Engine Limits vs Power -- Sharing Some Knowledge
TQ is more the reason for killing motors than HP.. Reason why we try to oversize the turbo on many applications pushing the limits.. Also the reason why we opt for 3071s over 28s to keep the TQ down.. We do the same with all the evos we build.. I have 1 evo running 635whp on a 2.0L engine.. Do the math on that, thats 150+ per cyl.. which would be over 900whp on a 6cyl.. and trust me the rods in an evo are nothing to write home about either.. But we dial out the TQ on them with longer runner manifolds and turbos and they hold ok but are a ticking time bomb at 600+ dont get me wrong.. I have seen rods fly from the blocks with 100 less HP because the TQ will pull the rod bolts right out..
Here is what we find.. The main engine killer is this.. And i am NOT suggesting anything about Champions engine im just sharing some of my knowledge.. In no particular order..
1. Poor tune
2. Bad tank of gas ( only takes 1 bad tank and its WAY MORE COMMON than you think to get bad gas )
3. Torque
4. HIGH RPM ( not so much an issue with Porsche as they dont rev too high but an overrev will do it )
The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. its easy to get an idea on how much boost is run based on low end TQ.. if you feed the boost on gradually itll last longer..
Here is what we find.. The main engine killer is this.. And i am NOT suggesting anything about Champions engine im just sharing some of my knowledge.. In no particular order..
1. Poor tune
2. Bad tank of gas ( only takes 1 bad tank and its WAY MORE COMMON than you think to get bad gas )
3. Torque
4. HIGH RPM ( not so much an issue with Porsche as they dont rev too high but an overrev will do it )
The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. its easy to get an idea on how much boost is run based on low end TQ.. if you feed the boost on gradually itll last longer..
Last edited by TTdude; Apr 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM.
never heard of any tune, oem or the best tuner ever that has NO knock. There is noise, you just need to listen/see voltage. Just saying, no tunes with super high or even low power ever are completely knock free as in 0 knock counts, 0 voltage to the knock sensor/feedback
Hmmm....maybe it's just me but this seems like a contridiction. You say no knock, car running at "much lower power level" but at the same time you say it's running on pump gas program at 725awhp (not that much lower) which is what caused the problem.
It seems to me that it's not the pressure per se at that power level but rather uncontrolled pressure due to detonation from wrong fuel use.
It seems to me that it's not the pressure per se at that power level but rather uncontrolled pressure due to detonation from wrong fuel use.
Secondly...with the GIAC software, "pump" gas is an entirely separate mode which is controlled by switching programs using the flashloader. Each mode is optimized for the particular fuel you're running.
I agree rods bent due to overload however, what methods did you use to determine whether detonation was or wasnt present within the cylinders at the time? Did you re use the pistons?
What methods did you use to determine if there was no knock/detonation? Visual inspection does not tell the full story.
What methods did you use to determine if there was no knock/detonation? Visual inspection does not tell the full story.
if I recall correctly, Switzer's higher-horsepower (800+hp) motors use non-vtg turbos and AM rods. Don't know about Proto, but I think they also upgrade rods etc. in high h.p. builds. Also, Tom's statement re: no knock makes perfect sense, whether one chooses to read carefully or not. GIAC, and all other responsible tuners, leave all the Porsche safes in place. To remove or dilute them would be suicidal for the tuner. Torque seems the culprit here, doesn't it? Champion should be congratulated for their transparency and honesty. As they stated, this is THEIR car, THEIR motor. They did not have to say squat about this to anybody, but shared with us all. Thanks, Champion.
Trust me, if the rods bent because we ran a batch of bad fuel, or the was knock present of any kind, the first line of my thread would have said "watch out for bad fuel", or "this is what happens when you have excessive knock"....but it simply wasn't the case here. Maybe this car had a weak engine, maybe it was built on a Friday...who knows. I only put this thread up to share our experience. Some people may run this power level and never have issues, but knowing that it COULD happen was what prompted me to share our experience. As a policy, I'm very open and candid about the research and development we do here. I have nothing to gain from posting this up, other then to simply share what's going on between our 4 walls.
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
I should maybe clarify. With the GIAC software there are a couple things to keep in mind. For one, ALL of the factory knock control is still functional, with both the upper and lower FACTORY limits in place. If by some chance you get a bad batch of fuel, then the factory failsafes will intervene restrict power. Fuel was carefully monitored and 99% of the time this car ran, whether on the dyno or on the street, it was carefully datalogged to make sure knock was not an issue.
When tuning for maximum power at a certain octane level, if the tune isn't perfect or bad gas is used, all it takes is an over-advanced ignition event (typically caused by pre-ignition) or a detonation event to bend rods....knock sensors or not. Also, too much torque can cause it as well, without pre-ignition or detonation.
Not saying these are the only possibilities, but they are probabilities for sure.
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
That's exactly right. They aren't infallible, and only help to a certain point.
^^ Read this. The "speculation" was offered by the OP. To make 725 awhp on pump with vtgs is just not the same as A3076s. This raises further questions as to what pump program makes 725 awhp on vtgs???
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
During it’s daily use and prior dyno testing, the car was running a pump gas program at 725awhp, which is what we’re confident caused the damage.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
During it’s daily use and prior dyno testing, the car was running a pump gas program at 725awhp, which is what we’re confident caused the damage.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Last edited by TTdude; Apr 24, 2011 at 06:53 PM.
No, we installed new Mahle pistons and Carillo rods. As I mentioned above, this car was carefully datalogged nearly every single time we ran it, whether on the dyno or on the street. The GIAC software suite allows us to monitor just about every single operating parameter of the ECU, with at least a few dozen channels that Durametric (for example) doesn't display.
As a policy, I'm very open and candid about the research and development we do here. I have nothing to gain from posting this up, other then to simply share what's going on between our 4 walls.
As a policy, I'm very open and candid about the research and development we do here. I have nothing to gain from posting this up, other then to simply share what's going on between our 4 walls.

Pistons get pitted from use and change compression values.
I don't know anyone who reuses pistons. That's like reusing spark plugs (if sparkies were located in the most inconvenient place in the motor which they aren't). If you're cracking the cases open you might as well put new stuff in it.
Depending upon what industry sector your from, plenty of engine repairers out there that will reuse pistons (altho we personally don't). It often comes down to the mileage of the engine and the checks and measurements to the pistons that determines if replacement is necessary.
Here is post number 3380 back in January 2009 regarding this subject. It will help shed some light on the issue.

https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post2678928
Last edited by cjv; Apr 24, 2011 at 08:10 PM.
Thanks for your open candor Tom and sorry to see you get put under the hammer for showing the bent rods but a quick brinell hardness test to the old pistons (crowns and skirts/pin boss area) should put this argument of detonation to bed. Do you have a hardness testing device?
Rods can bend, obviously, but more importantly what is the cause in this case? Too much tq, too high revs, wrong fuel on race file or is it really the limit as Tom implies? That's what folks are driving at. As you know, there are many 700+ whp cars out there on stock motor without bent rods. Cheers, Dave
Paul, This is a critical bunch, you being one of them.
Rods can bend, obviously, but more importantly what is the cause in this case? Too much tq, too high revs, wrong fuel on race file or is it really the limit as Tom implies? That's what folks are driving at. As you know, there are many 700+ whp cars out there on stock motor without bent rods. Cheers, Dave
Rods can bend, obviously, but more importantly what is the cause in this case? Too much tq, too high revs, wrong fuel on race file or is it really the limit as Tom implies? That's what folks are driving at. As you know, there are many 700+ whp cars out there on stock motor without bent rods. Cheers, Dave
. And agree there are a number of 700whp cars put there without bent rods however, on a serious note, as there is quite a lot of speculation going on here If Tom wishes to provide me those numbers I can clear up for you guys whether the fuel or tune played any part in the bending of the rods. Engine and component failure diagnosis is one of our specialties. Provide me the numbers across all 4 pistons...
.Toms call.
PS. would also like a pic of the upper BE shells, lowers too. A report on the valves/valve seats and guides would also be nice along with how many KMs the engine has done....b4 and after tune. I'd truly love to get all the facts on how these engines really stand up to these high HP tunes over the cycle.
Last edited by speed21; Apr 25, 2011 at 12:45 AM.






