not kidding, I am the ANTI-RWD from here on out, my car got slower. Yeah turn in is better but that's it, then it becomes unbearable oversteer and with a rear engine car oversteer is not your friend.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Texas1
Automobiles For Sale
6
Sep 20, 2015 09:12 AM
proTUNING Freaks
997 Turbo / GT2
17
Sep 15, 2015 07:28 AM
Suds26
997
1
Sep 2, 2015 01:33 PM
MC36
Southeast
0
Sep 1, 2015 06:39 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.