Proto 100-200 kph data
#31
03-17-2010, 02:21 PM
This is the product:
http://www.performancebox.co.uk/overview.html
Many of the vendors will get you one for a pretty good deal. (I can't advocate one over the other.) It is a very useful tool for enthusiasts.
- bob
http://www.performancebox.co.uk/overview.html
Many of the vendors will get you one for a pretty good deal. (I can't advocate one over the other.) It is a very useful tool for enthusiasts.
- bob
#32
03-17-2010, 02:50 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Athens
Age: 47
Posts: 1,671
Rep Power: 133 
guys i think we are confusing 100-200km with 60-130miles run times...i run 6,3 100-200 not 60-130...My previous 996TT rated at 690hp did 6,2sec for 60-130...i do not think 6,3 100-200km is a fast time...however it is very good for just a flash...
#33
03-17-2010, 02:55 PM
Actually, if you look at previous datalogs for the 997TT, a large number of them run 100-200 km/h in about 6.5 to 7 seconds for a flash + exhaust.
Case in point, look at MadSex343's run...ECU + exhaust:
His 100-200 km/h (62-124 mph) will be somewhere around 6.5 seconds on pump fuel.
So...a 6.3 100-200 km/hr run with a flash only is pretty exceptional.
Case in point, look at MadSex343's run...ECU + exhaust:
His 100-200 km/h (62-124 mph) will be somewhere around 6.5 seconds on pump fuel.
So...a 6.3 100-200 km/hr run with a flash only is pretty exceptional.
Last edited by bbywu; 03-17-2010 at 04:25 PM.
#35
03-17-2010, 04:03 PM
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fastlane USA
Posts: 2,319
Rep Power: 244 
the only thing i nkow to do is to get those number/resaults.
#36
03-17-2010, 04:09 PM
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fastlane USA
Posts: 2,319
Rep Power: 244
That's the very question I'm trying to get at. So many numbers out but very little supporting and verifiable data from customers, at least that I can find. As I mentioned earlier, Eclou has a post with vtgs showing Pbox charts for 100-200 and 60-130. It would interesting to see the variation between different tunes with similar packages from a customer's perspective.
#37
03-17-2010, 04:18 PM
I did not have a second gear graph showing 35-70. The only one I had was 40-70 mph in 1.52s.
#38
03-17-2010, 04:18 PM
A 60-130 or 100-200 dedicated run is run differently on a manual transmission car than a flat out 0-Vmax run like at the mile. What gear you start from, number of shifts make all the difference. Something to consider when looking at the numbers.
- bob
- bob
#39
03-17-2010, 04:27 PM
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fastlane USA
Posts: 2,319
Rep Power: 244 Good point.
#41
03-17-2010, 06:16 PM
Actually, if you look at previous datalogs for the 997TT, a large number of them run 100-200 km/h in about 6.5 to 7 seconds for a flash + exhaust.
Case in point, look at MadSex343's run...ECU + exhaust:
His 100-200 km/h (62-124 mph) will be somewhere around 6.5 seconds on pump fuel.
So...a 6.3 100-200 km/hr run with a flash only is pretty exceptional.
Case in point, look at MadSex343's run...ECU + exhaust:
His 100-200 km/h (62-124 mph) will be somewhere around 6.5 seconds on pump fuel.
So...a 6.3 100-200 km/hr run with a flash only is pretty exceptional.
Actually if I am not mistaking (will have to double check) this exact same run if extracted for 100-200km/h results in 6.1 secs
Will try to get it for you from the entire file if possible...
But you get the picture! By the way I have a run of 7.5 sec with just the exhaust on a completely stock car otherwise and always use your equivalent of 93 oct pump fuel here...
#42
03-17-2010, 06:47 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: denver/Saudi
Age: 38
Posts: 3,115
Rep Power: 163
congrats on the kit bro, I was waiting for these number to add it to my chart .
I would really appreciate if you can do another runs like 0-60,0-100, 60-130 so I can compare it to the others number from different cars
Abdullah
. I would really appreciate if you can do another runs like 0-60,0-100, 60-130 so I can compare it to the others number from different cars
Abdullah
#43
03-17-2010, 07:48 PM
Actually if I am not mistaking (will have to double check) this exact same run if extracted for 100-200km/h results in 6.1 secs
Will try to get it for you from the entire file if possible...
But you get the picture! By the way I have a run of 7.5 sec with just the exhaust on a completely stock car otherwise and always use your equivalent of 93 oct pump fuel here...
Will try to get it for you from the entire file if possible...
But you get the picture! By the way I have a run of 7.5 sec with just the exhaust on a completely stock car otherwise and always use your equivalent of 93 oct pump fuel here...
Which is why I think a 6.3 on a flash alone is very very good!
#44
03-17-2010, 10:41 PM
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fastlane USA
Posts: 2,319
Rep Power: 244 Actually if I am not mistaking (will have to double check) this exact same run if extracted for 100-200km/h results in 6.1 secs
Will try to get it for you from the entire file if possible...
But you get the picture! By the way I have a run of 7.5 sec with just the exhaust on a completely stock car otherwise and always use your equivalent of 93 oct pump fuel here...
Will try to get it for you from the entire file if possible...
But you get the picture! By the way I have a run of 7.5 sec with just the exhaust on a completely stock car otherwise and always use your equivalent of 93 oct pump fuel here...
#45
03-17-2010, 11:47 PM
So if I understand correctly, you ran a 6.1 (100-200 km/h) with just a flash and exhaust on pump 93, everything else being stock? And Eclou posted a 6.0 with AWE 700/750R kit (filter, headers, ICs, turbos, etc..) using race fuel? That's one remarkable flash you got there.
