Whats Fastest? 997TTS vs GTR vs SLS vs LFA
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 119
From: Oregon, USA
Rep Power: 25
Whats Fastest? 997TTS vs GTR vs SLS vs LFA
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 288
From: Connecticut
Rep Power: 45
Watching the video, you see the guys blows the launch on the GT-R.
I know the TTS is faster than GT-R. But in this video its exaggerated by the poor dig.
Here we go again with Porsche vs. GT-R
I know the TTS is faster than GT-R. But in this video its exaggerated by the poor dig.
Here we go again with Porsche vs. GT-R
Trending Topics
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,219
From: Fayetteville
Rep Power: 499
The TTS should be way ahead of the GT-R. I think the 2012 DBA-R35 would be a better challenger. Nissan reacted to Porsche's improvements. Competition is good for everybody.
But I agree with the rcalcaide, the poor start will exaggerate the difference in performance.
But I agree with the rcalcaide, the poor start will exaggerate the difference in performance.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
From: boulder, co
Rep Power: 0
Great article from AutoCar magazine. I happened to pick up a hard copy for plane reading coming back to the states from London.
The TTS time was 11.04 1/4 @ 129.35, 3.01 0-60, standing 1 km in 20.05 with a top speed of 163.2 mph. The GT-R figures were 11.98 @ 120.35, 21.65 @ 153.9. At the end the TTS was probably ahead by around 375 feet (1.6 secs at 160 mph). The TTS 0-60 and 1/4 were the best with the F458 2nd best at 3.27/11.29. The winner at 1 km was a Noble M600, which ran 20 flat @ 173.8 (with a 6 speed). In the article, they raced 3 cars against each other at a time and then the three winners (TTS, M600 and F458) in a race off. The GT-R was up against the M600 and SLS and according to the article was several car lengths ahead "in an instant" before falling back.
The TTS time was 11.04 1/4 @ 129.35, 3.01 0-60, standing 1 km in 20.05 with a top speed of 163.2 mph. The GT-R figures were 11.98 @ 120.35, 21.65 @ 153.9. At the end the TTS was probably ahead by around 375 feet (1.6 secs at 160 mph). The TTS 0-60 and 1/4 were the best with the F458 2nd best at 3.27/11.29. The winner at 1 km was a Noble M600, which ran 20 flat @ 173.8 (with a 6 speed). In the article, they raced 3 cars against each other at a time and then the three winners (TTS, M600 and F458) in a race off. The GT-R was up against the M600 and SLS and according to the article was several car lengths ahead "in an instant" before falling back.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 748
From: New York
Rep Power: 64
Great article from AutoCar magazine. I happened to pick up a hard copy for plane reading coming back to the states from London.
The TTS time was 11.04 1/4 @ 129.35, 3.01 0-60, standing 1 km in 20.05 with a top speed of 163.2 mph. The GT-R figures were 11.98 @ 120.35, 21.65 @ 153.9. At the end the TTS was probably ahead by around 375 feet (1.6 secs at 160 mph). The TTS 0-60 and 1/4 were the best with the F458 2nd best at 3.27/11.29. The winner at 1 km was a Noble M600, which ran 20 flat @ 173.8 (with a 6 speed). In the article, they raced 3 cars against each other at a time and then the three winners (TTS, M600 and F458) in a race off. The GT-R was up against the M600 and SLS and according to the article was several car lengths ahead "in an instant" before falling back.
The TTS time was 11.04 1/4 @ 129.35, 3.01 0-60, standing 1 km in 20.05 with a top speed of 163.2 mph. The GT-R figures were 11.98 @ 120.35, 21.65 @ 153.9. At the end the TTS was probably ahead by around 375 feet (1.6 secs at 160 mph). The TTS 0-60 and 1/4 were the best with the F458 2nd best at 3.27/11.29. The winner at 1 km was a Noble M600, which ran 20 flat @ 173.8 (with a 6 speed). In the article, they raced 3 cars against each other at a time and then the three winners (TTS, M600 and F458) in a race off. The GT-R was up against the M600 and SLS and according to the article was several car lengths ahead "in an instant" before falling back.
