997 2005-2012 911 C2, C2S, C4, C4S, GTS, Targa and Cabriolet Model Discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

my 997s vs. M3 e92 (story)

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #61  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
Who gives a flying f*ck. Straightline performance is one aspect of the total performance envelope. If that's all you're interested in then buy a Viper and be done with it.

I would love to see an E92 or a Pontiac go round the Nurburgring as fast as a C2S. They're both sedans, have higher centers of gravity, weigh more and have inferior brakes and poor steering feel. (And yes I have driven an E92 and it's no sports car) In a C2S you would have time to stop for coffee before those guys caught up.
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:51 AM
  #62  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
you guys are no better than the corvettte guys, the mustang guys, the honda guys etc. wahahahahhaha

it's amazing how many dudes have their d1cks tied to their cars so when they take a bath their car windows fog up
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #63  
czechchamp's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 432
From: Houston
Rep Power: 38
czechchamp has a spectacular aura aboutczechchamp has a spectacular aura aboutczechchamp has a spectacular aura about
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
you guys are no better than the corvettte guys, the mustang guys, the honda guys etc. wahahahahhaha

it's amazing how many dudes have their d1cks tied to their cars so when they take a bath their car windows fog up

Sad but true.

Now let's rewatch the video of GT3 stompin the new M3 few times so that all of us can feel better....

In addition, I'd like to give thumbs up to Doug (Gravedgr) for his insightful posts! Good job man & nice car!
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #64  
mattwhite's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 33
From: Houston, Texas
Rep Power: 20
mattwhite is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by Le Chef
Who gives a flying f*ck. Straightline performance is one aspect of the total performance envelope. If that's all you're interested in then buy a Viper and be done with it.

I would love to see an E92 or a Pontiac go round the Nurburgring as fast as a C2S. They're both sedans, have higher centers of gravity, weigh more and have inferior brakes and poor steering feel. (And yes I have driven an E92 and it's no sports car) In a C2S you would have time to stop for coffee before those guys caught up.
When you say E92, do you mean E92 M3? Because the C2S and the M3 have about dead even Nordschleife times - right around 8 flat. Sport Auto recently did an 8.05 in an M3, and it has been reported that BMW factory test drivers have cracked 8. The best reported time for a C2S is 7:59, but that was with famed factory driver Walter Rohrl at the helm and in a car that had the lowered Euro ride height.
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #65  
akim47's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 279
From: Orange County, CA
Rep Power: 31
akim47 is infamous around these partsakim47 is infamous around these parts
... in the end... you buy a f'in porsche because its a porsche...

1) it will NEVER be the fastest car out there.....
2) it will NEVER be the fastest car out there.....
3) it will NEVER be the fastest car out there.....

but who cares? that's not why you got it...

also,
1) it will NEVER be the fastest car on the track...

etc.. etc... etc...

I was at a time attack race and Porsche owners will getting SKOOLED, and I mean SKOOLED by S2000s, Evos and STIs... soooo who the f cares? Perhaps the Pcar owners were driving less balsy protecting their 100K investments... I dunno... but I dont care what the faster car is... Pcars are fun to drive, are pretty damn fast (sub 13sec out of the box) and come with a special feeling with them...
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 12:45 PM
  #66  
Le Chef's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 379
From: Chicago USA
Rep Power: 38
Le Chef is infamous around these parts
Street tires vs. track tires

Originally Posted by mattwhite
When you say E92, do you mean E92 M3? Because the C2S and the M3 have about dead even Nordschleife times - right around 8 flat. Sport Auto recently did an 8.05 in an M3, and it has been reported that BMW factory test drivers have cracked 8. The best reported time for a C2S is 7:59, but that was with famed factory driver Walter Rohrl at the helm and in a car that had the lowered Euro ride height.
You also have to test these cars on the same day with the same driver, and the same type of tires to have any real validity, as different weather and different drivers, and Cup tires can make a huge difference.

The new C2S should clear up any doubts.

And quite frankly if I wanted a sedan the M3 would probably be my choice, but I want a sports car, hence the 997S.
 
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #67  
Benjamin Choi's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,103
From: Kirkland, WA
Rep Power: 147
Benjamin Choi is infamous around these parts
Pcars are fun to drive, are pretty damn fast (sub 13sec out of the box) and come with a special feeling with them...
It's like these dudes try to cram the Porsche into a little box thereby compartmentalizing one performance piece of it (straightline monkey speed in this case) and utterly failing at showing the world it's faster than the fastest cars built.

they faily and their egos are hurt, so the swolled up insecurity cheerleader within them come up with a bunch of lame **** excuses about why the other car sux. the E92 M3 is an awesome car.

the 911 is not just one thing... it's holism at its finest... it's the look, the history, the "club", the sound of the flat6 brapping behind you, steering feel, the click of the clutch, the unique shape.... it's all these things put together that make it special.

it is not special because it is fast ina straightline. i would never ever pick the E92 M3 over a similar condition water-cooled 911. PERIOD. if there's a price delta, give me the extra cash left over and make like Fiddy and Go straight to da bank
 

Last edited by Benjamin Choi; Jun 5, 2008 at 02:55 PM.
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #68  
gravedgr's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 728
From: Alpharetta, GA
Rep Power: 81
gravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond reputegravedgr has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by czechchamp
Sad but true.

Now let's rewatch the video of GT3 stompin the new M3 few times so that all of us can feel better....

In addition, I'd like to give thumbs up to Doug (Gravedgr) for his insightful posts! Good job man & nice car!
Thanks, but really its just all about being honest with yourself (and others). There is no reason to get defensive about the 911's inability to compete with some less expensive cars in a variety of categories (performance being only one). I promise you that the kid that that stops on his bike and says "Hey mister, AWESOME CAR!" couldn't give a **** about whether its faster than an M3 at the drag strip, Nurburgring, etc. or whether it turns you into the Stig when you get on the track. And I would bet that a large percentage of us were that little kid at some point in life - and probably still are when we sit in our new 911 the first time - maybe every time? I get a big smile on my face every time I fire up and hear the rumble:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGxw_dIZh3M (cold start, camera on trash can )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5e_V605Cvg (inside the car, light acceleration [cold engine])

However, if you bought it because you think you are the Stig on the track and that your Porsche is somehow going to make you king of the <insert track here>, you're just a tool. All you need is about $30-40k and you can track cars that will lap the 911 like Dale Jarrett in the UPS truck.
 

Last edited by gravedgr; Jun 5, 2008 at 11:43 PM.
Old Jun 8, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #69  
mkk62's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 185
From: fort myers, fl
Rep Power: 26
mkk62 is infamous around these parts
IMHO i have had 4 M cars and since the last E46m3 the reliability issues moved me to now my second 997S...wow, no comparison in feel and reliablity like a tank...(#1 JD powers) also my local 2 bmw dealerships have become like toyota dealers (i also have a toyota) large volume, no personal care etc...so in my book not only is the 997S a better car but the dealership, reliability, and overall feel of the car are better...also i never got used to when i had a z3Mroadster that everyone would say "nice z3"...

there is no doubt when you see a carrera it is beautiful..

M3 looks like a steroided e92...not so beautiful i wish they would have stuck to the old m3's light nimble and reliable and simple look.... personally if i got another bmw i would get the 335i and mod it...IMHO

a lot of old m3 fans that i know have moved away from them ...because of cost and weight and reliability issues..
the carrera "feels" like the best sports car.....
 
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #70  
arr0gant's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 274
From: St Louis
Rep Power: 30
arr0gant is infamous around these parts
I went from a 2001 911 Turbo straight to an E90 M. I test drove a 2005 Carrera S, then the M and I had to go back and drive a 2007 Carrera S and that last drive convinced ME that the M was the better car for me

I love Porsche, but I ain't lookin' back. My M is a BEAST and I love it!!
 

Last edited by arr0gant; Jun 9, 2008 at 03:36 PM.
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:13 AM
  #71  
Skylar's Dad's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 199
From: Irvine, California
Rep Power: 32
Skylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to beholdSkylar's Dad is a splendid one to behold
Originally Posted by Benjamin Choi
you guys are no better than the corvettte guys, the mustang guys, the honda guys etc. wahahahahhaha

it's amazing how many dudes have their d1cks tied to their cars so when they take a bath their car windows fog up
Oh, I think you should rethink that statement- We are definitley BETTER than the HONDA guys......
 
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #72  
WaltB's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 462
From: Dallas
Rep Power: 64
WaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond reputeWaltB has a reputation beyond repute
+1......
 
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 02:05 AM
  #73  
hkiang1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
From: Oakland, CA
Rep Power: 0
hkiang1 is infamous around these parts
Originally Posted by mattwhite
I don't think it is fair to lump the new M3 in this category. The last generation E46 M3 had 333hp and now 7 years later, the E92 M3 gets a bump to 414hp, which will probably be set for the next 7 years. Also, the motor redlines at 8,4000rpm and isn't that high on torque (297ft/lbs).

I promise you, drive the new M3 and you won't be asking "what is all that power doing." Not only is it brutally fast (as quick if not quicker than a 997S), it handles more neutrally as well. The 997 tends to understeer slightly on turn-in, which can shift to slight oversteer on corner exit. Turn in on the M3 is lightning fast, with no hint of understeer, and it continues this balance through the entire corner. Now the 997 is a more visceral experience given that it is lighter, lower to the ground, rear engine, has better steering feel, etc., but that doesn't mean the M3 won't be able to keep up through the corners.

And before anyone jumps on me for being biased, I own both.
I think several of you are missing the point. The video was not asking the question "why you bought a Porsche and not an M3". I think the video just showcased that the 997 S is not as fast as E92 M3. It's not. I think I know. I, like Matt, have owned both. I have a 2013 M3 now and had an 2005 Carrera S previously. (Actually, I would characterize myself as a Porsche guy and I still have a '94 Carrera 4). I have found the M3 to be both faster in a straight line and on a track. The 997 just doesn't have the outright power the M3 has. The 997S (at least the first gen) has it's virtues - it is a Porsche, but it's hard to argue that the 997 somehow is better than the M3 based on any performance related criteria. Cheers and best.
 
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 11:37 AM
  #74  
mattyf's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 593
From: Pasadena, CA
Rep Power: 485
mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !mattyf Is a GOD !
Way to dig up 5 yr old thread!
 
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #75  
hkiang1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
From: Oakland, CA
Rep Power: 0
hkiang1 is infamous around these parts
I hear you. Was thinking of buying a 996 TT and happened upon this thread. What can I say? Too much time.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM.