997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Engine Limits vs Power -- Sharing Some Knowledge

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 01:12 PM
  #1  
Tom@Champion's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
From: Pompano Beach, FL
Rep Power: 0
Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !
Engine Limits vs Power -- Sharing Some Knowledge

So there’s been a bit of talk lately about exactly what power levels the 997.1 and 997.2 Turbo motors are capable of handling in their completely stock form. Having done quite a bit of research and accumulated quite a bit of experience on the matter, I thought it might be time to share some of what we’ve learned, about both engine platforms. The good, the bad, and the ugly…

There story starts here, everyone remember this car?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HjodyfW95c

This car was built with the intention of testing both the upper limit of the stock engine internals, as well as our new (at the time) 68mm VTG turbochargers. Not too long after the 777 awhp dyno run was done, we noticed that the car was starting to feel down on power. (As a footnote, that dyno run was done at a 3rd party facility, not ours, and was run by the dyno owner, not us). So, noticing the car was down on power, we decided to trouble shoot the typical areas….hoses, vacuum leaks, etc., but everything was fine. The next step was to perform a compression test on all 6 cylinders, which is when the reality set in. Each cylinder displayed a dramatically different psi number, which is when we knew the engine had to come apart because there was internal damage. After a day or two of removal and tear-down, this is what we saw:







*note: There are only 4 rods pictures because the worst two were sent out for analysis*. The cylinder pressure created by generating this amount of power has obviously caused some serious damage to the rods. Once the rods become deformed in any way, you’ve basically got a ticking time bomb in your engine, and they’re not likely to last much longer at all. Luckily, we became suspicious early enough to prevent any further damage, like a total engine failure. Keep in mind, this is after only a few dynos run at this power level. During it’s daily use and prior dyno testing, the car was running a pump gas program at 725awhp, which is what we’re confident caused the damage.

At this point we decided that we had to try to transfer some of this experience to the new 997.2 TT engine that we’ve been working so hard to make power with. The PDK and fuel system were already a known problem, but in order to prevent any potential issues, we thought it would be wise to make a comparison between the stock 997.1 and stock 997.2 rods. So were ordered up a complete set of both and had them sent out to an third party facility to conduct some strength test analysis.

Unfortunately what we suspected about the .2 rods is true. They proved to have about a 11-12% lower tensil strength then their .1 counterparts, which unfortunately also means that a lower cylinder pressure will cause them to deform. Right now, we’re guessing that that level is unfortunately somewhere around the 650 awhp range. Now, before anyone asks the question….no, we did not do any damage to the stock rods or engine internals in our 997.2 PDK test car or “blow up” any .2 Turbo engines. Strangely, this one of the few occasions that we’re actually glad the PDK and fuel system limited the amount of power we could put down. If it wasn’t for those two roadblocks, there’s a good chance we would have already pushed that engine far beyond that power level and done some serious damage. Moving forward, we plan to upgrade the internals before adding any more power. The upgraded parts are already here and ready to go into our new PDK test vehicle. The War Admiral has retired to greener pastures and the entire project has moved on to a new test car, one which you’ll see a lot more of soon.

Moral of the story: if you’re out there on a completely stock engine with a power kit capable of making over 700 wheel horsepower, and you just don’t think the car feels quite as stout as it used to, now might be the best time to invest in an engine build.

As always, thanks for reading, and if you have any questions feel free to post ‘em up.
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 01:26 PM
  #2  
TT Gasman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,989
From: Texas
Rep Power: 117
TT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant futureTT Gasman has a brilliant future
Thanks for the post.
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 02:37 PM
  #3  
Arone997tt's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 339
From: CT
Rep Power: 43
Arone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud ofArone997tt has much to be proud of
Awesome write up as usual, Tom...This is why only Champion will touch my car!!!
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 03:20 PM
  #4  
M5 Wheelman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 79
From: Massachusetts
Rep Power: 20
M5 Wheelman has a spectacular aura aboutM5 Wheelman has a spectacular aura about
I figured you guys would have some better methods than the old "lets keep increasing the power until it blows up" approach I've seen people use (though on much less expensive cars where the complete engine might be <$10k). Excellent write up as usual, thank you.
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 03:59 PM
  #5  
cjv's Avatar
cjv
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 22,235
Rep Power: 1227
cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !cjv Is a GOD !
We learned this back in 2004. I believe this was the first set of bent rods on a 996tt. Again around 700 hp.


 

Last edited by cjv; Apr 22, 2011 at 04:04 PM.
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 04:04 PM
  #6  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Interesting. I believe Keith's Proto car and Switzer Sledgehammer ran 850+ whp on stock internals and when opened up, no signs of bent rods. Maybe you got some knock?
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
Divexxtreme's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,509
From: Virginia, USA
Rep Power: 789
Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !Divexxtreme Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by TTdude
Interesting. I believe Keith's Proto car and Switzer Sledgehammer ran 850+ whp on stock internals and when opened up, no signs of bent rods. Maybe you got some knock?
Took the words right out my mouth. Either knock or too much torque. My GT2 had been running 750-800 rwhp at 1.6-1.8 BAR before I built the motor. The stock rods were perfect when we opened her up:
 
Attached Images  

Last edited by Divexxtreme; Apr 22, 2011 at 04:30 PM.
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
Boostholic's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 27
From: France
Rep Power: 0
Boostholic is infamous around these parts
+700whp on pumpgas would cause bent rods

Both SPI and Proto use racegas on that power range
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 04:50 PM
  #9  
Tom@Champion's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
From: Pompano Beach, FL
Rep Power: 0
Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !Tom@Champion Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by M5 Wheelman
I figured you guys would have some better methods than the old "lets keep increasing the power until it blows up" approach I've seen people use (though on much less expensive cars where the complete engine might be <$10k). Excellent write up as usual, thank you.
Well, that wasn't quite the idea. Unfortunately with the rods out of the engine, there's not really a scientific way to determine exactly at what power level they're prone to damage. The idea was primarily to see what kind of power we could make with our 68mm VTG's. The car belonged to us, and still belongs to us, so it serves as a test mule. Unfortunately, the reality is that in situations like this, you never quite know what the limit is until you cross it.

Originally Posted by TTdude
Interesting. I believe Keith's Proto car and Switzer Sledgehammer ran 850+ whp on stock internals and when opened up, no signs of bent rods. Maybe you got some knock?
Nope...no knock whatsoever. All of our tuning is done completely through the ECU with GIAC. Every tune we provide, whether in pump or race mode, is completely without knock (with full control intact), and with full lambda control.

Originally Posted by Divexxtreme
Took the words right out my mouth. Either knock or too much torque. My GT2 had been running 750-800 rwhp at 1.6-1.8 BAR before I built the motor. The stock rods were perfect when we opened her up:
TQ on the 777hp run was 714lb/ft I believe. By no means am I trying to suggest that any car running this power level will bend the rods. I just wanted to share the experience of what happened to our car. Every engine is different, but knowing that this potentially could happen is the reason we limit power from our kits to below 700 wheel without a built motor.

Originally Posted by Boostholic
+700whp on pumpgas would cause bent rods

Both SPI and Proto use racegas on that power range
The 777 awhp dyno runs were done with race gas. The car otherwise was driven daily with 93 octane pump gas at a much lower power level.
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #10  
Steamboat's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 687
From: Colorado Mtns.
Rep Power: 80
Steamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond reputeSteamboat has a reputation beyond repute
Appreciate your candor. Best luck on future endeavors!
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #11  
xsbc63x's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 87
From: milwaukee, wi
Rep Power: 31
xsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud ofxsbc63x has much to be proud of
Great write up!
 
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 11:13 PM
  #12  
speed21's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,634
Rep Power: 249
speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !speed21 Is a GOD !
Nice write up!

Tom do you have a photo you can post on the upper big end bearing shells?

Also did you change the pistons along with the rods?
 
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 12:52 AM
  #13  
pete95zhn's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 886
From: In my garage
Rep Power: 123
pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !pete95zhn Is a GOD !
According to local build/test ( 996 turbo ) rods start to bend over 1 000 newton meter = 737 pound foot torque, especially at low rpm. Engine was running on an engine dyno.

Talked this about the builder an year ago, can't rememeber exact rpm-figures.
 
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 01:19 AM
  #14  
TTdude's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,321
From: Fastlane USA
Rep Power: 246
TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !TTdude Is a GOD !
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
Nope...no knock whatsoever. All of our tuning is done completely through the ECU with GIAC. Every tune we provide, whether in pump or race mode, is completely without knock (with full control intact), and with full lambda control.

The 777 awhp dyno runs were done with race gas. The car otherwise was driven daily with 93 octane pump gas at a much lower power level.
Originally Posted by Tom@Champion
During it’s daily use and prior dyno testing, the car was running a pump gas program at 725awhp, which is what we’re confident caused the damage.
Hmmm....maybe it's just me but this seems like a contridiction. You say no knock, car running at "much lower power level" but at the same time you say it's running on pump gas program at 725awhp (not that much lower) which is what caused the problem.

It seems to me that it's not the pressure per se at that power level but rather uncontrolled pressure due to detonation from wrong fuel use.
 
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 01:47 AM
  #15  
milou's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,768
From: Cyprus
Rep Power: 111
milou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond reputemilou has a reputation beyond repute
My car did 635awhp and 924nm/torque on pump 100 and methanol, I drive my car very very hard with no issues at all
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.