Fun for your 3.6L Supercharged Guys!
Fun for your 3.6L Supercharged Guys!
I always knew the 3.6L cars were quick with the EVO Super Charger on them but I'm suprised as to how fast in real life... I spoke to Todd@EVO over the weekend and he himself (trust me he's no drag racer!) took his 3.6L 997 Super Charged car to a local Arizona drag strip (bear in mind the alitutude stunts mph and times considerably) and the car did a 12.1 @ 119. Very impressive numbers indeed. Considering he was driving and that it was in Arizona (the launches weren't super hard either so there's room for imrovement) at altitude I think it's safe to say that car really can go 11s!
http://www.evoms.com/997%20sc%20page.htm
http://www.evoms.com/997%20sc%20page.htm
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,000
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 108
Finally! That's the number most of us have been waiting to hear ever since we first heard about the SC development project.
Great trap speed.
For real bragging rights, give the car to an experienced drag racer, kiss goodbye to the clutch, and see what she'll do when driven hard.
I'd guess a copy of the timeslip from one mid-high 11 second pass would boost sales tremendously.
(hee hee. Geddit? 'boost sales'. Sometimes I'm so sharp, I cut myself)
Great trap speed.
For real bragging rights, give the car to an experienced drag racer, kiss goodbye to the clutch, and see what she'll do when driven hard.
I'd guess a copy of the timeslip from one mid-high 11 second pass would boost sales tremendously.
(hee hee. Geddit? 'boost sales'. Sometimes I'm so sharp, I cut myself)
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 978
From: belmont, CA (bay area)
Rep Power: 62
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Captain Tal
Sweet. Thanks for the info. Sharky, how does that compare to a stock Turbo?
Sweet. Thanks for the info. Sharky, how does that compare to a stock Turbo?
Originally posted by PMac
Finally! That's the number most of us have been waiting to hear ever since we first heard about the SC development project.
Great trap speed.
For real bragging rights, give the car to an experienced drag racer, kiss goodbye to the clutch, and see what she'll do when driven hard.
I'd guess a copy of the timeslip from one mid-high 11 second pass would boost sales tremendously.
(hee hee. Geddit? 'boost sales'. Sometimes I'm so sharp, I cut myself)
Finally! That's the number most of us have been waiting to hear ever since we first heard about the SC development project.
Great trap speed.
For real bragging rights, give the car to an experienced drag racer, kiss goodbye to the clutch, and see what she'll do when driven hard.
I'd guess a copy of the timeslip from one mid-high 11 second pass would boost sales tremendously.
(hee hee. Geddit? 'boost sales'. Sometimes I'm so sharp, I cut myself)
Seeing as it was Todd's own car and that he's more into the road course stuf and not big on drag racing I know he took it easy on the launches.... Give the car to me or another drag racer and we'll dump the living crap outta the clutch and hopefully pull 1.7 60 foots and some high 11s
(11.7/11.6)
Originally posted by karlooz
hey sharkey, where can i do some timed 60-130 runs
1/4 runs are too burtal on the tranny :O
hey sharkey, where can i do some timed 60-130 runs
1/4 runs are too burtal on the tranny :O
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 118
From: Spring, Texas
Rep Power: 25
Originally posted by sharkster
Most car mags ran 12.2-12.4 for the 911 Turbo. THe mph is in the 115 range I believe. So it certainly beats a stock turbo...
Most car mags ran 12.2-12.4 for the 911 Turbo. THe mph is in the 115 range I believe. So it certainly beats a stock turbo...
Was the 997 stock except for the SC, or were there
other things done to it......gotta compare apples
to apples if you are comparing it to a stock turbo.
P1 911
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 296
From: Washington D.C.
Rep Power: 37
Wow, the first concrete documented results of what the EVO SC'ed package will do. Good stuff. I wonder why they didn't do the same test for their 996 packages!? (Although it would seem to me the results should be identical if not slightly faster for the 996 3.6 being they're a lil' lighter...)
What "other" supporting mods were done to this 997? Or was it completely stock expect for the SC kit?
---Kevin D.
PS: Anyone here run their 996TT's on THAT same track? (stock or modified) At 1300+ feet I know cars suffer worst than the "correction factor" suggest sometimes. Plus, we don't know what the traction is like on that track unless we have other 996's to compare it with.
What "other" supporting mods were done to this 997? Or was it completely stock expect for the SC kit?
---Kevin D.
PS: Anyone here run their 996TT's on THAT same track? (stock or modified) At 1300+ feet I know cars suffer worst than the "correction factor" suggest sometimes. Plus, we don't know what the traction is like on that track unless we have other 996's to compare it with.
Last edited by Kevin D; Jan 5, 2006 at 03:17 PM.
Originally posted by ZX9RCAM
Was the 997 stock except for the SC, or were there
other things done to it......gotta compare apples
to apples if you are comparing it to a stock turbo.
Was the 997 stock except for the SC, or were there
other things done to it......gotta compare apples
to apples if you are comparing it to a stock turbo.
Originally posted by Kevin D
Wow, the first concrete documented results of what the EVO SC'ed package will do. Good stuff. I wonder why they didn't do the same test for their 996 packages!? (Although it would seem to me the results should be identical if not slightly faster for the 996 3.6 being they're a lil' lighter...)
What "other" supporting mods were done to this 997? Or was it completely stock expect for the SC kit?
---Kevin D.
PS: Anyone here run their 996TT's on THAT same track? (stock or modified) At 1300+ feet I know cars suffer worst than the "correction factor" suggest sometimes. Plus, we don't know what the traction is like on that track unless we have other 996's to compare it with.
Wow, the first concrete documented results of what the EVO SC'ed package will do. Good stuff. I wonder why they didn't do the same test for their 996 packages!? (Although it would seem to me the results should be identical if not slightly faster for the 996 3.6 being they're a lil' lighter...)
What "other" supporting mods were done to this 997? Or was it completely stock expect for the SC kit?
---Kevin D.
PS: Anyone here run their 996TT's on THAT same track? (stock or modified) At 1300+ feet I know cars suffer worst than the "correction factor" suggest sometimes. Plus, we don't know what the traction is like on that track unless we have other 996's to compare it with.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AJUSA.com
997 Vendor Classifieds
4
Oct 8, 2015 05:50 PM
