NEW: 60 to 130 mph
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,726
From: Michigan
Rep Power: 416
Originally Posted by Jean
I think you did great in this latest post, good job. :
: lol!
BTW , what a tough guy you are!! When I grow up I wanna be just like you.
: lol!BTW , what a tough guy you are!! When I grow up I wanna be just like you.
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
One *very* lazy shift. His one shift on that run took as much time as two of mine. Seriously. His car at low boost (1,200 rwhp) with a fast shift would be a 4.2 car, no problem. At high-boost (1,500 rwhp)...it'd hit 3's.
Not sure if was 4.6 flat. They just said "4.6".
Not sure if was 4.6 flat. They just said "4.6".
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Originally Posted by MrBlonde
And he didn't run high boost becuase ... ?
Looks like he was running high-boost in the below video, however:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=0
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Originally Posted by Jean
If I see a run that shows underwater altitude, and tweaky speed line and weird shifts and long Gs, I say so, and I assume that the run might have a problem, if you don't like it, tough luck.
This has nothing to do with Scott, unless he chooses to take it personally.
This has nothing to do with Scott, unless he chooses to take it personally.
As far as the "tweaky speed line and long G's"...I had traction issues in each gear, and also shift quicker than most. But I'm complimented to find out that my driving ability is such that it confuses those who try to over-analyze the graphs.
Finally, let's not forget that my car weighs a hefty 3,550 lbs with me in it, and I made that 4.9 run going uphill. Most everyone else is going downhill.
No reason to hate, Jean. Your car is still fast.
Last edited by Divexxtreme; Jul 12, 2007 at 07:36 PM.
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Couldn't tell you. You'll have to ask him yourself.
Looks like he was running high-boost in the below video, however:
Looks like he was running high-boost in the below video, however:
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,163
From: Earth
Rep Power: 91
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
I don't take it personally at all. I am 100' above sea level here where I live, but if the freeway I was on is lower than that...there's not much I can do to change it.
As far as the "tweaky speed line and long G's"...I had traction issues in each gear, and also shift quicker than most. But I'm complimented to find out that my driving ability is such that it confuses those who try to over-analyze the graphs.
Finally, let's not forget that my car weighs a hefty 3,550 lbs with me in it, and I made that 4.9 run going uphill. Most everyone else is going downhill.
No reason to hate, Jean. Your car is still fast.
As far as the "tweaky speed line and long G's"...I had traction issues in each gear, and also shift quicker than most. But I'm complimented to find out that my driving ability is such that it confuses those who try to over-analyze the graphs.
Finally, let's not forget that my car weighs a hefty 3,550 lbs with me in it, and I made that 4.9 run going uphill. Most everyone else is going downhill.
No reason to hate, Jean. Your car is still fast.
Only to answer some of your comments .
I don't have the raw data so I did not over-analyze
, it is all in the graph you posted. The lowest point in "Mexico" geography were the runs were made and on the East Coast is zero feet, by the Atlantic, yet the logger is showing negative -125 feet. Your second shift took a slow 0.5 seconds, yet the car kept gaining speed/accelerating at 0.3Gs while you were not in gear.
To anyone seeing the altitude and G data during shifts, it is normal to consider the likelihood of a problem with the data or signal maybe.
Your 5.1-5.2 second (from memory) run was good though, 2 tenths is not a big deal..
No hate at all, just an opinion.
Afterall your car is fast too.
Awaiting Email Confirmation
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 611
From: Sydney, Australia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Jean
Scott,
Only to answer some of your comments .
I don't have the raw data so I did not over-analyze , it is all in the graph you posted. The lowest point in "Mexico" geography were the runs were made and on the East Coast is zero feet, by the Atlantic, yet the logger is showing negative -125 feet.
Your second shift took a slow 0.5 seconds, yet the car kept gaining speed/accelerating at 0.3Gs while you were not in gear.
To anyone seeing the altitude and G data during shifts, it is normal to consider the likelihood of a problem with the data or signal maybe.
Your 5.1-5.2 second (from memory) run was good though, 2 tenths is not a big deal..
No hate at all, just an opinion.
Afterall your car is fast too.
Only to answer some of your comments .
I don't have the raw data so I did not over-analyze
, it is all in the graph you posted. The lowest point in "Mexico" geography were the runs were made and on the East Coast is zero feet, by the Atlantic, yet the logger is showing negative -125 feet. Your second shift took a slow 0.5 seconds, yet the car kept gaining speed/accelerating at 0.3Gs while you were not in gear.
To anyone seeing the altitude and G data during shifts, it is normal to consider the likelihood of a problem with the data or signal maybe.
Your 5.1-5.2 second (from memory) run was good though, 2 tenths is not a big deal..
No hate at all, just an opinion.
Afterall your car is fast too.
I respect your opinion very much, but would have to state here that there is no way on this Earth that Scott would misrepresent or "cheat" on a run, no way at all.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,163
From: Earth
Rep Power: 91
Mr. Blonde, I would never even consider that, I know Scott well enough to know where his values are, and he knows I would never question them. There is no need to get personal on this stuff, I am only reading data.
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,710
From: MPLS, MN USA
Rep Power: 466
KPG, Scott, Jean, Mr. Blonde; all:
I respect Jean for bringing up the point, I dont have the technical
knowledge to question someone elses run. Give Jean and anyone that
questions something (with intelligence), the courtesy of not having
to personally attack.
Best,
Marty K.
soon to log a 0-300 kph...
I respect Jean for bringing up the point, I dont have the technical
knowledge to question someone elses run. Give Jean and anyone that
questions something (with intelligence), the courtesy of not having
to personally attack.
Best,
Marty K.
soon to log a 0-300 kph...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Josh/AWE
991 Turbo
30
Apr 2, 2020 05:38 PM
