997 Turbo / GT2 2006–2012 Turbo discussion on the 997 model Porsche 911 Twin Turbo.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: HBI Auto

Cobb Tuning !!

Old Jan 28, 2018 | 07:37 AM
  #1  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Cobb Tuning !!

Hello members!!
Well I hope some experienced member can help me understand Cobb tune, without starting a war!!
I had Cobb AP for 2 months now. I have nothing but good things to say about Cobb's power and car drives a lot smoother then stock.
So I went up from Cobb Stage 1 to Cobb Stage 2 ( FVD 200 Cells Cat exhaust system ). Now recently I just had a Cobb Dyno Pro-tune..
Here is something I do not understand.I have contacted Cobb but then answer they gave, lets say " user friendly"
Of course I understand," at the end of the day hp gains are different for everyone and there are many variables that go into play when measuring those numbers, fuel type, temperature, different dyno's will give you different numbers, etc."

Ok . From Cobb Website it says Stage 1 gain about 10% HP 8%TQ. So that will be 480HP out of the box + 48 ~ hp should make the car around 528HP.
Now the Stage 2 require an aftermarket exhaust. gain about 17%hp more will make the car about ~ 561HP

Now after the Pro-tune. The Car now makes 550HP ( 450 WHP ) and 500TQ, The tuner told me he picked up about 50HP over the Cobb stage 2…
BTW the Pro tuner was a great guy to work with...
For my car the Stage 1 and stage 2 almost same power..
So my question is .. Protune pick up 50HP that make the Cobb stage 2. 500HP. Which only 20 HP more then the stock? Also on the dyno Cobb stage 2 showing 400WHP… 400X1.23= 492HP . What happened to 17% to 24% gain?
I have a friend who has the same car as my, and runs with GIAC stage 2. On dyno it came out close to 600HP and a lot more TQ than the Cobb.
Please do not get me wrong, I love the Cobb AP and power.. just want to understand where all the power went?
Here are the dyno sheets.
Thanks for all your help...
 
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0486.HEIC.jpeg
Views:	192
Size:	277.9 KB
ID:	519970   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0490.HEIC.jpeg
Views:	217
Size:	284.4 KB
ID:	519971  
Old Jan 29, 2018 | 09:53 AM
  #2  
997TurboTom's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 586
From: South Florida
Rep Power: 90
997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !997TurboTom Is a GOD !
seems like a low reading dyno, the stock vs final tune looks like a good pickup. That's my impression
 
Old Jan 29, 2018 | 12:51 PM
  #3  
bsh's Avatar
bsh
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 22
bsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to allbsh is a name known to all
Dynosheets are "useless" without a base run before tuning. Different dynos read different #`s and are meant for tuning. When tuning, use the same dyno to compare results for each thing you change.
You are after the delta when doing mods.
 
Old Jan 31, 2018 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
turbofan997's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 44
From: AJACCIO
Rep Power: 0
turbofan997 is infamous around these parts
So true, only the delta means something
 
Old Jan 31, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #5  
Whosdady's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 17
Whosdady is a jewel in the roughWhosdady is a jewel in the roughWhosdady is a jewel in the rough
It looks like you have a 997.1 TT tiptronic. Does your friend have a manual? Is it a 997.1 or 997.2? 600 hp with a 997.1 tip sounds impossible with just a tune and hf cats, regardless of the dyno.

But I completely agree, the delta is what matters... But my point above is that you want to compare apples to apples...
 
Old Feb 1, 2018 | 10:08 AM
  #6  
FirstStateCamber's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 71
From: Delaware
Rep Power: 13
FirstStateCamber is infamous around these parts
I can tell you from personal experience my Supra makes a 100hp difference on a DynoJet versus a Mustang Dyno. Overall it sounds as if your tuner has created a tune specific to your car and the conditions that day and all is well. Don't be stuck on the numbers, its all about the drive ability.
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 09:25 AM
  #7  
thewraith's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 34
From: washington dc
Rep Power: 20
thewraith has a spectacular aura aboutthewraith has a spectacular aura about
Yep, I made close to 830 in my Supra on a dynojet and about 745 on a Mustang dyno. They read different.
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 01:36 PM
  #8  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Roffle Waffle
seems like a low reading dyno, the stock vs final tune looks like a good pickup. That's my impression
I thought also kind low...
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 01:38 PM
  #9  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by bsh
Dynosheets are "useless" without a base run before tuning. Different dynos read different #`s and are meant for tuning. When tuning, use the same dyno to compare results for each thing you change.
You are after the delta when doing mods.
I agree with you... but is kinda shocking to see that Cobb stage 1 and 2 are the same power and only picked 20 to 30 hp more then the stock for my car..
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Whosdady
It looks like you have a 997.1 TT tiptronic. Does your friend have a manual? Is it a 997.1 or 997.2? 600 hp with a 997.1 tip sounds impossible with just a tune and hf cats, regardless of the dyno.

But I completely agree, the delta is what matters... But my point above is that you want to compare apples to apples...
We have same car all 2008 997.1 tiptronic turbo.. he has GIAC stage2 ... even on GIAC website showing 570 hp and 590hp on rice mod, I think..
 
Old Feb 7, 2018 | 01:46 PM
  #11  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by FirstStateCamber
I can tell you from personal experience my Supra makes a 100hp difference on a DynoJet versus a Mustang Dyno. Overall it sounds as if your tuner has created a tune specific to your car and the conditions that day and all is well. Don't be stuck on the numbers, its all about the drive ability.
Yes I am thinking maybe do a different see the difference?
My dyno graph is kinda all over the place.. I do not know if I have a boost leak or not... Also I just noticed I set shift at 6500 RPM from Cobb AP.. that may have something to do with it?
 
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 09:02 AM
  #12  
jimmyz2's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
From: Marin, Ca.
Rep Power: 20
jimmyz2 is infamous around these parts
I only have a 997.1 Carrera S, but why does Cobb think they "know" better than factory Porsche? I am new so be easy.
 
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 09:32 AM
  #13  
A418t81's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 581
From: Southeast
Rep Power: 128
A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !A418t81 Is a GOD !
Maximum dyno numbers aside, your car didn't like the off the shelf Cobb mapping that was loaded. See how wavy your curves are? That's all signs that the ECU was unhappy about something and was likely pulling timing and possibly boost to correct for it. This is a great example of how pro tuning and mapping each car is by far the best solution. Every car is different. Mine required base fueling changes even with the stock injectors to get the short term fuel trims in check.

Finally, you can see how much smoother your graphs are after the pro tuner was done. It is obvious the ECU is no longer reacting to issues with the tuning as before.
 
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 09:36 AM
  #14  
thewraith's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 34
From: washington dc
Rep Power: 20
thewraith has a spectacular aura aboutthewraith has a spectacular aura about
Manufacturers build their vehicles with a specific safe and carb compliant tune. These cars are usually built for the average customer who intend to keep the cars stock. The cars are usually built with basic specs that shouldn't vary from one another and loading a safe tune ensures that the engine is kept safe. Due to varying elevation, temperature, and density factors- the tune is usually pretty rich to avoid detonation. There is always room to custom tune for your own altitude, temperature, driving style, etc.

If you begin to modify the car- for example you add aftermarket parts, you would need to tune the car to take advantage of the increased airflow, fuel, or spark. This is where companies like cobb come in and offer customization. Although I had a horrible experience with cobb since they used 09 gtr owners like testers- they make a decent product. I'd personally go with another company since the customer support from cobb in 2010 was such garbage and they would over promise and under deliver on the GT-R tunes. If you do buy the cobb- get a custom tune done and stay away from the OTS tunes.
 

Last edited by thewraith; Feb 20, 2018 at 06:42 AM.
Old Feb 19, 2018 | 11:48 PM
  #15  
kbarker1985's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
From: AZ
Rep Power: 0
kbarker1985 is infamous around these parts
Question

Originally Posted by A418t81
Maximum dyno numbers aside, your car didn't like the off the shelf Cobb mapping that was loaded. See how wavy your curves are? That's all signs that the ECU was unhappy about something and was likely pulling timing and possibly boost to correct for it. This is a great example of how pro tuning and mapping each car is by far the best solution. Every car is different. Mine required base fueling changes even with the stock injectors to get the short term fuel trims in check.

Finally, you can see how much smoother your graphs are after the pro tuner was done. It is obvious the ECU is no longer reacting to issues with the tuning as before.
I agree pro tune is the best solution. Do you think a TCU Tuning from EVOMSit EVOMS. or GIAC with my Cobb ECU tune will be a good idea?
Is TCU upgrade make shift faster? TCU from GIAC stage 2 said will shift like PDK???
 

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:09 PM.