997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Engine Limits vs Power -- Sharing Some Knowledge

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:26 AM
  #31  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
TQ is more the reason for killing motors than HP.. Reason why we try to oversize the turbo on many applications pushing the limits.. Also the reason why we opt for 3071s over 28s to keep the TQ down.. We do the same with all the evos we build.. I have 1 evo running 635whp on a 2.0L engine.. Do the math on that, thats 150+ per cyl.. which would be over 900whp on a 6cyl.. and trust me the rods in an evo are nothing to write home about either.. But we dial out the TQ on them with longer runner manifolds and turbos and they hold ok but are a ticking time bomb at 600+ dont get me wrong.. I have seen rods fly from the blocks with 100 less HP because the TQ will pull the rod bolts right out..

Here is what we find.. The main engine killer is this.. And i am NOT suggesting anything about Champions engine im just sharing some of my knowledge.. In no particular order..

1. Poor tune
2. Bad tank of gas ( only takes 1 bad tank and its WAY MORE COMMON than you think to get bad gas )
3. Torque
4. HIGH RPM ( not so much an issue with Porsche as they dont rev too high but an overrev will do it )

The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. its easy to get an idea on how much boost is run based on low end TQ.. if you feed the boost on gradually itll last longer..
+1, especially with decent rods such that Porsche has. Crap happens but usually there's a reason and in this case it probably falls within categories 1-4 based on the OP's description rather than the absolute 700 whp number per se.
 

Last edited by TTdude; Apr 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:39 AM
  #32  
MorePSiTehBett4's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 277
From: Clarkesville, Georgia
Rep Power: 31
MorePSiTehBett4 is just really niceMorePSiTehBett4 is just really niceMorePSiTehBett4 is just really niceMorePSiTehBett4 is just really nice
never heard of any tune, oem or the best tuner ever that has NO knock. There is noise, you just need to listen/see voltage. Just saying, no tunes with super high or even low power ever are completely knock free as in 0 knock counts, 0 voltage to the knock sensor/feedback
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:50 AM
  #33  
Tom@Champion's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
From: Pompano Beach, FL
Rep Power: 0
Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
Hmmm....maybe it's just me but this seems like a contridiction. You say no knock, car running at "much lower power level" but at the same time you say it's running on pump gas program at 725awhp (not that much lower) which is what caused the problem.

It seems to me that it's not the pressure per se at that power level but rather uncontrolled pressure due to detonation from wrong fuel use.
I should maybe clarify. With the GIAC software there are a couple things to keep in mind. For one, ALL of the factory knock control is still functional, with both the upper and lower FACTORY limits in place. If by some chance you get a bad batch of fuel, then the factory failsafes will intervene restrict power. Fuel was carefully monitored and 99% of the time this car ran, whether on the dyno or on the street, it was carefully datalogged to make sure knock was not an issue.

Secondly...with the GIAC software, "pump" gas is an entirely separate mode which is controlled by switching programs using the flashloader. Each mode is optimized for the particular fuel you're running.


Originally Posted by speed21
I agree rods bent due to overload however, what methods did you use to determine whether detonation was or wasnt present within the cylinders at the time? Did you re use the pistons?


What methods did you use to determine if there was no knock/detonation? Visual inspection does not tell the full story.
No, we installed new Mahle pistons and Carillo rods. As I mentioned above, this car was carefully datalogged nearly every single time we ran it, whether on the dyno or on the street. The GIAC software suite allows us to monitor just about every single operating parameter of the ECU, with at least a few dozen channels that Durametric (for example) doesn't display.

Originally Posted by bumperpip
if I recall correctly, Switzer's higher-horsepower (800+hp) motors use non-vtg turbos and AM rods. Don't know about Proto, but I think they also upgrade rods etc. in high h.p. builds. Also, Tom's statement re: no knock makes perfect sense, whether one chooses to read carefully or not. GIAC, and all other responsible tuners, leave all the Porsche safes in place. To remove or dilute them would be suicidal for the tuner. Torque seems the culprit here, doesn't it? Champion should be congratulated for their transparency and honesty. As they stated, this is THEIR car, THEIR motor. They did not have to say squat about this to anybody, but shared with us all. Thanks, Champion.
You're correct bumper...with the GIAC software, all the factory upper and lower limits are left intact. This is why we use GIAC as our exclusive tuning partner.

Trust me, if the rods bent because we ran a batch of bad fuel, or the was knock present of any kind, the first line of my thread would have said "watch out for bad fuel", or "this is what happens when you have excessive knock"....but it simply wasn't the case here. Maybe this car had a weak engine, maybe it was built on a Friday...who knows. I only put this thread up to share our experience. Some people may run this power level and never have issues, but knowing that it COULD happen was what prompted me to share our experience. As a policy, I'm very open and candid about the research and development we do here. I have nothing to gain from posting this up, other then to simply share what's going on between our 4 walls.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 11:01 AM
  #34  
GT-TT's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 176
From: london
Rep Power: 24
GT-TT is infamous around these partsGT-TT is infamous around these parts
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "

..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #35  
Boostholic's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
From: France
Rep Power: 0
Boostholic is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by GT-TT
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "

..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
Ur still using GT2 intake manifold on ur car??
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #36  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
I should maybe clarify. With the GIAC software there are a couple things to keep in mind. For one, ALL of the factory knock control is still functional, with both the upper and lower FACTORY limits in place. If by some chance you get a bad batch of fuel, then the factory failsafes will intervene restrict power. Fuel was carefully monitored and 99% of the time this car ran, whether on the dyno or on the street, it was carefully datalogged to make sure knock was not an issue.
FYI, as far as I'm aware, all of the tuners that use the factory Motronics leave the OEM knock control intact. I know both of my Protomotive setups did, and I imagine EPL and SPI does as well. But the factory knock sensors only work up to a point. If they were truly infallible, you could run 2.0 BAR on 91 octane without any worries.

When tuning for maximum power at a certain octane level, if the tune isn't perfect or bad gas is used, all it takes is an over-advanced ignition event (typically caused by pre-ignition) or a detonation event to bend rods....knock sensors or not. Also, too much torque can cause it as well, without pre-ignition or detonation.

Not saying these are the only possibilities, but they are probabilities for sure.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #37  
TXTurbo's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 308
From: Austin, TX
Rep Power: 34
TXTurbo is just really niceTXTurbo is just really niceTXTurbo is just really niceTXTurbo is just really nice
I think knock sensors react to knock to limit it but they do not prevent it. Once knock is detected the ECU can pull timing and adjust fuel.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #38  
rayman89's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 104
From: London
Rep Power: 20
rayman89 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by GT-TT
"The engine i mentioned above making 635whp is on ethanol as is every car i own.. Ethanol will keep a motor alive with a poor tune longer than 93 octane will.. Its less prone to knock of course.. Its also dependent upon how you feed boost into the powerband.. If you have the HUGE peak of TQ that hits down low its more prone to hurting the motor and that has a lot to do with boost request.. "

..which is EXACTLY what I like about this engine; that you can get 950nm+ from 3000 rpm with VTGs. Hence i changed the rods to be able to get that. Like that you have 450hp at 3.5k and 600+ by 4.5k and its a blast. I guess with 3071s you can get even more, even lower..
Was running 670hp with 880nm with stock rods and nothing happened. We opened engine and rods were ok for that power level.
(going a bit off topic) Where can you buy ethanol in london???, closest pump is morrisons in swindon i think and thats e85
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #39  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TXTurbo
I think knock sensors react to knock to limit it but they do not prevent it. Once knock is detected the ECU can pull timing and adjust fuel.
That's exactly right. They aren't infallible, and only help to a certain point.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 06:22 PM
  #40  
NickW's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11
From: Central Florida
Rep Power: 0
NickW is infamous around these partsNickW is infamous around these partsNickW is infamous around these partsNickW is infamous around these parts
xxxx
 

Last edited by NickW; Apr 26, 2011 at 09:17 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #41  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
^^ Read this. The "speculation" was offered by the OP. To make 725 awhp on pump with vtgs is just not the same as A3076s. This raises further questions as to what pump program makes 725 awhp on vtgs???


<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
During it’s daily use and prior dyno testing, the car was running a pump gas program at 725awhp, which is what we’re confident caused the damage.




</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

Last edited by TTdude; Apr 24, 2011 at 06:53 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #42  
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 249
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
No, we installed new Mahle pistons and Carillo rods. As I mentioned above, this car was carefully datalogged nearly every single time we ran it, whether on the dyno or on the street. The GIAC software suite allows us to monitor just about every single operating parameter of the ECU, with at least a few dozen channels that Durametric (for example) doesn't display.

As a policy, I'm very open and candid about the research and development we do here. I have nothing to gain from posting this up, other then to simply share what's going on between our 4 walls.
Thanks for your open candor Tom and sorry to see you get put under the hammer for showing the bent rods but a quick brinell hardness test to the old pistons (crowns and skirts/pin boss area) should put this argument of detonation to bed. Do you have a hardness testing device?

Originally Posted by NickW

Pistons get pitted from use and change compression values.

I don't know anyone who reuses pistons. That's like reusing spark plugs (if sparkies were located in the most inconvenient place in the motor which they aren't). If you're cracking the cases open you might as well put new stuff in it.
Have never heard that said before now. Must be some serious pitting to alter compression values?

Depending upon what industry sector your from, plenty of engine repairers out there that will reuse pistons (altho we personally don't). It often comes down to the mileage of the engine and the checks and measurements to the pistons that determines if replacement is necessary.
 
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #43  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
That's exactly right. They aren't infallible, and only help to a certain point.
This is why with our current build we scraped the Porsche system and had Link design and build one. It uses sensors in all cylinders.

Here is post number 3380 back in January 2009 regarding this subject. It will help shed some light on the issue.
https://www.6speedonline.com/forums/...ml#post2678928
 

Last edited by cjv; Apr 24, 2011 at 08:10 PM.
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 10:40 PM
  #44  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by speed21
Thanks for your open candor Tom and sorry to see you get put under the hammer for showing the bent rods but a quick brinell hardness test to the old pistons (crowns and skirts/pin boss area) should put this argument of detonation to bed. Do you have a hardness testing device?
Paul, This is a critical bunch, you being one of them. Rods can bend, obviously, but more importantly what is the cause in this case? Too much tq, too high revs, wrong fuel on race file or is it really the limit as Tom implies? That's what folks are driving at. As you know, there are many 700+ whp cars out there on stock motor without bent rods. Cheers, Dave
 
Old Apr 25, 2011 | 12:39 AM
  #45  
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 249
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
Paul, This is a critical bunch, you being one of them. Rods can bend, obviously, but more importantly what is the cause in this case? Too much tq, too high revs, wrong fuel on race file or is it really the limit as Tom implies? That's what folks are driving at. As you know, there are many 700+ whp cars out there on stock motor without bent rods. Cheers, Dave
No argument about that Dave!. And agree there are a number of 700whp cars put there without bent rods however, on a serious note, as there is quite a lot of speculation going on here If Tom wishes to provide me those numbers I can clear up for you guys whether the fuel or tune played any part in the bending of the rods. Engine and component failure diagnosis is one of our specialties. Provide me the numbers across all 4 pistons....Toms call.
PS. would also like a pic of the upper BE shells, lowers too. A report on the valves/valve seats and guides would also be nice along with how many KMs the engine has done....b4 and after tune. I'd truly love to get all the facts on how these engines really stand up to these high HP tunes over the cycle.
 

Last edited by speed21; Apr 25, 2011 at 12:45 AM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.